31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT: BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE<br />

Figure 5.1: One in 20 over 60’s have dementia, on average one in 8 over 65’s are subject to long-term care, and<br />

in the next 30 years rates the support ratio for older people will halve<br />

Panel A: Population aged 65 years and over receiving long-term<br />

care, 2011 (or nearest year) and prevalence of dementia among<br />

the population aged 60 years and over, 2009<br />

Panel B: Over 65 population as a ratio of working age population<br />

(15-64)<br />

Note: For long-term care estimates, data is missing for the United Kingdom, and is for different dates in other countries (Japan (2006),<br />

United States (2007), Canada (2009), and France (2010)). The long-term care OECD average is for 21 countries (see online data<br />

annex). For prevelance of Dementia, OECD average is for 34 countries.<br />

Source: OECD Health Statistics 2013 (OECD, 2013d), (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health-data-en and citing Wimo et al [2012] for<br />

dementia estimates) and Society at a Glance, (OECD, 2014b).<br />

5.2.1.2 Unemployment, inactivity and school drop-outs<br />

5.10 Helping people into good quality and secure employment is critical for a range of desirable social<br />

outcomes today and in the future. Today, the private and public social gains from employment include a<br />

reduction in household poverty – and the improved quality of life this brings – increases in productivity,<br />

and reductions in benefit dependency. For tomorrow, employment is critical for building the social<br />

contributions needed to pay for a person’s own pension and elderly care, as well as for tax contributions<br />

that fund much of the present public social spending in the areas of health, education, and social protection<br />

among others. Helping youth into quality employment or stay in education settings is the foundation for<br />

success in this area, as well as a healthy economy and society.<br />

5.11 Table 5.1 presents experiences of long-term unemployment spells, unemployment rates for older<br />

workers, education drop-out rates for older youth, and rates of inactivity in youth (NEET – "not in<br />

education, employment or training") in younger and older cohorts. Percentage point movements up or<br />

down in the past five years are presented in parentheses, where available. Altogether, the data highlight<br />

need, and to a degree a lack of effective policy development, in present social ‘activation’ systems: two<br />

factors which would indicate demand for SII-type innovation in this sector.<br />

5.12 More specifically, many country systems are struggling to produce effective employment or<br />

‘activation’ outcomes in older youth cohorts, and, with the exception of Germany, people who are<br />

unemployed are facing much greater challenges in returning to work now than they did 5 years previously<br />

(Italy and Japan have notable challenges to contend with here, and across the OECD as a whole the rate of<br />

longer term unemployment has increased by 50% in 5 years).<br />

60 © OECD 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!