31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT: BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE<br />

is being devolved to the sub-central level for administration (around 10% of total). All countries under the<br />

45 degree line receive devolved funds to some degree. Notably, in Australia and the United States<br />

sub-central governments only administer their own revenues; in Japan, some sub-central revenues are<br />

administered at the central level.<br />

5.54 For SII, as noted above, not only will this shift of funds create levels of uncertainty about streams<br />

of revenue etc. to social enterprise where it exists, but the information on the share of revenue administered<br />

at different levels highlights the potential for SII to function differently in different countries (nationally<br />

administered services will have different ‘business’ plans compared to locally administered services, for<br />

example in the areas of fixed capital and employee ‘banks’, economies of scale, underlying legislation and<br />

reporting/auditing mechanisms).<br />

Figure 5.9 How much of central government funds are devolved to local authorities for social interventions<br />

varies widely<br />

Note: G7 countries and Australia are highlighted.<br />

Source: OECD (2013b).<br />

5.4 Evaluating what works in social service provision<br />

5.55 The evidence on social outcomes and social spending shown sections 5.2 and 5.3 can be used to<br />

highlight challenges and opportunities for SII. However, together these only highlight the space into which<br />

SII might move, and they do not provide any clear messages as to how to implement processes that might<br />

‘fill these social outcome gaps’.<br />

5.56 This section reviews briefly the mix of evidence on good practice in public service provision in<br />

the area of elderly care and childcare, highlighting potential opportunities for SII. What is most evident is<br />

that better data and evaluations are needed. Chapter 7 discusses briefly ways to address this gap, and<br />

provides a point of departure for meaningful outcome measurement for impact evaluation in this area.<br />

5.4.1 Good practice in service provision<br />

5.57 Reading the data on social outcomes above alongside the data on public interventions clearly<br />

shows continued and sometimes expanding social need in the context of increases of public spending in<br />

most social sectors. In particular, the areas of elderly care and childcare stand out as priorities. For SII to<br />

© OECD 2015 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!