08.05.2020 Views

2009_Book_FoodChemistry

food chemistry

food chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5 Kinetics of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions 125

indicative of positive cooperation. Each substrate

molecule, often called an effector, accelerates

the binding of succeeding substrate molecules,

thereby increasing the catalytic activity of the

enzyme (case b in Fig. 2.28). When R s > 81, the

system shows negative cooperation. The effector

(or allosteric inhibitor) decreases the binding of

the next substrate molecule (case c in Fig. 2.28).

Various models have been developed in order

to explain the allosteric effect. Only the

symmetry model proposed by Monod, Wyman

and Changeux (1965) will be described in its

simplified form: specifically, when the substrate

acts as a positive allosteric regulator or effector.

Based on this model, the protomers of an

allosteric enzyme exist in two conformations,

one with a high affinity (R-form) and the other

with a low affinity (T-form) for the substrate.

These two forms are interconvertible. There is an

interaction between protomers. Thus, binding of

the allosteric regulator by one protomer induces

a conformational change of all the subunits and

greatly increases the activity of the enzyme.

Let us assume that the R- and T-forms of an enzyme

consisting of four protomers are in an equilibrium

which lies completely on the side of the

T-form:

(2.64)

Addition of substrate, which here is synonymous

to the allosteric effector, shifts the equilibrium

from the low affinity T-form to the substantially

more catalytically active R-form. Since one substrate

molecule activates four catalytically active

sites, the steep rise in enzyme activity after only

a slight increase in substrate concentration is not

unexpected. In this model it is important that

the RT conformation is not permitted. All subunits

must be in the same conformational state

at one time to conserve the symmetry of the protomers.

The equation given by Hill in 1913, derived

from the sigmoidal absorption of oxygen by

hemoglobin, is also suitable for a quantitative description

of allosteric enzymes with sigmoidal behavior:

υ 0 =

V(A 0) n

K ′ +(A 0 ) n (2.65)

Fig. 2.29. Linear presentation of Hill’s equation

The equation says that the catalytic rate increases

by the nth power of the substrate concentration

when [A 0 ] is small in comparison to K. The Hill

coefficient, n, is a measure of the sigmoidal character

of the curve and, therefore, of the extent

of the enzyme’s cooperativity. For n = 1 (Equation

2.65) the reaction rate is transformed into the

Michaelis–Menten equation, i. e. in which no cooperativity

factor exists.

In order to assess the experimental data, Equation

2.65 is rearranged into an equation of

a straight line:

log = υ 0

= nlog(A 0 ) − logK ′ (2.66)

V − υ 0

The slope of the straight line obtained by

plotting the substrate concentration as log[A 0 ]

versus log[v 0 /(V − v 0 )] is the Hill coefficient, n

(Fig. 2.29). The constant K incorporates all the

individual K m values involved in all the steps of

substrate binding and transformation. The value

of K m is obtained by using the substrate concentration,

denoted as [A 0 ] 0.5 v ,atwhichv 0 = 0.5V.

Under these conditions, the following is derived

from Equation 2.66):

log 0.5V

0.5V = 0 = n · log(A 0) 0.5 V − logK ′ (a)

K ′ =(A 0 ) n 0.5 V

2.5.2 Effect of Inhibitors

(b)

(2.67)

The catalytic activity of an enzyme, in addition

to substrate concentration, is affected by the type

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!