08.05.2020 Views

2009_Book_FoodChemistry

food chemistry

food chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12.5 Water Holding Capacity of Meat 591

Fig. 12.26. Swelling of meat as affected by salts. Beef

muscle homogenate; the ionic strength of the salt added

to homogenate is µ = 0.20; — control, −−− NaCl,

−·−·−NaSCN (according to Hamm, 1972)

The water holding capacity of muscle tissue

soon after slaughter is high because the muscle

Fig. 12.25. Swelling of meat as affected by pH. a Beef

muscle homogenate, 5 days post mortem, b beef muscle

cut in cubes 3 mm edge length, −−−weight increase,

— volume increase (according to Hamm, 1972)

ments (M line, Z line, cf. 12.3.2.1.4) probably occurs,

which facilitates the extension of myofibrils.

The water holding capacity of meat is of great

practical importance for meat processing and is

affected by pH and the ion environment of the

proteins (cf. 1.4.3.1 and 1.4.3.3).

The total charge on the proteins and, hence, their

electrostatic interactions are the highest at their

isoelectric points. Therefore, meat swelling is

minimal in the pH range of 5.0–5.5 (Fig. 12.25).

Addition of salt to meat shifts the isoelectric point

and, hence, the corresponding swelling minimum

to lower pH values, due to the prefered binding

of the anion. This means that, in the presence

of salts, water holding is increased at all pH’s

higher than the isoelectric point of the unsalted

meat (Fig. 12.26).

Fig. 12.27. Water holding capacity and rigidity of beef

muscle. — Water holding capacity, −−− rigidity

(stiffness) expressed as the surface area acquired by homogenate

after being pressed between filter papers, under

standardized conditions (according to Hamm, 1972)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!