3.0 <strong>International</strong> Court of Justice (ICJ) Jurisprudence 3.1 ICJ <strong>Citations</strong> 3.1.1 ICJ Decisions (1945-Present) Cite ICJ decisions in cases of controversy by title (italicized), name of the parties (in parentheses, italicized, <strong>and</strong> often abbreviated), type of hearing, type of decision (if applicable), “I.C.J. Reports” (sometimes abbreviated as “I.C.J. Rep.” or “I.C.J.R.”), year of the reporter, volume (in parentheses, if applicable), date of the decision (in parentheses), first page of the decision (if published), <strong>and</strong> page <strong>and</strong> paragraph referenced (if applicable): 228 Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Icel<strong>and</strong>), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1973 (Feb. 2), p. 3. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 826. Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2002 (I) (Feb. 14). Types of decisions include: Order, Judgment, Jurisdiction Judgment, Merits Judgment, <strong>and</strong> Advisory Opinion. 3.1.1.2 Advisory Opinions Cite advisory opinions of the <strong>International</strong> Court of Justice by title (italicized), “Advisory Opinion”, “I.C.J. Reports” (sometimes abbreviated as “I.C.J. Rep.” or “I.C.J.R.”), volume (by year), date of the opinion, first page of the opinion, <strong>and</strong> page <strong>and</strong> paragraph referenced (if applicable): <strong>Legal</strong>ity of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Rep. 1996 (July 8), p. 66. 3.2 Permanent Court of <strong>International</strong> Justice (PCIJ) <strong>Citations</strong> (1922 - 1946) Cite Permanent Court of <strong>International</strong> Justice decisions <strong>and</strong> opinions by title (italicized), name of the parties (no parties are listed for advisory opinions), type of decision (if applicable), year of the decision, “P.C.I.J.”, reporter series, case number, <strong>and</strong> page referenced (if applicable): River Meuse Case (Netherl<strong>and</strong>s v. Belgium) (1937) P.C.I.J. Series A/B, no. 70. Société Commerciale de Belgique, Judgment (1939) P.C.I.J. Series A/B, No. 78.
3.2.1 List of Decisions ICJ orders <strong>and</strong> decisions are available at www.icj-cij.org (click on “Decisions”). 3.3 Major Judgments <strong>and</strong> Orders of Contentious ICJ Cases Sovereignty over Pulau Litigan <strong>and</strong> Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2002 (IV) (Dec. 17). L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Maritime Boundary between Cameroon <strong>and</strong> Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equa<strong>to</strong>rial Guinea intervening), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2002 (III) (Oct. 10). Armed Activities on the Terri<strong>to</strong>ry of the Congo (<strong>New</strong> Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rw<strong>and</strong>a), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2002 (II) (July 10). Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2002 (I) (Feb.14). Maritime Delimitation between Nicaragua <strong>and</strong> Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2000 (Mar. 21). Application of the Convention on the Prevention <strong>and</strong> Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Yugoslavia), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2000 (June 27), p. 12. Armed activities on the terri<strong>to</strong>ry of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (Jan. 30), p. 3. Armed activities on the terri<strong>to</strong>ry of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rw<strong>and</strong>a), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (Jan. 30), p. 6. Armed activities on the terri<strong>to</strong>ry of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Ug<strong>and</strong>a), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (Nov. 29). Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2000 (June 21), p. 12. Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2000 (Sept. 8), p. 146. Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2002 (Feb. 14), p. 3. Terri<strong>to</strong>rial <strong>and</strong> Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2002 (Feb. 26). Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (June 28). <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 124. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Canada), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 259. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. France) Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 363. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Germany), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 422. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Italy), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 481. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Netherl<strong>and</strong>s), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 542. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Portugal), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 656. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 826. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 761. <strong>Legal</strong>ity of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (June 2), p. 916. LeGr<strong>and</strong> (Germany v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (June 27). Sovereignty over Pulau Litigan <strong>and</strong> Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (23 Oct.). Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Paraguay v. United States of America), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1998 (April 9), p. 248. Kasikili/Sedudu Isl<strong>and</strong> (Botswana/Namibia), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (Dec. 13), p. 1045. Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (<strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> v. France) Case, Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1995 (Sept. 22), p. 288. Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1996 (May 8), p. 58. L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Maritime Boundary between Cameroon <strong>and</strong> Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equa<strong>to</strong>rial Guinea intervening), Preliminary Objections Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1998 (June 11), p. 275. Request for Interpretation <strong>and</strong> of the Judgment of 11 June 1998 in the Case concerning the L<strong>and</strong> Maritime Boundary between Cameroon <strong>and</strong> Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria), Preliminary Objections Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1999 (Mar. 25), p. 31. Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1997 (Sept. 25), p.7. Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1997 (Feb. 5), p.3. Application of the Convention on the Prevention <strong>and</strong> Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia <strong>and</strong> Montenegro)), Preliminary Objections Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1996 (July 11), p.595 Application of the Convention on the Prevention <strong>and</strong> Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia <strong>and</strong> Montenegro)), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (Sept. 10). Application of the Convention on the Prevention <strong>and</strong> Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia <strong>and</strong> Montenegro)), Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1993 (April 8), p. 3; Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1993 (April 16), p. 29; Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1993 (Sept. 13), p. 325. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Preliminary Objection Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1992- Questions of Interpretation <strong>and</strong> Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United States of America), Preliminary Objections Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1998 (Feb. 27), p. 115. Questions of Interpretation <strong>and</strong> Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1998 (Feb. 27), p. 9. Maritime Delimitation <strong>and</strong> Terri<strong>to</strong>rial Questions Between Qatar <strong>and</strong> Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain), Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 2001 (Mar. 16), p. 40. Maritime Delimitation <strong>and</strong> Terri<strong>to</strong>rial Questions Between Qatar <strong>and</strong> Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain), Jurisdiction <strong>and</strong> Admissibility Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1995 (Feb. 15), p. 6. Maritime Delimitation <strong>and</strong> Terri<strong>to</strong>rial Questions Between Qatar <strong>and</strong> Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain), Jurisdiction <strong>and</strong> Admissibility Judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1994 (July 1), p. 112. Passage Through the Great Belt (Finl<strong>and</strong> v. Denmark), Provisional Measures Order, I.C.J. Rep. 1991 (July 29), p. 12. 229
- Page 1 and 2:
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW J
- Page 3 and 4:
Contents FORWARD AND GENERAL INSTRU
- Page 5 and 6:
6.0 NEWSPAPERS AND WEEKLY JOURNALS
- Page 7 and 8:
JAPAN..............................
- Page 9 and 10:
9.0 CITATION OF ELECTRONIC MATERIAL
- Page 11 and 12:
II. CITATION GUIDE.................
- Page 13 and 14:
2.0 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL
- Page 15 and 16:
Forward and General Instructions Pu
- Page 17:
Acknowledgements Publication of the
- Page 20 and 21:
2 http://www.jus.gov.ar/ II. CITATI
- Page 22 and 23:
Courts of Ordinary Jurisdiction for
- Page 24 and 25:
III. SELECTED REFERENCES ENRIQUE R.
- Page 26 and 27:
The Federal Court of Australia was
- Page 28 and 29:
Generally, court names are not incl
- Page 30 and 31:
journal title (italicized), article
- Page 32 and 33:
authority to test the constitutiona
- Page 34 and 35:
16 Trial Court for cartels: Kartell
- Page 36 and 37:
There are two guides available for
- Page 38 and 39:
7.0 Official Publications Cite offi
- Page 40 and 41:
Internet Resources: 22 Federal Sena
- Page 42 and 43:
3.0 Jurisprudence Cite cases by typ
- Page 44 and 45:
26 CANADA I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Commo
- Page 46 and 47:
Cite laws by title (italicized), vo
- Page 48 and 49:
7.0 Official Publications Cite offi
- Page 50 and 51:
mainland China in 1997, but which k
- Page 52 and 53:
There is no comprehensive system of
- Page 54 and 55:
III. SELECTED REFERENCES WANG CHENG
- Page 56 and 57:
Administrative Court. Supreme Court
- Page 58 and 59:
Widely used monograph publications
- Page 60 and 61:
the other hand, do not bind Danish
- Page 62 and 63:
Regulations issued under the author
- Page 64 and 65:
46 Poul Nyrup, Europas Fremtid, tal
- Page 66 and 67:
handles cases involving the state.
- Page 68 and 69:
50 The official gazette of Egypt (a
- Page 70 and 71:
Internet Resource: 52 Parliament: h
- Page 72 and 73:
I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 54 F
- Page 74 and 75:
in the Statute Book, decisions of t
- Page 76 and 77:
I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 58 F
- Page 78 and 79:
2.1.1 Official Gazette Laws and dec
- Page 80 and 81:
62 Gazette du Palais (Gaz. Pal. or
- Page 82 and 83:
FRANÇOISE DREYFUS & FRANÇOIS D’
- Page 84 and 85:
of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof). In
- Page 86 and 87:
Many Federal Statutes can be found
- Page 88 and 89:
4.0 Books Cite books by name of the
- Page 90 and 91:
I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 72 G
- Page 92 and 93:
74 Ministerial Decision: Ypourgiki
- Page 94 and 95:
Cite articles in newspapers and wee
- Page 96 and 97:
78 Archive of Consultation (Green)
- Page 98 and 99:
80 Bendtzen, “The Double Marginal
- Page 100 and 101:
India does not have a uniform citat
- Page 102 and 103:
Previous reporters which no longer
- Page 104 and 105:
Cite articles in journals by name o
- Page 106 and 107:
support of the majority of the Hous
- Page 108 and 109:
Major law reporters are entitled an
- Page 110 and 111:
92 ISRAEL Medinat Israel (State of
- Page 112 and 113:
More formal citations, which includ
- Page 114 and 115:
Cite unpublished cases as if citing
- Page 116 and 117:
hears appeals from the Justice of t
- Page 118 and 119:
3.0 Jurisprudence Cite cases by cou
- Page 120 and 121:
I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 102
- Page 122 and 123:
exceptions, the Japanese government
- Page 124 and 125:
6.0 Newspapers and Weekly Journals
- Page 126 and 127:
2.0 Legislation Cite legislation by
- Page 128 and 129:
110 MEXICO Estados Unidos Mexicanos
- Page 130 and 131:
112 phraseology is allowed when the
- Page 132 and 133:
Cite only official reporters, the n
- Page 134 and 135:
JAMES E. HERGER, AN INTRODUCTION TO
- Page 136 and 137:
The Supreme Court is the highest co
- Page 138 and 139:
III. SELECTED REFERENCES DRISS BASR
- Page 140 and 141:
The highest court is the Supreme Co
- Page 142 and 143:
3.1 Courts Ordinary Jurisdiction Co
- Page 144 and 145:
126 NEW ZEALAND I. COUNTRY PROFILE
- Page 146 and 147:
Cite bills in the same way as acts
- Page 148 and 149:
Cite journal articles only availabl
- Page 150 and 151:
132 NIGERIA Federal Republic of Nig
- Page 152 and 153:
2.4 Edicts 134 Decree No.28 of 1970
- Page 154 and 155:
I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 136
- Page 156 and 157:
3.1 Reporters The most common repor
- Page 158 and 159:
II. CITATION GUIDE There is no unif
- Page 160 and 161:
4.0 Books 142 Khawaja Textile Mills
- Page 162 and 163:
144 THE PHILIPPINES Republika ng Pi
- Page 164 and 165:
2.3 Codes Cite codes by common titl
- Page 166 and 167:
4.0 Books Cite books by volume (if
- Page 168 and 169:
I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 150
- Page 170 and 171:
152 Art. 200 k.k. Alternatively, in
- Page 172 and 173:
1.0 Constitution Cite the Constitut
- Page 174 and 175:
8.0 Unpublished Materials Cite thes
- Page 176 and 177:
Rossiiskoi Federatsii). Ten Federal
- Page 178 and 179:
There are two main types of preside
- Page 180 and 181:
6.0 Newspapers and Weekly Journals
- Page 182 and 183:
II. CITATION GUIDE There is no unif
- Page 184 and 185:
166 SOUTH AFRICA Republic of South
- Page 186 and 187:
3.0 Jurisprudence Cite cases by nam
- Page 188 and 189:
170 SOUTH KOREA Taehan-min'guk (Rep
- Page 190 and 191:
172 Code of Criminal Procedure (Hyo
- Page 192 and 193:
III. SELECTED REFERENCES SUPREME CO
- Page 194 and 195:
The autonomous communities operate
- Page 196 and 197: 3.2 Reports When possible, cite to
- Page 198 and 199: 180 Constitution Act: Regeringsform
- Page 200 and 201: 182 SWITZERLAND Confédération Sui
- Page 202 and 203: 2.2 Codes Cite codes by article and
- Page 204 and 205: Tribunaux (JdT), La Semaine Judicia
- Page 206 and 207: I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 188
- Page 208 and 209: II. CITATION GUIDE There is no unif
- Page 210 and 211: calendar, see Section 0.2 above), e
- Page 212 and 213: 194 TANZANIA Jamhuri ya Muungano wa
- Page 214 and 215: 3.2 Unreported Cases Cite unreporte
- Page 216 and 217: 198 Parliament http://www.parliamen
- Page 218 and 219: I. COUNTRY PROFILE (Civil Law) 200
- Page 220 and 221: Other legislative sources of law us
- Page 222 and 223: 204 Lutfi Duran, “Anayasa Mahkeme
- Page 224 and 225: 206 UNITED KINGDOM I. COUNTRY PROFI
- Page 226 and 227: 2.0 Legislation Cite a statute by s
- Page 228 and 229: (BCLC)). In such circumstances, it
- Page 230 and 231: 212 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I. COU
- Page 232 and 233: 2.1 State and Territory Abbreviatio
- Page 234 and 235: 4.0 Books Cite books by name of the
- Page 236 and 237: 218 UNITED NATIONS & INTERNATIONAL
- Page 238 and 239: They have wide-ranging internationa
- Page 240 and 241: Alternatively, cite U.N. SCOR by vo
- Page 242 and 243: 2.3.1 Parent Organs The major paren
- Page 244 and 245: 2.3.6 Various Examples 226 A/52/4 [
- Page 248 and 249: Maritime Delimitation Between Guine
- Page 250 and 251: III. SELECTED REFERENCES ROGER A. C
- Page 252 and 253: European Coal and Steel Community (
- Page 254 and 255: 1.0 Basic Treaties Since most of th
- Page 256 and 257: Beyond these more formal rules, aut
- Page 258 and 259: Case 26/76 Metro SB-Grossmärkte Gm
- Page 260 and 261: Case 168/78 Commission v France (Al
- Page 262 and 263: Cases 48, 49, 51-57/69 Imperial Che
- Page 264 and 265: I. ORGANIZATION PROFILE 246 WORLD T
- Page 266 and 267: Final Act Embodying Uruguay Round:
- Page 268 and 269: 1.2 Subsequent or Informal Citation
- Page 270 and 271: of GATT/WTO schedules into the Harm
- Page 272 and 273: 254 Treatment by Germany of Imports
- Page 274 and 275: III. SELECTED REFERENCES JEANNE REH
- Page 276 and 277: 4.2 General Comments Cite general c
- Page 278 and 279: 260 III. HYBRID COURTS (Internation
- Page 280 and 281: 2.1.1 Unreported Decisions before N
- Page 282 and 283: 1.3 Separate Opinions Cite separate
- Page 284 and 285: 266 Significant Multilateral Treati
- Page 286 and 287: 3.0 Human Rights Convention on the
- Page 288 and 289: 11.2 Road Traffic Convention on Roa
- Page 290 and 291: 23.0 Antarctica Antarctic Treaty (W
- Page 292 and 293: 4.0 Relationship of International a
- Page 294 and 295: 12.0 State Responsibility Salem Cas
- Page 296:
21.0 International Trade Law [See t