01.07.2020 Views

Dance Techniques 2010

What does today's contemporary dance training look like? Seven research teams at well known European dance universities have tackled this question by working with and querying some of contemporary dance s most important teachers: Alan Danielson, Humphrey/Limón Tradition, Anouk van Dijk, Countertechnique, Barbara Passow, Jooss Leeder Technique, Daniel Roberts Cunningham Technique, Gill Clarke Minding Motion, Jennifer Muller Muller Technique, Lance Gries Release and Alignment Oriented Techniques. This comprehensive study includes interviews, scholarly contributions, and supplementary essays, as well as video recordings and lesson plans. It provides a comparative look into historical contexts, movement characteristics, concepts, and teaching methods. A workbook with two training DVDs for anyone involved in dance practice and theory. Ingo Diehl, Friederike Lampert (Eds.), Dance Techniques 2010 – Tanzplan Germany. With two DVDs. Berlin: Henschel 2011. ISBN 978-3-89487-689-0 (Englisch) Out of print.

What does today's contemporary dance training look like? Seven research teams at well known European dance universities have tackled this question by working with and querying some of contemporary dance s most important teachers: Alan Danielson, Humphrey/Limón Tradition, Anouk van Dijk, Countertechnique, Barbara Passow, Jooss Leeder Technique, Daniel Roberts Cunningham Technique, Gill Clarke Minding Motion, Jennifer Muller Muller Technique, Lance Gries Release and Alignment Oriented Techniques.

This comprehensive study includes interviews, scholarly contributions, and supplementary essays, as well as video recordings and lesson plans. It provides a comparative look into historical contexts, movement characteristics, concepts, and teaching methods. A workbook with two training DVDs for anyone involved in dance practice and theory.

Ingo Diehl, Friederike Lampert (Eds.), Dance Techniques 2010 – Tanzplan Germany. With two DVDs. Berlin: Henschel 2011. ISBN 978-3-89487-689-0 (Englisch) Out of print.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Barbara Passow — Jooss–Leeder Technique<br />

117<br />

Target group: Barbara Passow teaches her version of<br />

the Jooss–Leeder Technique primarily to students at the<br />

Palucca Schule Dresden—Hochschule für Tanz, as well as<br />

to ambitious amateurs who regularly take classes with her.<br />

Group classes (as opposed to private instruction) make<br />

the most sense. The teaching can be varied in its degree<br />

of difficulty by increasing or decreasing the complexity of<br />

coordination along with the demands for flexibility, balance,<br />

strength, speed, and rhythm. Passow recommends<br />

four years of intensive involvement with the technique<br />

for dance career. Generally, the incorporation of so many<br />

different components will depend upon various factors—<br />

such as previous training, talent, and training frequency—<br />

meaning that a specific time frame for learning must be<br />

determined on an case–by–case basis. Previous knowledge<br />

of ballet and modern dance are helpful.<br />

Noticeable progress was made during the fifteen–day<br />

workshop in London, including improved differentiation<br />

in the execution of movement phrases and more volume<br />

was seen in swings, steps, and suspensions. Movement<br />

expression also changed to a stronger, more outwardly<br />

directed presence.<br />

The approach to the work employs mimetic learning,<br />

i.e., emulation. It is thus configured as a mirroring activity<br />

through which predetermined dance forms, phrases, and<br />

exercises are learned and embodied. Passow demonstrated<br />

and discussed a many–layered ideal, using internal and<br />

external images to orient the dancers. Partner work and<br />

small improvisational explorations provided experiential<br />

leeway that fostered technical improvement and strengthened<br />

sensitivity for movement. The class is teacher–centered.<br />

Learning is product–oriented in terms of movement<br />

acquisition, while the development of the dancer’s self–<br />

image is clearly process–oriented.<br />

Passow keeps an eye on the individual and the collective<br />

state of the class, and takes this into consideration when<br />

making decisions about feedback, demands, forbearance,<br />

and motivation. By paying attention to each dancer, she<br />

functions as a partner on the student’s learning path.<br />

Her approach to work requires that the students, for<br />

their part, be willing to put effort into learning, actively<br />

cooperate, and to conform to the given teaching structure.<br />

Passow is always physically present in her students’<br />

learning process. She is more than a witness to her students’<br />

processes in picking up movement; she consciously,<br />

actively, and sensitively engages in a learning process<br />

wherein she is extremely present and in which (depending<br />

on the situation) she alternates between personal attention,<br />

joining her students in the exercise, and concentrated<br />

observation. Passow supports her students, using her presence<br />

to help them to find and maintain focus.<br />

Pedagogical Methods<br />

The lesson structure, as seen during the London project, 30<br />

consisted of six sections (with a total of nine to eleven exercises)<br />

plus a combination that, in part, included elements<br />

from the current learning unit:<br />

1. Movement in place; steps including torso and<br />

arm movements<br />

2. Moving sideways through the space<br />

3. Diagonals<br />

4. Frontal circles, i.e., strew and scoop circles<br />

5. Combinations of the above exercise elements<br />

6. Jumps across the diagonal<br />

7. Combinations<br />

This more or less traditional class structure was varied by<br />

interspersing partner exercises, among other things. Training<br />

was successively and progressively structured according<br />

to the thematic emphases named above.<br />

From a scholarly perspective, this technique specifically<br />

addresses rhythmic ability as a subsection of ‘coordinative<br />

abilities’: 31<br />

→ The ability to perceive rhythm through an individual’s<br />

motor abilities (kinesthetic) and realize such through<br />

the following approaches:<br />

› Demonstration of new movement sequences using<br />

individual phrases, initially without music.<br />

› Recognizing dynamic structure to improve the<br />

execution and quality of movement sequences.<br />

› Determining and training quantitative and<br />

qualitative attributes.<br />

› Attuning what is heard to one’s own motor rhythms<br />

in movement, with frequent repetitions to music,<br />

among other things.<br />

The body should adapt a rhythmic flow to the music.<br />

→ Variation of specific rhythmic processes according to<br />

dynamic, temporal, or spatial criteria.<br />

from the skeleton and its muscular support.”<br />

See on this Daniel Lewis: Illustrierte Tanztechnik<br />

von José Limón. Wilhelmshaven: Florian<br />

Noetzel Verlag, 1990, p. 207.<br />

29 Additional teaching goals can be deduced<br />

from the technique’s central movement<br />

characteristics; see the section Movement<br />

Characteristics and Physicality under Understanding<br />

the Body / Movement.<br />

30 See the DVDs and Class Plan on DVD 1.<br />

31 Coordinative abilities is the “collective<br />

term for the conditions determined by information–reception<br />

and information–processing<br />

processes necessary for realizing movement.”<br />

According to Hirtz, coordinative abilities<br />

include balance, responsiveness, rhythmic<br />

ability, being able to spatially orient oneself,<br />

and kinesthetic differentiation. Hirtz in<br />

Prohl / Röthig 2003, p. 308.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!