01.07.2020 Views

Dance Techniques 2010

What does today's contemporary dance training look like? Seven research teams at well known European dance universities have tackled this question by working with and querying some of contemporary dance s most important teachers: Alan Danielson, Humphrey/Limón Tradition, Anouk van Dijk, Countertechnique, Barbara Passow, Jooss Leeder Technique, Daniel Roberts Cunningham Technique, Gill Clarke Minding Motion, Jennifer Muller Muller Technique, Lance Gries Release and Alignment Oriented Techniques. This comprehensive study includes interviews, scholarly contributions, and supplementary essays, as well as video recordings and lesson plans. It provides a comparative look into historical contexts, movement characteristics, concepts, and teaching methods. A workbook with two training DVDs for anyone involved in dance practice and theory. Ingo Diehl, Friederike Lampert (Eds.), Dance Techniques 2010 – Tanzplan Germany. With two DVDs. Berlin: Henschel 2011. ISBN 978-3-89487-689-0 (Englisch) Out of print.

What does today's contemporary dance training look like? Seven research teams at well known European dance universities have tackled this question by working with and querying some of contemporary dance s most important teachers: Alan Danielson, Humphrey/Limón Tradition, Anouk van Dijk, Countertechnique, Barbara Passow, Jooss Leeder Technique, Daniel Roberts Cunningham Technique, Gill Clarke Minding Motion, Jennifer Muller Muller Technique, Lance Gries Release and Alignment Oriented Techniques.

This comprehensive study includes interviews, scholarly contributions, and supplementary essays, as well as video recordings and lesson plans. It provides a comparative look into historical contexts, movement characteristics, concepts, and teaching methods. A workbook with two training DVDs for anyone involved in dance practice and theory.

Ingo Diehl, Friederike Lampert (Eds.), Dance Techniques 2010 – Tanzplan Germany. With two DVDs. Berlin: Henschel 2011. ISBN 978-3-89487-689-0 (Englisch) Out of print.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anouk van Dijk — Countertechnique<br />

81<br />

As has been pointed out in the chapter Concept and Ideology,<br />

Countertechnique’s understanding of the body is one<br />

without a fixed and localized center. The notion of center<br />

is replaced by a dynamic balance of directions and counter–directions,<br />

and is continually shifting. To create an alternative<br />

stability, the idea of directions in space, distances<br />

in the body, point of views (POV), and sequential thinking<br />

are used. Moving bones, therefore, is always relative to the<br />

perspective that is being used when directing and counter–<br />

directing. Strictly speaking, there is no center.<br />

To move means having the weight of the body at one’s<br />

disposal. If movement is triggered by a particular body<br />

part, this can lead to falling horizontally through space,<br />

which, as has been pointed out, is one of the main principles<br />

in Countertechnique. It appears as if dancers using<br />

Countertechnique are frequently off–center, but what is<br />

called off–center in other techniques is, in Countertechnique,<br />

only a moment of moving through space to get<br />

somewhere else. So falling horizontally is not considered<br />

to be moving off–balance, rather it strives towards a different<br />

notion of balance that is not dependent upon an<br />

upright body.<br />

To consider horizontal falling as one of the basic activities<br />

while dancing automatically implies that gravity and<br />

the weight of the individual body parts are being acknowledged<br />

in every movement. When the body is directed<br />

downward, gravity augments the direction the body is<br />

taking. But with Countertechnique there is never one single<br />

direction of movement. If a body part is going downward<br />

with gravity, the dancer sends the weight of another<br />

body part upward and away from the floor. In this way,<br />

the body is held in limbo between two directions. In order<br />

to establish the dynamic balance that is characteristic of<br />

Countertechnique, the weight of the body is always being<br />

shared by various limbs and thereby directed outward into<br />

space. One might say that when weight is sent off into<br />

space, the burden of the full weight on the dancer’s spine<br />

is relieved. To distribute weight in space, the dancer has<br />

to send energy away from his or her body in two directions;<br />

this minimizes the amount of effort and blocking in<br />

the joints. To begin, there are the basic directions up and<br />

down, side and side, front and back that can be further<br />

elaborated upon by adding different diagonals, circular,<br />

and other spatial trajectories. When various possibilities<br />

are combined, movements will become multidirectional.<br />

In class, Anouk van Dijk reminds students that when sending<br />

energy they should remember the periphery of their<br />

bodies. Energy going through the body has to be sent all<br />

the way out through the fingertips, top of the head, or toes<br />

to prevent it from being held inside the body. By increasing<br />

or decreasing the amount of energy, the dancer can maintain<br />

balance. Sending more energy in one direction implies<br />

moving in that direction.<br />

The principle of sending weight off into space becomes<br />

important in the partnering workshops. Students who grip<br />

muscles and keep the energy inside the body become heavy<br />

for a partner to lift or move. Students who send their energy<br />

outward become lighter and therefore increase their<br />

possibilities for moving or being lifted; they share the<br />

weight with the space around them.<br />

In general, a weight shift might initiate a movement.<br />

More specifically, shifting weight is crucial for directing<br />

and counter–directing. The weight of the head and the<br />

trunk—the trunk being the part of the body from the sit<br />

bones up to the neck—must be directed away from the energy<br />

direction used by the legs. Weight should be sent into<br />

opposite directions in space. If the trunk and the legs move<br />

away from each other, more space is created in the hip<br />

joints, enabling the dancer more freedom in a leg movement.<br />

<strong>Dance</strong>rs who don’t acknowledge the weight shift of<br />

the head and trunk in space, and who then try to achieve<br />

full range in leg movements, will have to use excessive energy<br />

because they have decreased the availability of the<br />

hip joint. Their lower backs will press down on the legs,<br />

thereby restricting the movement radius.<br />

Space is a crucial component of Countertechnique.<br />

Space is an active partner for the dancer, supporting him<br />

or her. The space inside and the space outside the body are<br />

interconnected and are constantly engaged in a dialogue.<br />

The dancer directs energy into the space surrounding him<br />

or her in order to create more space inside the body. Vice<br />

versa, the more space the dancer creates inside the body,<br />

the more the dancer can direct movement into the space<br />

outside.<br />

This concept of space has many implications physically<br />

and mentally, and also on a practical level. In order to<br />

explore the practical possibilities and give students an idea<br />

of how they can use space, Anouk van Dijk takes recourse<br />

to improvisation techniques developed by Forsythe in the<br />

early 1980s. This analytical introduction to spatial orientation<br />

is a practical tool; it provides an overview of the<br />

many possibilities that directing and counter–directing offers<br />

a dancer. In exercises from Van Dijk’s Practical Tools<br />

Workshop, students are asked to begin standing, imagining<br />

a plane with Laban’s nine points in front of them—three<br />

high in front of them, three on the middle level, and three<br />

on the floor. They may send any body part to any of the<br />

nine points. Gradually the exercise becomes more complicated<br />

as planes and levels are added until, ultimately,<br />

students have all twenty-seven points at their disposal.<br />

The exercise increases spatial awareness and three–dimensional<br />

thinking because the entire space is being used. Not<br />

only do students project to the front, they also experience<br />

their bodies as a volume connected to space. Making use<br />

of Laban’s cube for directing and counter–directing implies<br />

that various spatial levels are always available, either<br />

at the same time or in sequence. If a dancer engages in a<br />

falling movement, for instance, he or she will neither fall<br />

straight down nor stop at the floor. They will either continue<br />

to move horizontally along the floor or pass through

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!