01.07.2020 Views

Dance Techniques 2010

What does today's contemporary dance training look like? Seven research teams at well known European dance universities have tackled this question by working with and querying some of contemporary dance s most important teachers: Alan Danielson, Humphrey/Limón Tradition, Anouk van Dijk, Countertechnique, Barbara Passow, Jooss Leeder Technique, Daniel Roberts Cunningham Technique, Gill Clarke Minding Motion, Jennifer Muller Muller Technique, Lance Gries Release and Alignment Oriented Techniques. This comprehensive study includes interviews, scholarly contributions, and supplementary essays, as well as video recordings and lesson plans. It provides a comparative look into historical contexts, movement characteristics, concepts, and teaching methods. A workbook with two training DVDs for anyone involved in dance practice and theory. Ingo Diehl, Friederike Lampert (Eds.), Dance Techniques 2010 – Tanzplan Germany. With two DVDs. Berlin: Henschel 2011. ISBN 978-3-89487-689-0 (Englisch) Out of print.

What does today's contemporary dance training look like? Seven research teams at well known European dance universities have tackled this question by working with and querying some of contemporary dance s most important teachers: Alan Danielson, Humphrey/Limón Tradition, Anouk van Dijk, Countertechnique, Barbara Passow, Jooss Leeder Technique, Daniel Roberts Cunningham Technique, Gill Clarke Minding Motion, Jennifer Muller Muller Technique, Lance Gries Release and Alignment Oriented Techniques.

This comprehensive study includes interviews, scholarly contributions, and supplementary essays, as well as video recordings and lesson plans. It provides a comparative look into historical contexts, movement characteristics, concepts, and teaching methods. A workbook with two training DVDs for anyone involved in dance practice and theory.

Ingo Diehl, Friederike Lampert (Eds.), Dance Techniques 2010 – Tanzplan Germany. With two DVDs. Berlin: Henschel 2011. ISBN 978-3-89487-689-0 (Englisch) Out of print.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176 Historical Context<br />

Sabine Huschka<br />

Historical Context<br />

Time, Place, and<br />

Socio-political Context<br />

Similar to other modern dance techniques, the Cunningham<br />

Technique was developed as an individual training<br />

regiment with the goal of creating an aesthetic spectrum<br />

of movement for the body. Created by Merce Cunningham<br />

(1919–2009), the technique is based on a functional and<br />

physiological understanding about the interplay between<br />

joints and muscles, and on notions about subjecting divergent<br />

positions of the limbs to changing tempos, rhythms,<br />

and spatial directions. While training in tap, modern<br />

dance, and ballet, as well as during his first engagement<br />

with the Martha Graham Company (1939–1945), Cunningham<br />

doggedly pursued questions about performing<br />

radically different styles of movement. With his logical<br />

and functional approach, Cunningham—despite ideological<br />

and aesthetic barriers that typified American dance–<br />

theater in the 1940s and 50s—wove the opposing principles<br />

of modern dance and ballet into a movement complex.<br />

The goal was, within a structured time–space continuum,<br />

to establish a complex of coordinates between divergent<br />

movements that could be physically explored.<br />

The Cunningham Technique was, initially, created as a<br />

personal exercise and training program, and used by Cunningham’s<br />

dancers, as of the early 1950s, as a systematic<br />

training format that should help them learn his choreographic<br />

material. At Black Mountain College during the<br />

1952 summer session, backed by his first influx of financial<br />

support, Cunningham established the Merce Cunningham<br />

<strong>Dance</strong> Company (MCDC)—with Carolyn Brown, Anita<br />

Dencks, Viola Farber, Joanne Melsher, Marianne Preger,<br />

Remy Charlip, and Paul Taylor. A pedagogical format was<br />

developed within the context of his choreographic work. 1<br />

Teaching the technique became increasingly important<br />

for Cunningham in subsequent years in his studio in New<br />

York (established in 1959), because, among other reasons,<br />

it provided him with personal income.<br />

The technique remains in a transformative state until<br />

today; this being a process that happens from the inside–<br />

out, and by which the technique<br />

has become more<br />

and more differentiated<br />

with time. Principles and<br />

exercise sequences emerged<br />

from Cunningham’s choreographic<br />

work, which,<br />

determined by the aleatoric<br />

composition process 2<br />

(i.e., a composition process<br />

based on chance operations<br />

as practiced by the composer<br />

John Cage and others),<br />

confronted dancers<br />

with technical challenges<br />

that bordered on the impossible.<br />

Cunningham’s<br />

entire body of work was<br />

influenced by innovations<br />

in film, as film recording<br />

techniques enabled Cunningham<br />

to modify spatial–temporal concepts in respect<br />

to the phenomenon of motion. In the early 1990s, Cunningham<br />

began using <strong>Dance</strong>Forms—a software program<br />

using animation to generate choreography—as a supplement<br />

to aleatorics. 3<br />

Cunningham taught twice–weekly in his New York<br />

studio until shortly before his death at the age of ninety.<br />

Extracts from his technique classes, which can be seen at<br />

www.merce.org, give insight into his teaching style and<br />

1 Vincent Katz: Black Mountain College.<br />

Cambridge / MA: MIT Press, 2002.<br />

2 From the early 1950s, Cunningham choreographed<br />

movement motifs, phrases, and<br />

sequences, as well as the shape of his pieces,<br />

using elaborate random processes. These<br />

transformed the role of the choreographer<br />

by employing a self–perpetuating and playful<br />

logic. Chance operations overrode decision–<br />

making and the personal taste of the<br />

choreographer. This compositional process<br />

treats movement as an abstract dimension<br />

and confronts the body with the ‘impossible’.<br />

For details, see Huschka 2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!