27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138 Reinforced concrete beams-the ultimate limit state

apply where the moment redistribution leads to a reduction in the bending

moment at a given section; where it leads to an increase in the bending

moment, no restriction is necessary.

In the design of continuous beams it is easy to overlook one important

point. Consider the fixed-end beam in Fig. 4.9-5(a). The elastic bending

moment diagram corresponding to the ultimate loading is shown by the

chain-dotted line in Fig. 4.9-5(b). The full line shows the redistributed

moment diagram for use in the design of the individual cross-sections for

the ultimate limit state. The dotted line is the elastic moment diagram

corresponding to the service loading (see Table 1.5-1 for the Yr factors for

service loads and for ultimate loads). Figure 4.9-5(b) shows that the

region ab, though under a sagging moment at the ultimate condition, is

under a hogging moment at the service condition. The ultimate load

condition requires no top reinforcement in the region ab, and consequently

wide cracks would develop there at the service condition. To guard against

such cracking, BS 8110 imposes the condition that

Mu <1: 0.7Me (4.9-4)

where Mu is the ultimate resistance moment provided at any section of the

member, and Me is the moment at that section obtained from an elastic

maximum-moments diagram covering all appropriate combinations of

ultimate loads.

Equation (4.9-4) is compatible with the above-mentioned 30% limit on

the moment reduction that is permitted in moment redistribution.

Returning to Section 4. 7, it is now clear why the design formulae and

procedure there are stated as valid for only up to 30% moment redistribution.

Note that the design formulae in Section 4.6 imply that xld may

reach 0.5. For xld to reach 0.5, eqn (4.9-3) states that Pb ~ 0.9; in other

words, there must be no more than 10% moment redistribution (see eqn

4.7-2). Hence the design formulae and procedure in Section 4.6 are valid

only for up to 10% moment redistribution.

Example 4.9-1

The span lengths of a three-span continuous beam ABCD are: exterior

spans AB and CD, 8 m each; interior span BC, 10m. The characteristic

Elastic (ultimate load)

(a)

(b)

Fig. 4.9-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!