27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 Axially /oaded reinforced concrete co/umns

Because of the bond between the reinforcement and the concrete, they will

have equal strains under load (bond will be discussed in Chapter 6).

Therefore, from the condition of compatibility,

fel Ee = J.! Es

(concrete strain = steel strain) (3.3-2)

where Ee and Es are respectively the modulus of elasticity of the concrete

(see Table 2.5-6) and the steel; the modulus of elasticity of steel is usually

taken as 200 kN/mm 2 in design.

From eqns (3.3-1) and (3.3-2),

i.e.

t. - N

e - Ae + aeAsc

ţ = aeN

s Ae + aeAse

(3.3-3)

(3.3-4)

fs = aefe (3.3-5)

where ae = Esi Ee is called the modular ratio.

In eqns (3.3-3) and (3.3-4), the quantity Ae + aeAse represents the

concrete area plus ae times the steel area, and is of ten referred to as the

are a of the transformed section or equivalent section. Therefore, when the

stresses are within the linear ranges in Figs 3.2-1(a) and 3.2-2(a), the

concrete stress fe is obtained by dividing the load N by the are a of the

transformed section, and the steel stress fs is ae times fe.

EtTects of creep and shrinkage

Equations (3.3-3) and (3.3-4) may give the false impression that the

stresses fe and fs in a given column are uniquely defined once the load N is

specified. In fact, it is almost impossible to determine these stresses

accurately; this is because of the effects of the creep and shrinkage of the

concrete. What we are quite certain of, however, is that in practice the

steel stressfs is usually much larger than that given by eqn (3.3-4) and the

concrete stressfe is much less than that given by eqn (3.3-3). First consider

creep, which was discussed in Section 2.5(b). It is clear from Fig. 2.5-3

that if concrete is subjected to a sustained stress, the total strain is the

elastic strain plus the creep strain, and this increases with time. Therefore,

unless the load N is applied only for a short time (and this is rarely

the case with columns in actual structures), the modulus Ee in eqn (3.3-2)

must be the etTective modulus of elasticity defined as the ratio of the stress

to the total strain for the particular duration of loading concerned;

simiIarly, the etTective modular ratio must be used in eqns (3.3-3) to

(3.3-5). Creep reduces the effective modulus of elasticity of the concrete

and hence increases the effective modular ratio. If the effective values of ac

for various durations of loading are inserted in eqns (3.3-3) and (3.3-4) it

will be found that for the column under a contant load, there is a gradual

but significant redistribution of stress with time: the concrete gradually

sheds off the load it carries and this is picked up by the steel. This

redistribution may continue for years untiI the effective modular ratio

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!