27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Analysis of framed structure (BS 8110) 407

11.4 The analysis of framed structure (BS 8110)

11.4(a)

General comments

Although the now normally accepted method of section design is based on

ultimate conditions, the stage of development of corresponding methods

of structural analysis for concrete structures is such that further work is

needed before they can be accepted (see Section 4.9 and References 17,

18). In current design practice, elastic analysis is normally used to obtain

the member forces and bending moments in structural frames. A redistribution

of these moments as explained in Section 4.9 is permitted, to

make allowance for what may happen under ultimate conditions.

In the analysis of the structure to determine the member forces and

bending moments, the properties of materials (e.g. the modulus of

elasticity-see Table 2.5-6) should be those associated with their characteristic

strengths, irrespective of which limit state is being considered.

According to BS 8110: Clause 2.5.2, the relative stiffness of the members

may be based on the second moment of area/, calculated on any of the

following sections (but a consistent approach should be used for all

elements of the structure):

(1) The concrete section: The entire concrete cross-section, ignoring

the reinforcement.

(2) The gross section: the entire concrete cross-section, including the

reinforcement on the basis of the modular ratio ac, which may be

taken as 15.

(3) The transformed section: the compression area of the concrete crosssection

combined with the reinforcement on the basis of the modular

ratio ac, which may be taken as 15.

The I.Struct.E. Manual [20] additionally gives the following recommendation

for calculating the stiffness of Hanged beams: the flange width ofTbeams

may be taken as the actual flange width, or 0.14 times the effective

span plus the web width, whichever is the less; the flange width of L-beams

may be taken as the actual flange width, or 0.07 times the effective span

plus the web width, whichever is the less.

BS 8110 allows a structure to be analysed by partitioning it into subframes.

The sub-frames that can be used depend on the type of structure

being analysed, namely braced or unbraced, since a rigid frame's reaction

is different for the two cases. A braced frame is designed to resist vertical

loads only; therefore the building must incorporate, in some other way, the

resistance to lateral loading and sidesway. Such resistance can be provided

by bearing walls, shear walls or cores, truss or tubular systems [16]. It is

obviously better to provide a regular and symmetrical system of stiffening

walls [16], as otherwise lateral loading may also induce undesirable

torsional effects in the frames that are being assumed to resist vertical

loads only. The unbraced frame, where the building incorporates none of

these stiffening systems, has to be designed to resist both vertical and

lateral loads.

BS 8110 allows the moments, loads and shear forces in the individual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!