27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Structural behaviour 233

CUrve II

(Unsymmetrical

longitudinal

relnforcement)

T

To

T 1

To

o 0·5

MIMo

(a) Behaviour

1·0

o~------~--------~

1

MIMo

(b) Design

Fig.6.10-1 Interaction oftorsion and bending [44]

For the particular case of (h = 1, their curve again resembles Hsu's curve

(1).

In current design practice, the reinforcements for torsion and bending

are calculated separately and then added together. The rationale for this

procedure is illustrated in Fig. 6.1O-1(b) [44]. In the figure, the ordinate

TI Tu = 1 on the vertical axis represents the strength in pure torsion of the

member with torsional reinforcement only; the abscissa MI Mu = 1 on the

horizontal axis represents the strength in pure bending of the same

member with flexural reinforcement only. Point C represents the design

procedure of adding torsional and flexural reinforcements. As Hsu and

Kemp [44] have pointed out, the addition of the torsional and flexural

reinforcements increases both the pure torsion and the pure bending

strengths, as illustrated by points A and B.

The interaction oftorsion and shear is not quite understood [33-35]. For

beams without links, a circular interaction curve has been suggested

[44, 45]:

(iuY + (~Y = 1 (6.10-2)

where T and V are the torsion and shear combination that can be resisted,

Tu is the strength in pure torsion and Vu that in shear (and the accompanying

bending). Insufficient test data are available for beams with links. In

British design practice, as explained in Section 6.10(a), the reinforcements

are calculated separately for torsion and for shear and are then added

together.

The behaviour of members in combined torsion, bending aud shear is

even less understood [33-35]. For design purposes, it would seem to be

conservative to calculate reinforcement requirements separately and then

add them together [43, 47]; as Goode [38] has pointed out, the loading

arrangement which gives the maximum torsional moment may not

simultaneously give the maximum bending and shear.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!