27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Yield-line analysis 293

8.2 Yield-line analysis

The yield-line theory pioneered by Johansen [2, 3] is an ultimate-load

theory for slab design and is based on assumed collapse mechanisms

and plastic properties of under-reinforced slabs. The assumed collapse

mechanism is defined by a pattern of yield lines, along. which the

reinforcement has yielded and the location of which depends on the

loading and boundary conditions. For the yield-line theory to be valid,

shear failures, bond failures and primary compression failures in flexure

must all be prevented. The moment/curvature relationship must resemble

that of Fig. 4. 9-1, having a long horizontal portion when the yield capacity

of the slab is reached; in practice, this restriction presents no difficulties

because slabs are usually very much under-reinforced.

Figure 8.2-1 shows some tyRical yield-line patterns for slabs in the

collapse state under uniformly dtstributed loads. A full line represents a

positive yield line caused by a sagging yield moment, so that the concrete

cracks in tension on the bottom face of the slab; a broken line represents

a negative yield line caused by a hogging yield moment so that tensile

cracking occurs on the top face. The convention for support conditions is as

follows: single hatching represents a simply supported edge, double

hatching represents a built-in edge, while a line by itself represents a free

edge. The following comments [3] should be noted:

Yield

lines

(a)

Simple support

(b)

Fig. 8.2-1

Simple support

(c)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!