27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Problems 329

Problems

8.1 In yield-line analysis, where a slab is reinforced with both top and

bottom reinforcements, the assumption is made that the sagging yield

moment m may be calculated from the bottom steel A. by ignoring the

existence of the top steel; similarly, it is assumed that the hogging yield

moment may be calculated from the top steel A~ by ignoring the existence

of the bottom steel. Comment critically on the error introduced by this

assumption, which amounts to ignoring completely any interaction

between the top and bottom reinforcement bars.

Ans.

See Example 8.4-4 if necessary.

8.2 An isotropically reinforced slab is simply supported along two edges

and carries a uniformly distributed load. For a collapse mode consisting of

a single yield line from the vertex to the free edge, verify that the worst

layout is when the yield line bisects the angle between the two supported

edges, i.e. when a = f/J/2. (See Example 8.5-2: Comment (a) at the end

of the solution.)

Problem8.2

8.3 A rectangular slab, simply supported along all four edges, is

isotropicaly reinforced to give a yield moment of 27 kNm per metre width

am

T

~~~LLLL~~~~~i/

6111

1~~

·I

Problem8.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!