27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Traditional mix design method 51

required for a target mean strength of 30 N/mm 2 • However, the durability

requirement imposes another ceiling on the w/c ratio. For most structural

concrete, it is advisable to keep the w/c ratio below, say, 0.60 irrespective

of the strength requirement; where the concrete member will in service be

exposed to freezing temperatures when wet, the w/c ratio should be kept

below, say, 0.45.

The workability required for various types of construction is given in

Table 2.6-2; Table 2.7-1 then gives the aggregate/cement ratio, which

depends on the shape, grading and maximum size of the aggregate. The

shapes of the aggregates referred to in Table 2.7-1 are (a) rounded, such

as beach gravel, (b) irregular, such as water-worn river gravels, and (c)

angular, such as crushed rocks. Corresponding to each degree of workability,

the table gives aggregate/cement ratios for four gradings of

aggregates which are shown in Fig. 2. 7-1: grading No. 1 has the lowest

proportion of fine material, while grading No. 4 has the highest proportion.

The lower the proportion of fine material, the lower is the water

content required for a given workability; in other words a higher aggregate/cement

ratio can be used. On the other hand, where the reinforcement

is congested or where it is desired to have concrete surfaces that

present a good appearance on removal of the formwork, a higher

proportion oflfine material is advantageous. Note that Table 2.7-1 refers

to aggregates of 10 mm maximum size. In general, as the maximum size of

the aggregate increases, a higher aggregate/cement ratio may be used, and

vice versa. As a very rough guide, the aggregate/cement ratios in Table

2. 7-1 may be increased by about 10% if the maximum size of the

Cl

100------~----~------~----~~----~----~~--~

90·~----~----~~----~------~----~------~-,~

801~----~----~~----~------~----~------~~~

.E 701~-----+------+-------~----~------~~~~~~~~

m

a eo

8,50

~401~-----+------+-------~~~~~~--+-~~-4~----~

c

~30

& 20~----~--~~~~~~~~t=--~~----t-----,

10~----~~~~-·~~~~----~~----~----~~--~

oL---~~~~--l_ __ L_ __ L_ __ L_~

150~m 300~m 600~m 1-18mm 2·36mm

(No.1()()) (No. 52) (No.25) (No.14) (No.7)

B S Sieve size

Fig. 2.7-1 Grading curves for 10 mm aggregate [32]

5mm

<d. in>

10mm

(fin)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!