27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

414 Practical design and detailing

accuracy when applied to relevant continuous beams. This example does

show, however, the main danger in the use of such coefficients in that they

give no indication even of the possibility of a hogging moment at the centre

of this three-span continuous beam (which was clearly shown in Fig.

4.9-7(b) ). This possibility should always be considered when such

coefficients are used.

This continuous beam sub-frame (Fig. 11.4-1(g)) is an idealization

which ignores any end fixity that may be imparted by the columns. If this

sub-frame is used in a rigid frame analysis, as here, it is obviously prudent

to provide some reinforcement in the top of the beam at the ends A and D

even though the sub-frame analysis does not indicate any such need. In

Example 11.4-1(b) that follows, it will be seen that the value at the end

(110 kNm) is some 57% of the initial fixed end moment (192 kNm). This

is because of the high stiffnesses of the columns relative to that of the

beam, and the normal figure may well be somewhat less. Hence, a value of

some 30-40% of the initial fixed end moment may be more appropriate for

use in design.

Example 11.4-l(b)

With reference to the braced frame in Example 11.4-1(a) and Fig. 11.4-3,

calculate the maximum sagging moment in the span BC; use the sub-frame

of Fig. 11.4-1 (b). Compare the moment so calculated with that shown in

Fig. 4.9-6: Case 2.

SOLUTION

For clarity, Fig. 11.4-1(b) is redrawn as Fig. 11.4-4, which also shows the

relevant dimensions and loadings.

For the dead and imposed loading as above, and using the method of

moment distribution with relative EI values as given in Fig. 11.4-3:

Distribution factors (DF) (Table 11.4-3):

At A, D:

At B, C:

LCO!S (2 X 2/3) 0.667/0.792 84%

AB (2/8) 0.125/0.792 16%

BA: (Lcols): BC = 2/8: (2 - 2/3): 2/10

= 14%: 75%: 11%

36kN/m

A B

1-

Bm

·I-

122kN/m

36 kN/m

c D

10m Bm ..j

.T

+

3m

3m

j_

Fig.ll.4-4 Storey sub-frame

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!