27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 Properties of structural concrete

known and it is prudent to use a higher margin than 1.64 times the

estimated standard deviation. For example, where the required characteristic

strength is 20 N/mm 2 or above, a margin of about 15 N/mm 2 should

be used in the initial mix design [37]. When a reasonably large number of

test results becomes available, the current margin is 1.64a. The use of small

samples in statistical analysis introduces undesirable unknowns. Forty tests

may be regarded as an approximate dividing line between large samples

and small samples. BS 8110 does not give much guidance on this point.

For characteristic strengths exceeding 20 N/mm 2 , the old code CP 110

recommends that where 40 test results are available, the current margin is

to be taken as l.64a or 7.5 N/mm 2 , whichever is greater; where 100 test

results are available, it may be taken as 1.64aor 3.75 N/mm 2 , whichever is

greater.

From the above discussions it is clear that the target mean strength to be

used in the mix design increases with the standard deviation. The poorer

the quality control, the higher the standard deviation, and the higher will

be the necessary target mean strength. A higher target mean strength will

increase the cost of manufacture. On the other hand, to reduce the

standard deviation will require better quality control and, therefore, higher

cost. In practice a compromise is necessary.

Table 2.8-1 gives some idea of the standard deviations that might be

expected under different conditions. The fact that Table 2.8-1 shows

standard deviations rather than coefficients of variation (see eqn 1.3-6)

might give the impression that the standard deviation is independent of the

mean strength level. Whether this is so, or whether it is the coefficient of

variation that is independent of the mean strength level, has led to some

controversy. Experience indicates that, above a strength level of about 20

N/mm 2 , the standard deviation seems to be fairly independent of the

strength level [37]. Below this level, it is more reasonable to assume that

the coefficient of variation is independent of the strength level.

The standard deviation [37] on about 60% of the sites in the UK is

between 4.5 and 7.0 N/mm2 . Values much lower than 4N/mm 2 can seldom

be achieved in practice, because the variability due to sampling and testing

alone corresponds to a standard deviation of the order of 2.3N/mm 2 ; also,

the variation due to the cement (of a nominally specified type) can

sometimes correspond to a standard deviation of 3-3.6 N/mm 2 .

Table 2.8-1 Standard deviations under different conditions

Conditions

Good control with weight hatching, use of

graded aggregates, etc. Constant supervision

Fair control with weight hatching. Use of two

sizes of aggregates. Occasional supervision

Poor control. Inaccurate volume hatching of

all-in aggregates. No supervision

Standard deviation (N/mm 2 )

4-5

5-7

7-8 and above

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!