27.06.2021 Views

F. K. Kong MA, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIStructE, R. H. Evans CBE, DSc, D ès Sc, DTech, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIMechE, FIStructE (auth.)-Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete-Springer US (1987)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Design and detailing-illustrative examples 193

Fig. 5. 7-3 Tension bars at support

clear distance between bars = 160 mm.

From Fig. 5.7-3,

Comments

(a)

ab + 2( 40 + 16 + 20 + 20) = 325

ab = 133 mm < 160 mm OK

(ac + 2~y = (4o + 2~y + (76 + 2~y

ac = 89.48 mm > ~ of 160 mm

(see Comment (a) below)

The corner distance ac is 89.48 mm and exceeds the BS 8110 limit in

Fig. 5.4-1. One possible remedial action is, of course, to carry out a

crack-width calculation (see Section 5.6). However, Example 5.4-1:

solution part (c) explains an easier remedial action. That is, we shall

take advantage of the fact that As, prov is greater than As, req and

use the reduced Is value to obtain a relaxed bar spacing from eqn

(5.4-2).

From Example 4.11-1, As,req = 572 mm 2 and As.prov = 628 mm 2 •

Hence, from eqn (5.3-1(b)),

f, = ~ f, As. req _!_

s 8 y As. prov /Jb

= i(460)(~~~)(t)

= 261 N/mm 2

Substituting into eqn (5.4-2),

. 47000 47000

clear spacmg = ---rs- = 261 = 180 mm

Therefore, we now have

ac = 89.48 mm <!of 180 mm OK

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!