09.12.2022 Views

Operations and Supply Chain Management The Core

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING chapter 9 291

WEEK

NET

REQUIREMENTS

PRODUCTION

QUANTITY

HOLDING

COST

SETUP

COST

TOTAL

COST

UNIT

COST

1 105 105 $ 0.00 $100.00 $100.00 $0.9524

1−2 80 185 8.00 100.00 108.00 0.5838

1−3 130 315 34.00 100.00 134.00 0.4254

1−4 50 365 49.00 100.00 149.00 0.4082

1−5 0 365 49.00 100.00 149.00 0.4082

1−6 200 565 149.00 100.00 249.00 0.4407

1−7 125 690 224.00 100.00 324.00 0.4696

1−8 100 790 294.00 100.00 394.00 0.4987

6 200 200 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.5000

6−7 125 325 12.50 100.00 112.50 0.3462

6−8 100 425 32.50 100.00 132.50 0.3118

For the first order, the least unit cost results from ordering enough to cover weeks 1 through 5, so our

first order would be for 365 units. (This example can be a bit tricky—we have to use a little common

sense.) Ordering for weeks 1–4 has the same low unit cost because there is no demand for week 5.

We will say we are ordering for weeks 1–5 so that we don’t place an unnecessary order in week 5

to cover demand for weeks 5–8. For the second order, the lowest unit cost comes from ordering for

weeks 6–8, so we would plan for an order of 425 units. As with the LTC example, our second order

might change as we learn net requirements for weeks 9 and beyond. Based on these orders, we can

now develop an order schedule based on LUC.

WEEK

NET

REQUIREMENTS

PRODUCTION

QUANTITY

ENDING

INVENTORY

HOLDING

COST

SETUP

COST

TOTAL

COST

1 105 365 260 $26.00 $100.00 $126.00

2 80 0 180 18.00 0.00 144.00

3 130 0 50 5.00 0.00 149.00

4 50 0 0 0.00 0.00 149.00

5 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 149.00

6 200 425 225 22.50 100.00 271.50

7 125 0 100 10.00 0.00 281.50

8 100 0 0 0.00 0.00 281.50

Best Lot Size Method

Based on the data we have available, the total costs for each lot-sizing method are lot-for-lot, $800.00;

EOQ, $350.40; LTC, $359.00; and LUC, $281.50. The relatively high setup cost in this example

makes lot-for-lot an unwise choice. LUC has the lowest total cost by a significant margin. It works so

well here because it minimizes holding costs across the planning horizon.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

LO9–1

LO9–2

LO9–3

1. What do we mean when we say that MRP is based on dependent demand?

2. Discuss the importance of the master production schedule in an MRP system.

3. Explain the need for time fences in the master production schedule.

4. “MRP just prepares shopping lists. It does not do the shopping or cook the

dinner.” Comment.

5. What are the sources of demand in an MRP system? Are these dependent or

independent, and how are they used as inputs to the system?

6. State the types of data that would be carried in the bill-of-materials file and the

inventory record file.

7. Discuss the meaning of MRP terms such as planned-order release and scheduled

order receipt.

8. Why is the MRP process referred to as an “explosion”?

9. Many practitioners currently update MRP weekly or biweekly. Would it be more

valuable if it were updated daily? Discuss.

10. Should safety stock be necessary in an MRP system with dependent demand? If

so, why? If not, why do firms carry it anyway?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!