09.12.2022 Views

Operations and Supply Chain Management The Core

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

336 OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

To find the probability of a defective unit, we need to find the Z-scores of the LCL and

USL with respect to the current process:

LSL − X ​

​Z​ LSL ​ = ​ ________ ​= ​ _________ 5.97 − 5.99

​ = − 2.00 NORM.S.DIST(− 2.00) = 0.02275​

σ 0.01

2.275 percent of the output will be too small.

USL − X ​

​Z​ LSL ​ = ​ ________ ​= ​ _________ 6.03 − 5.99

​ = 4.00 NORM.S.DIST(4.00) = 0.999968​

σ 0.01

The probability of too large a unit is 1 − 0.999968 = 0.000032, so 0.0032 percent of output

will be too small.

The probability of producing a defective unit is 0.02275 + 0.000032 = 0.022782, so

2.2782 percent of output will be defective. As a numerical example, 22,782 out of every

million units will be defective.

b. ​ X ​ = 6.00 LSL = 6.00 − 0.03 = 5.97 USL = 6.00 + 0.03 = 6.03 σ = 0.01​

​C​ pk ​ = min ​ ​ _ 6.00 − 5.97

​ or ​ _ 6.03 − 6.00

​ = min [1.00 or 1.00] = 1.00​

[ 0.03

0.03

​]

​Z​ LSL ​ = ​ ________ LSL − X ¯ ​ ​

​= ​ _________ 5.97 − 6.00

​ = − 3.00 NORM.S.DIST(− 3.00) = 0.00135​

σ 0.01

Only 0.135 percent of the output will be too small.

​Z​ USL ​ = ​ ________ USL − X ¯ ​ ​

​= ​ _________ 6.03 − 6.00

​ = 3.00 NORM.S.DIST(3.00) = 0.99865​

σ 0.01

The probability of too large a unit is 1 − 0.99865 = 0.00135, so 0.135 percent of the output

will be too large.

The probability of producing a defective unit is 0.00135 + 0.00135 = 0.0027, so

0.27 percent of the output will be defective. As a numerical example, 2,700 out of every

million units will be defective. That’s about a 90 percent reduction in defective output just

from adjusting the process mean!

Because the process is exactly centered on the target and the specification limits are three

standard deviations away from the process mean, this adjusted process has a C pk = 1.00. In

order to do any better than that, we would need to reduce the variation in the process, as

shown in part (c).

c. ​ X ​ = 6.00 LSL = 6.00 − 0.03 = 5.97 USL = 6.00 + 0.03 = 6.03 σ = 0.005​

​C​ pk ​ = min ​ ​ _ 6.00 − 5.97

​ or ​ _ 6.03 − 6.00

​ = min [2.00 or 2.00] = 2.00​

[ 0.015

0.015

​]

We have doubled the process capability index by cutting the standard deviation of the process

in half. What will be the effect on the probability of defective output?

LSL − X ​

​Z​ LSL ​ = ​ ________ ​= ​ _________ 5.97 − 6.00

​ = − 6.00 NORM.S.DIST(− 6.00) = 0.0000000009866

σ 0.005

USL − X ​

​Z​ USL ​ = ​ ________ ​= ​ _________ 6.03 − 6.00

​ = 6.00 NORM.S.DIST(6.00) = 0.9999999990134

σ 0.005

Following earlier logic, the probability of producing a defective unit in this case is just

0.000000001973, a very small probability indeed! Using the earlier numerical example, this

would result in only 0.001973 defective units out of every million. By cutting the process

standard deviation in half, we could gain far more than a 50 percent reduction in defective

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!