09.12.2022 Views

Operations and Supply Chain Management The Core

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

346 OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Put yourself in the position of a manager at Tesla responsible

for quality and customer satisfaction. What would you

suggest relative to the following questions?

Questions

1. Consumer Reports, the service that reports unbiased

testing and ratings on cars (together with about everything

else we buy), recommends avoiding new cars in

their first year of production, especially those loaded

with new technology. What can Tesla do to refute this

recommendation?

2. How should Tesla “manage” the delivery of the new

Model 3 during the initial production rampup? Think

about this relative to where cars should be delivered

geographically and how the service process should be

designed.

3. Should Tesla deliver cars to customers on a first-come,

first-served basis (i.e., in the order of when deposits

were placed)?

4. What other suggestions would you have for Tesla relative

to ensuring the quality of its new Model 3 car?

Case Part B: Quality

Control Analytics

As part of the process for improving the quality of their cars,

engineers have identified a potential improvement to the

process that makes a washer that is used in the accelerator

assembly. The tolerances on the thickness of the washer are

fairly large since the fit can be loose, but if it does happen to

get too large, it can cause the accelerator to bind and create a

potential problem for the driver. (Note: This part of the case

has been fabricated for teaching purposes.)

Let’s assume that as a first step to improving the process,

a sample of 40 washers coming from the machine that

produces the washers was taken and the thickness measured

in millimeters. The following table has the measurements

from the sample:

1.9 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.2 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.8

1.8 2.2 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.6 1.8 1.6

2.1 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.9

2.1 2.0 2.4 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.2

Questions

1. If the specification is such that no washer should

be greater than 2.4 millimeters, assuming that the

thicknesses are distributed normally, what fraction

of the output is expected to be greater than this

thickness?

2. If there are upper and lower specifications, where the

upper thickness limit is 2.4 and the lower thickness

limit is 1.4, what fraction of the output is expected to

be out of tolerance?

3. What is the C pk for the process?

4. What would be the C pk for the process if it were centered

between the specification limits (assume the process

standard deviation is the same)?

5. What percentage of output would be expected to be

out of tolerance if the process were centered?

6. Set up ​ X ¯ ​and range control charts for the current process.

Assume the operators will take samples of 10

washers at a time.

7. Plot the data on your control charts. Does the current

process appear to be in control?

8. If the process could be improved so that the standard

deviation were only about 0.10 millimeter, what would

be the best that could be expected with the processes

relative to the fraction defective?

PRACTICE EXAM

1. This refers to the inherent value of the product in the

marketplace and is a strategic decision for the firm.

2. Relates to how well a product or service meets design

specifications.

3. Relates to how the customer views quality dimensions

of a product or service.

4. The series of international quality standards.

5. What is the enemy of good quality?

6. A Six Sigma process that is running at the center of its

control limits would expect this defect rate.

7. The standard quality improvement methodology

developed by General Electric.

8. Variation that can be clearly identified and possibly

managed.

9. Variation inherent in the process itself.

10. If a process has a capability index of 1 and is running

normally (centered on the mean), what percentage of

the units would one expect to be defective?

11. An alternative to viewing an item as simply good or

bad due to it falling in or out of the tolerance range.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!