27.12.2012 Views

The 1995/1996 Household Income, Expenditure - (PDF, 101 mb ...

The 1995/1996 Household Income, Expenditure - (PDF, 101 mb ...

The 1995/1996 Household Income, Expenditure - (PDF, 101 mb ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.11<br />

results over time. Females consume more than expected. <strong>The</strong> intercept is<br />

smaller, indicating the decline in budget shares of food and beverages over<br />

time. In general, the coefficient values, model fit, and importance of the<br />

variables are quite good, pointing to the robustness of the equivalence scale<br />

models. <strong>The</strong> use of a standard equivalence scale would not be appropriate.<br />

More will be said about the use of the equivalence scales in the Appendix to<br />

the next chapter, but for now it is enough to suggest that any critical<br />

household estimate might be adjusted to account for household size, sex and<br />

age characteristics using the predictive coefficients.<br />

Another adjustment which really must be made to economic estimates<br />

over time is deflating to control for general price increases. It is standard<br />

practice to deflate prices by some index of the cost of living, and usually the<br />

Consumer Price Index (CPI) serves this function well enough. In Egypt's<br />

case, however, the CPI is measured with so much error that "adjustment" of<br />

level data merely serves to confound the bias inherent in the statistic itself<br />

(CPI measurement error is the subject of Chapter V). Still, some adjustment<br />

must be made, and in the absence of an alternative measure of cost of living<br />

increases, the official CPI produced by CAPMAS must be used. Table II.10<br />

sets out a comparison of expenditures, incomes, and wages from two periods,<br />

adjusted and not adjusted by household equivalence, the official all items CPI,<br />

and thi food only CPL Means are presented by SAS-generated standard<br />

errors, as well as medians. <strong>The</strong> official CPI index used is March, <strong>1996</strong>, the<br />

midpoint of data collection for the <strong>1995</strong>/<strong>1996</strong> HIECS. Here it is appropriate to<br />

explain the existence of two income estimates from the old data. <strong>The</strong> CAPMAS<br />

publication estimates from the 1990/1991 HIECS were from the NEWINC.SD2 data<br />

set, produced by an incorrect and non-complete household-level merge of<br />

individual nu<strong>mb</strong>er codes with the individual nu<strong>mb</strong>er codes of a separate<br />

income source questionnaire. <strong>The</strong> INDV.SD2 income estimates are based on the<br />

merging of individual-level demographic codes and their income sources,<br />

summed by household.<br />

<strong>The</strong> median value of an estimate - half of households have a value less<br />

than the median, the other half have a value greater than the median - is a<br />

better statistic than the mean for capturing the idea of relativeness. It is<br />

much better when the median rises than when the mean rises. Based on the<br />

assumptions, the conclusions about median estimates follow from Table 11.10:<br />

6 <strong>The</strong> fact that the standard errors are created by SAS and therefore<br />

generated under the assumption of a simple random sample design should not<br />

detract from their usefulness in making asymptotic inferences. In many cases<br />

the standard errors can be inflated by a factor of the design effect shown for<br />

the statistic in previous tables.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!