30.12.2012 Views

Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Handbook: Production and

Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Handbook: Production and

Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Handbook: Production and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1138 TABLET COMPRESSION<br />

P P<br />

= +<br />

C a ab<br />

1 (4)<br />

V0−V C =<br />

V<br />

In the Kawakita equation the particle density is not introduced in the calculations<br />

since the model operates on the relative change in volume, which gives the same<br />

result whether the relative or the absolute volume is used. The problem in the calculation<br />

of this equation is to fi nd the correct initial volume V 0 .<br />

6.6.3<br />

COMPACTIBILITY<br />

Compactibility of a powdered mixture is defi ned as the ability of the material to be<br />

compressed into a tablet of a specifi ed strength without changing its composition.<br />

Investigations have demonstrated that binary mixes of identical composition could<br />

have different organizations, depending on the surface energy <strong>and</strong> particle size of<br />

the fraction used. Actually, it has been demonstrated that it is possible to control<br />

the organization of binary mixes by modifying the particle sizes of the fractions<br />

blended if they have the appropriate surface energies [6] .<br />

Generally, only powders that form hard compacts under an applied pressure<br />

without exhibiting any tendency to cap or chip can be considered as readily<br />

compactible. The compactibility of pharmaceutical powders can be characterized<br />

by its tensile strength <strong>and</strong> indentation hardness, which can be used to determine<br />

three dimensionless parameters: strain index, bonding index, <strong>and</strong> brittle fracture<br />

index.<br />

To calculate the work of compaction during tableting, it is necessary to have<br />

accurate values of force <strong>and</strong> punch displacement. Differences in the dynamics of<br />

powder densifi cation between eccentric <strong>and</strong> rotary machines were pointed out by<br />

Palmieri et al. [14] after compression of microcrystalline cellulose, lactose monohydrate,<br />

<strong>and</strong> dicalcium phosphate dehydrate at different compression pressures. The<br />

effect of the longer dwell time of the rotary machine press on the porosity reduction<br />

after the maximum pressure is reached is more noticeable in a ductile material such<br />

as microcrystalline cellulose. It has been shown that Heckel parameters obtained in<br />

the rotary press are in some cases different from those recovered in the eccentric<br />

machine because of the longer dwell time, machine defl ection, <strong>and</strong> punch tilting<br />

occurring in the rotary press, although theoretically they could better describe the<br />

material densifi cation in a high - speed production rotary machine.<br />

Williams <strong>and</strong> McGinity [15] studied <strong>and</strong> compared the compaction properties of<br />

microcrystalline cellulose from six different sources using tableting indices. It was<br />

demonstrated that storage of compacts at elevated humidity conditions prior to<br />

determining the tableting indices decreased the magnitude of the tensile strength,<br />

dynamic indentation hardness, <strong>and</strong> bonding index. Based on the differences in<br />

physicomechanical properties observed for the tableting indices, the authors stated<br />

that microcrystalline cellulose products from different sources are not directly interchangeable<br />

<strong>and</strong> showed that the tensile strength, indentation hardness, bonding<br />

index, <strong>and</strong> brittle fracture index for compacts composed of microcrystalline cellu-<br />

0<br />

(5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!