13.01.2013 Views

D:\Documents and Settings\Ana\My Documents\Biserka-knjiga ...

D:\Documents and Settings\Ana\My Documents\Biserka-knjiga ...

D:\Documents and Settings\Ana\My Documents\Biserka-knjiga ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Digital Culture: The Changing Dynamics<br />

information always, <strong>and</strong> necessarily, refer to the essence of community <strong>and</strong> human<br />

relations” (Pasquali, 2003: 198). For Hamelink “information contents are cultural<br />

products. Information is a part of a society’s cultural fabric. Among the important<br />

issues of this dimension are the sharing of knowledge <strong>and</strong> the protection of cultural<br />

identity” (Hamelink, 2003: 124). Thus he claims that the ways in which societies deal<br />

with the provision <strong>and</strong> processing of information is determined by cultural<br />

perspectives. His underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the concept of communication is wider than just<br />

the transfer of messages <strong>and</strong> he states that to communicate “refers to a process of<br />

sharing, making common or creating a community” (Hamelink, 2003: 155). Cultural<br />

expressions, like language, are systems of signs for communication, <strong>and</strong> through<br />

common cultural codes people construct their underst<strong>and</strong>ing of their environment<br />

<strong>and</strong> create shared (thus common) meanings. James Carey also differentiates between<br />

two views of communication: the first one he calls “the transmission view of<br />

communication” whereby messages are transmitted <strong>and</strong> distributed in space for the<br />

control of distance <strong>and</strong> people; the other is “the ritual view of communication” i.e.<br />

representation of shared beliefs within a community. The transmission view is<br />

commonly defined by terms such as sending, transmitting or giving information to<br />

others, while the ritual view is directed not towards the extension of messages in<br />

space but towards the maintenance of society in time through the representation of<br />

shared beliefs (Carey, 1992). Communication as transmission represents the building<br />

blocks upon which communication as a ritual is based.<br />

So, when we talk about culture, communication is implicit. As Foresta tells us,<br />

“each society constantly recreates itself through communication by constantly<br />

redefining its collective reality, its culture” <strong>and</strong> “culture is a memory, collective<br />

memory, dependent on communication for its creation, extension, evolution <strong>and</strong><br />

preservation” (Foresta, Mergier, Serexhe, 1995: 19). Knowledge has always been<br />

communicated <strong>and</strong> embedded (thus preserved) through our cultural communication<br />

structures <strong>and</strong> available technologies have always been an important element that<br />

enabled <strong>and</strong> facilitated these processes of creating, sharing <strong>and</strong> preserving our<br />

cultural memory.<br />

Digital culture - new social ecology<br />

The claim that technology impacts different aspects of our culture is over-simplified<br />

<strong>and</strong> too deterministic, but it is not completely wrong. We are aware of the changes<br />

that happened in present-day societies that are related to introducing ICT into our<br />

lives in the same way as electricity in the past. We could say that all technologies<br />

intervene in the human environment <strong>and</strong> modify it to a certain extent, thus changing<br />

the conditions of existence of different cultures (in a more or less radical way). They<br />

make certain practices obsolete while some previously difficult <strong>and</strong> impractical<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!