Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Low-Temperature Conduction of a <strong>Quantum</strong> Dot 109<br />
not reproduce it here, referring the reader <strong>to</strong> the original papers [34, 35] and<br />
reviews [15, 17, 20]) instead.<br />
An order-of-magnitude estimate of the average height of the peak can be<br />
obtain<strong>ed</strong> by replacing Γα0 in (37) byΓα, see (22), which yields<br />
δE<br />
Gpeak ∼ G∞<br />
T<br />
. (38)<br />
This is by a fac<strong>to</strong>r δE/T larger than the corresponding figure Gpeak = G∞/2<br />
for the temperature range (25), and may even approach the unitary limit<br />
(∼e 2 /h) at the lower end of the temperature interval (32). Interestingly, breaking<br />
of time-reversal symmetry results in an increase of the average conductance<br />
[20]. This increase is analogous <strong>to</strong> negative magne<strong>to</strong>resistance due <strong>to</strong><br />
weak localization in bulk systems [37], with the same physics involv<strong>ed</strong>.<br />
4 Activationless Transport<br />
through a Blockad<strong>ed</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> Dot<br />
According <strong>to</strong> the rate equations theory [32], at low temperatures, T ≪ EC,<br />
conduction through the dot is exponentially suppress<strong>ed</strong> in the Coulomb<br />
blockade valleys. This suppression occurs because the process of electron transport<br />
through the dot involves a real transition <strong>to</strong> the state in which the charge<br />
of the dot differs by e from the thermodynamically most probable value. The<br />
probability of such fluctuation is proportional <strong>to</strong> exp (−EC|N 0 − N ∗ 0 |/T ),<br />
which explains the conductance suppression, see (30). Going beyond the<br />
lowest-order perturbation theory in conductances of the dot-leads junctions<br />
Gα allows one <strong>to</strong> consider processes in which states of the dot with a “wrong”<br />
charge participate in the tunneling process as virtual states. The existence of<br />
these higher-order contributions <strong>to</strong> the tunneling conductance was envision<strong>ed</strong><br />
already in 1968 by Giaever and Zeller [38]. The first quantitative theory of<br />
this effect, however, was develop<strong>ed</strong> much later [39].<br />
The leading contributions <strong>to</strong> the activationless transport, according <strong>to</strong> [39],<br />
are provid<strong>ed</strong> by the processes of inelastic and elastic co-tunneling. Unlike the<br />
sequential tunneling, in the co-tunneling mechanism, the events of electron<br />
tunneling from one of the leads in<strong>to</strong> the dot, and tunneling from the dot <strong>to</strong><br />
the other lead occur as a single quantum process.<br />
4.1 Inelastic Co-Tunneling<br />
In the inelastic co-tunneling mechanism, an electron tunnels from a lead in<strong>to</strong><br />
one of the vacant single-particle levels in the dot, while it is an electron occupying<br />
some other level that tunnels out of the dot, see Fig. 3(a). As a result,<br />
transfer of charge e between the leads is accompani<strong>ed</strong> by a simultaneous creation<br />
of an electron-hole pair in the dot.