Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Spin-down counts<br />
200<br />
100<br />
a<br />
Semiconduc<strong>to</strong>r Few-Electron <strong>Quantum</strong> Dots as Spin Qubits 81<br />
1-β<br />
α<br />
β<br />
1-α<br />
0<br />
0.0 0.2 0.4<br />
Detection time (ms)<br />
d<br />
u<br />
Probability<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
b<br />
α<br />
1-β<br />
1-β 2<br />
0.6 0.8 1.0<br />
Threshold (nA)<br />
Fig. 34. Measurement fidelity. (a) His<strong>to</strong>gram showing the distribution of detection<br />
times, tdetect, in the read-out stage (see Fig. 31b for definition tdetect). The exponential<br />
decay is due <strong>to</strong> spin-↓ electrons tunnelling out of the dot (rate = Γ↓) and<br />
due <strong>to</strong> spin flips during the read-out stage (rate = 1/T1). Solid line: exponential fit<br />
with a decay time (Γ↓ +1/T1) −1 of 0.09 ms. Given that T1 = 0.55 ms, this yields<br />
Γ −1<br />
↓<br />
≈ 0.11 ms. Inset: fidelity parameters. A spin-↓ electron is declar<strong>ed</strong> “down” (d)<br />
or “up” (u) with probability 1 − β or β, respectively. A spin-↑ electron is declar<strong>ed</strong><br />
“up” or “down” with probability 1−α or α, respectively. (b) Open squares represent<br />
α, obtain<strong>ed</strong> from the saturation value of exponential fits as in Fig. 31c for different<br />
values of the read-out threshold. A current of 0.54 nA (0.91 nA) corresponds <strong>to</strong><br />
the average value of ∆IQP C when the dot is occupi<strong>ed</strong> (empty) during tread. Open<br />
diamonds: measur<strong>ed</strong> fraction of “reverse-pulse” traces in which ∆IQP C crosses the<br />
injection threshold (dott<strong>ed</strong> black line in Fig. 31d). This fraction approximates 1−β2,<br />
where β2 is the probability of identifying a spin-↓ electron as “spin-up” due <strong>to</strong> the<br />
finite bandwidth of the measurement setup. Fill<strong>ed</strong> circles: <strong>to</strong>tal fidelity for the spin-<br />
↓ state, 1 − β, calculat<strong>ed</strong> using β1 =0.17. The vertical dott<strong>ed</strong> line indicates the<br />
threshold for which the visibility 1 − α − β (separation between fill<strong>ed</strong> circles and<br />
open squares) is maximal. This threshold value of 0.73 nA is us<strong>ed</strong> in the analysis of<br />
Fig. 31<br />
probability that a step is miss<strong>ed</strong>, β2, depends on the value of the threshold.<br />
It can be determin<strong>ed</strong> by applying a modifi<strong>ed</strong> (“revers<strong>ed</strong>”) pulse (Fig. 31d).<br />
For such a pulse, we know that in each trace an electron is inject<strong>ed</strong> in the<br />
dot, so there should always be a step at the start of the pulse. The fraction<br />
of traces in which this step is nevertheless miss<strong>ed</strong>, i.e. ∆IQP C stays below<br />
the threshold (dott<strong>ed</strong> black line in Fig. 31d), gives β2. We plot 1 − β2 in<br />
Fig. 34b (open diamonds). The resulting <strong>to</strong>tal fidelity for spin-↓ is given by<br />
1 − β ≈ (1 − β1)(1 − β2)+(αβ1). The last term accounts for the case when a<br />
spin-↓ electron is flipp<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> spin-↑, but there is nevertheless a step in ∆IQP C<br />
due <strong>to</strong> the dark-count mechanism 6 . In Fig. 34b we also plot the extract<strong>ed</strong><br />
value of 1 − β as a function of the threshold.<br />
6 Let us assume there is a spin-↓ electron on the dot at the start of the read-out<br />
stage. The probability that the ↓-electron tunnels out (i.e. that it does not relax<strong>to</strong>