29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

�<br />

Andreev Billiards 159<br />

pdq =2π�(m + ν/4), m =0, 1, 2,... (77)<br />

enclos<strong>ed</strong> by each of the two <strong>to</strong>pologically independent con<strong>to</strong>urs on the <strong>to</strong><strong>ru</strong>s.<br />

Equation (77) ensures that the wave functions are single valu<strong>ed</strong>. The integer<br />

ν counts the number of caustics (Maslov index) and in this case should also<br />

include the number of Andreev reflections.<br />

The first con<strong>to</strong>ur follows the quasiperiodic orbit of (75), leading <strong>to</strong><br />

ET =(m + 1<br />

2 )π�, m =0, 1, 2,... (78)<br />

The quantization condition (78) is sufficient <strong>to</strong> determine the smooth<strong>ed</strong> (or<br />

ensemble averag<strong>ed</strong>) density of states<br />

� ∞<br />

∞�<br />

〈ρ(E)〉 = N dT P (T )<br />

0<br />

m=0<br />

δ � E − (m + 1<br />

2 )π�/T � , (79)<br />

using the classical probability distribution P (T ) for the time between Andreev<br />

reflections. (The distribution P (T ) is defin<strong>ed</strong> with a uniform measure in the<br />

surface of section (x, px) at the interface with the superconduc<strong>to</strong>r.)<br />

Equation (79) is the “Bohr-Sommerfeld <strong>ru</strong>le” of Melsen et al. [22]. It generalizes<br />

the familiar Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization <strong>ru</strong>le for translationally<br />

invariant geometries [cf. (7)] <strong>to</strong> arbitrary geometries. The quantization <strong>ru</strong>le<br />

refers <strong>to</strong> classical periodic motion with period 2T and phase increment per<br />

period of 2ET/� − π, consisting of a part 2ET/� because of the energy difference<br />

2E between electron and hole, plus a phase shift of −π from two<br />

Andreev reflections. If E is not ≪ ∆, this latter phase shift should be replac<strong>ed</strong><br />

by −2 arccos(E/∆) [64, 65, 66], cf. (20). In the presence of a magnetic<br />

field an extra phase increment proportional <strong>to</strong> the enclos<strong>ed</strong> flux should be includ<strong>ed</strong><br />

[67]. Equation (79) can also be deriv<strong>ed</strong> from the Eilenberger equation<br />

for the quasiclassical Green function [23].<br />

To find the location of individual energy levels a second quantization condition<br />

is ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong> [61]. It is provid<strong>ed</strong> by the area �<br />

T pxdx enclos<strong>ed</strong> by the isochronous<br />

con<strong>to</strong>urs,<br />

�<br />

pxdx =2π�(n + ν/4), n =0, 1, 2,... (80)<br />

T<br />

Equation (80) amounts <strong>to</strong> a quantization of the period T , which <strong>to</strong>gether with<br />

(78) leads <strong>to</strong> a quantization of E. ForeachTn there is a ladder of Andreev<br />

levels Enm =(m + 1<br />

2 )π�/Tn.<br />

While the classical T can become arbitrarily large, the quantiz<strong>ed</strong> Tn has a<br />

cu<strong>to</strong>ff. The cu<strong>to</strong>ff follows from the maximal area (76) enclos<strong>ed</strong> by an isochronous<br />

con<strong>to</strong>ur. Since (80) requires Amax > ∼ h, the longest quantiz<strong>ed</strong> period is<br />

T0 = α −1 [ln N + O(1)]. The lowest Andreev level associat<strong>ed</strong> with an adiabatically<br />

invariant <strong>to</strong><strong>ru</strong>s is therefore

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!