Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
�<br />
Andreev Billiards 159<br />
pdq =2π�(m + ν/4), m =0, 1, 2,... (77)<br />
enclos<strong>ed</strong> by each of the two <strong>to</strong>pologically independent con<strong>to</strong>urs on the <strong>to</strong><strong>ru</strong>s.<br />
Equation (77) ensures that the wave functions are single valu<strong>ed</strong>. The integer<br />
ν counts the number of caustics (Maslov index) and in this case should also<br />
include the number of Andreev reflections.<br />
The first con<strong>to</strong>ur follows the quasiperiodic orbit of (75), leading <strong>to</strong><br />
ET =(m + 1<br />
2 )π�, m =0, 1, 2,... (78)<br />
The quantization condition (78) is sufficient <strong>to</strong> determine the smooth<strong>ed</strong> (or<br />
ensemble averag<strong>ed</strong>) density of states<br />
� ∞<br />
∞�<br />
〈ρ(E)〉 = N dT P (T )<br />
0<br />
m=0<br />
δ � E − (m + 1<br />
2 )π�/T � , (79)<br />
using the classical probability distribution P (T ) for the time between Andreev<br />
reflections. (The distribution P (T ) is defin<strong>ed</strong> with a uniform measure in the<br />
surface of section (x, px) at the interface with the superconduc<strong>to</strong>r.)<br />
Equation (79) is the “Bohr-Sommerfeld <strong>ru</strong>le” of Melsen et al. [22]. It generalizes<br />
the familiar Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization <strong>ru</strong>le for translationally<br />
invariant geometries [cf. (7)] <strong>to</strong> arbitrary geometries. The quantization <strong>ru</strong>le<br />
refers <strong>to</strong> classical periodic motion with period 2T and phase increment per<br />
period of 2ET/� − π, consisting of a part 2ET/� because of the energy difference<br />
2E between electron and hole, plus a phase shift of −π from two<br />
Andreev reflections. If E is not ≪ ∆, this latter phase shift should be replac<strong>ed</strong><br />
by −2 arccos(E/∆) [64, 65, 66], cf. (20). In the presence of a magnetic<br />
field an extra phase increment proportional <strong>to</strong> the enclos<strong>ed</strong> flux should be includ<strong>ed</strong><br />
[67]. Equation (79) can also be deriv<strong>ed</strong> from the Eilenberger equation<br />
for the quasiclassical Green function [23].<br />
To find the location of individual energy levels a second quantization condition<br />
is ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong> [61]. It is provid<strong>ed</strong> by the area �<br />
T pxdx enclos<strong>ed</strong> by the isochronous<br />
con<strong>to</strong>urs,<br />
�<br />
pxdx =2π�(n + ν/4), n =0, 1, 2,... (80)<br />
T<br />
Equation (80) amounts <strong>to</strong> a quantization of the period T , which <strong>to</strong>gether with<br />
(78) leads <strong>to</strong> a quantization of E. ForeachTn there is a ladder of Andreev<br />
levels Enm =(m + 1<br />
2 )π�/Tn.<br />
While the classical T can become arbitrarily large, the quantiz<strong>ed</strong> Tn has a<br />
cu<strong>to</strong>ff. The cu<strong>to</strong>ff follows from the maximal area (76) enclos<strong>ed</strong> by an isochronous<br />
con<strong>to</strong>ur. Since (80) requires Amax > ∼ h, the longest quantiz<strong>ed</strong> period is<br />
T0 = α −1 [ln N + O(1)]. The lowest Andreev level associat<strong>ed</strong> with an adiabatically<br />
invariant <strong>to</strong><strong>ru</strong>s is therefore