29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144 C.W.J. Beenakker<br />

The effective Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian Heff should not be confus<strong>ed</strong> with the Bogoliubov-de<br />

Gennes Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian HBG, which contains the superconducting order parameter<br />

in the off-diagonal blocks [cf. (2)]. The Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian HBG determines the<br />

entire excitation spect<strong>ru</strong>m (both the discrete part below ∆ and the continuous<br />

part above ∆), while the effective Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian Heff determines only the<br />

low-lying excitations Ep ≪ ∆.<br />

The Hermitian matrix Heff (like HBG) is antisymmetric under the com-<br />

bin<strong>ed</strong> operation of charge conjugation (C) and time inversion (T )[39]:<br />

Heff = −σyH T �<br />

0<br />

effσy, σy =<br />

i<br />

�<br />

−i<br />

.<br />

0<br />

(37)<br />

(An M × M unit matrix in each of the four blocks of σy is implicit.) The CT -<br />

antisymmetry ensures that the eigenvalues lie symmetrically around E =0.<br />

Only the positive eigenvalues are retain<strong>ed</strong> in the excitation spect<strong>ru</strong>m, but the<br />

presence of the negative eigenvalues is felt as a level repulsion near E =0.<br />

6.2 Excitation Gap<br />

In zero magnetic field the suppression of the density of states ρ(E) around<br />

E = 0 extends over an energy range ET that may contain many level spacings<br />

δ of the isolat<strong>ed</strong> billiard. The ratio g � ET /δ is the conductance of the point<br />

contact in units of the conductance quantum e2 /h. Forg≫ 1 the excitation<br />

gap Egap � gδ is a mesoscopic quantity, because it is interm<strong>ed</strong>iate between<br />

the microscopic energy scale δ and the macroscopic energy scale ∆. One can<br />

use perturbation theory in the small parameter 1/g <strong>to</strong> calculate ρ(E). The<br />

analysis present<strong>ed</strong> here follows the RMT of Melsen et al. [22]. An alternative<br />

derivation [40], using the disorder-averag<strong>ed</strong> Green function, is discuss<strong>ed</strong> in the<br />

next sub-section.<br />

In the presence of time-reversal symmetry the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian H of the isolat<strong>ed</strong><br />

billiard is a real symmetric matrix. The appropriate RMT ensemble is<br />

the GOE, with distribution [9]<br />

�<br />

P (H) ∝ exp − π2<br />

�<br />

Tr H2 . (38)<br />

4Mδ2 The ensemble average 〈···〉is an average over H in the GOE at fix<strong>ed</strong> coupling<br />

matrix W . Because of the block st<strong>ru</strong>cture of Heff, the ensemble averag<strong>ed</strong> Green<br />

function G(E) =〈(E −Heff) −1 〉 consists of four M × M blocks G11, G12, G21,<br />

G22. By taking the trace of each block separately, one arrives at a 2×2 matrix<br />

Green function<br />

G =<br />

� G11 G12<br />

G21 G22<br />

�<br />

= δ<br />

π<br />

� Tr G11 Tr G12<br />

Tr G21 Tr G22<br />

(The fac<strong>to</strong>r δ/π is insert<strong>ed</strong> for later convenience.)<br />

�<br />

. (39)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!