Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
144 C.W.J. Beenakker<br />
The effective Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian Heff should not be confus<strong>ed</strong> with the Bogoliubov-de<br />
Gennes Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian HBG, which contains the superconducting order parameter<br />
in the off-diagonal blocks [cf. (2)]. The Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian HBG determines the<br />
entire excitation spect<strong>ru</strong>m (both the discrete part below ∆ and the continuous<br />
part above ∆), while the effective Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian Heff determines only the<br />
low-lying excitations Ep ≪ ∆.<br />
The Hermitian matrix Heff (like HBG) is antisymmetric under the com-<br />
bin<strong>ed</strong> operation of charge conjugation (C) and time inversion (T )[39]:<br />
Heff = −σyH T �<br />
0<br />
effσy, σy =<br />
i<br />
�<br />
−i<br />
.<br />
0<br />
(37)<br />
(An M × M unit matrix in each of the four blocks of σy is implicit.) The CT -<br />
antisymmetry ensures that the eigenvalues lie symmetrically around E =0.<br />
Only the positive eigenvalues are retain<strong>ed</strong> in the excitation spect<strong>ru</strong>m, but the<br />
presence of the negative eigenvalues is felt as a level repulsion near E =0.<br />
6.2 Excitation Gap<br />
In zero magnetic field the suppression of the density of states ρ(E) around<br />
E = 0 extends over an energy range ET that may contain many level spacings<br />
δ of the isolat<strong>ed</strong> billiard. The ratio g � ET /δ is the conductance of the point<br />
contact in units of the conductance quantum e2 /h. Forg≫ 1 the excitation<br />
gap Egap � gδ is a mesoscopic quantity, because it is interm<strong>ed</strong>iate between<br />
the microscopic energy scale δ and the macroscopic energy scale ∆. One can<br />
use perturbation theory in the small parameter 1/g <strong>to</strong> calculate ρ(E). The<br />
analysis present<strong>ed</strong> here follows the RMT of Melsen et al. [22]. An alternative<br />
derivation [40], using the disorder-averag<strong>ed</strong> Green function, is discuss<strong>ed</strong> in the<br />
next sub-section.<br />
In the presence of time-reversal symmetry the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian H of the isolat<strong>ed</strong><br />
billiard is a real symmetric matrix. The appropriate RMT ensemble is<br />
the GOE, with distribution [9]<br />
�<br />
P (H) ∝ exp − π2<br />
�<br />
Tr H2 . (38)<br />
4Mδ2 The ensemble average 〈···〉is an average over H in the GOE at fix<strong>ed</strong> coupling<br />
matrix W . Because of the block st<strong>ru</strong>cture of Heff, the ensemble averag<strong>ed</strong> Green<br />
function G(E) =〈(E −Heff) −1 〉 consists of four M × M blocks G11, G12, G21,<br />
G22. By taking the trace of each block separately, one arrives at a 2×2 matrix<br />
Green function<br />
G =<br />
� G11 G12<br />
G21 G22<br />
�<br />
= δ<br />
π<br />
� Tr G11 Tr G12<br />
Tr G21 Tr G22<br />
(The fac<strong>to</strong>r δ/π is insert<strong>ed</strong> for later convenience.)<br />
�<br />
. (39)