29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

�<br />

p<br />

�<br />

dθp<br />

= g<br />

2π<br />

RG for Interacting Fermions 19<br />

we obtain a convolution of the two Fermi liquid functions<br />

�<br />

u(θk − θp)u(θp − θk ′)=g<br />

�<br />

∞�<br />

u 2 m cos m(θ − θ ′ �<br />

)<br />

p<br />

u 2 0 + 1<br />

2<br />

m=1<br />

(38)<br />

(39)<br />

where we have revert<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> the notation θ = θk,θ ′ = θk ′. In the second term of<br />

(37), the δp,−p ′ turns out <strong>to</strong> be subleading, while the other allows independent<br />

sums over p, p ′ . This means that only u0 contributes <strong>to</strong> this term, (other<br />

avrerage <strong>to</strong> zero upon summing over all angles) which produces<br />

− �<br />

(40)<br />

pp ′<br />

u(θk − θp)u(θp ′ − θk ′)=g2 u 2 0<br />

Fe<strong>ed</strong>ing this in<strong>to</strong> full expression for this contribution <strong>to</strong> the particle-hole<br />

diagram, we find it <strong>to</strong> be<br />

dVαβγδ<br />

dt Leading<br />

g′ �<br />

= ∆ ln 2<br />

g<br />

kk ′<br />

�<br />

∞�<br />

u<br />

m=1<br />

2 m cos m(θ − θ ′ �<br />

)<br />

φ ∗ α(k)φ ∗ β(k ′ )φγ(k ′ )φδ(k) (41)<br />

Notice that the result is still of the Fermi liquid form. In other words the couplings<br />

Vαβγδ which were written in terms of Landau parameters um, flow in<strong>to</strong><br />

renormaliz<strong>ed</strong> coupling once again expressible in terms of renormaliz<strong>ed</strong> Landau<br />

parameters. By comparing the two sides, we see each um flows independently<br />

of the others as per<br />

dum<br />

dt = −e−t (ln 2)u 2 m m �= 0 (42)<br />

The above equation can be written in a more physically transparent form<br />

by using a rescal<strong>ed</strong> variable (for m �= 0 only)<br />

ũm = e −t um<br />

in terms of which the flow equation becomes<br />

(43)<br />

dũm<br />

dt = −ũm − (ln 2)ũ 2 m ≡ β(ũm) (44)<br />

where the last is a definition of the β-function.<br />

The reason uo does not flow is that the corresponding interaction commutes<br />

with the one-body “kinetic” part, and therefore does not suffer quantum<br />

fluctuations.<br />

This is the answer at large g. We have dropp<strong>ed</strong> subleading contributions<br />

of the following type:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!