Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
�<br />
p<br />
�<br />
dθp<br />
= g<br />
2π<br />
RG for Interacting Fermions 19<br />
we obtain a convolution of the two Fermi liquid functions<br />
�<br />
u(θk − θp)u(θp − θk ′)=g<br />
�<br />
∞�<br />
u 2 m cos m(θ − θ ′ �<br />
)<br />
p<br />
u 2 0 + 1<br />
2<br />
m=1<br />
(38)<br />
(39)<br />
where we have revert<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> the notation θ = θk,θ ′ = θk ′. In the second term of<br />
(37), the δp,−p ′ turns out <strong>to</strong> be subleading, while the other allows independent<br />
sums over p, p ′ . This means that only u0 contributes <strong>to</strong> this term, (other<br />
avrerage <strong>to</strong> zero upon summing over all angles) which produces<br />
− �<br />
(40)<br />
pp ′<br />
u(θk − θp)u(θp ′ − θk ′)=g2 u 2 0<br />
Fe<strong>ed</strong>ing this in<strong>to</strong> full expression for this contribution <strong>to</strong> the particle-hole<br />
diagram, we find it <strong>to</strong> be<br />
dVαβγδ<br />
dt Leading<br />
g′ �<br />
= ∆ ln 2<br />
g<br />
kk ′<br />
�<br />
∞�<br />
u<br />
m=1<br />
2 m cos m(θ − θ ′ �<br />
)<br />
φ ∗ α(k)φ ∗ β(k ′ )φγ(k ′ )φδ(k) (41)<br />
Notice that the result is still of the Fermi liquid form. In other words the couplings<br />
Vαβγδ which were written in terms of Landau parameters um, flow in<strong>to</strong><br />
renormaliz<strong>ed</strong> coupling once again expressible in terms of renormaliz<strong>ed</strong> Landau<br />
parameters. By comparing the two sides, we see each um flows independently<br />
of the others as per<br />
dum<br />
dt = −e−t (ln 2)u 2 m m �= 0 (42)<br />
The above equation can be written in a more physically transparent form<br />
by using a rescal<strong>ed</strong> variable (for m �= 0 only)<br />
ũm = e −t um<br />
in terms of which the flow equation becomes<br />
(43)<br />
dũm<br />
dt = −ũm − (ln 2)ũ 2 m ≡ β(ũm) (44)<br />
where the last is a definition of the β-function.<br />
The reason uo does not flow is that the corresponding interaction commutes<br />
with the one-body “kinetic” part, and therefore does not suffer quantum<br />
fluctuations.<br />
This is the answer at large g. We have dropp<strong>ed</strong> subleading contributions<br />
of the following type: