29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Andreev Billiards 147<br />

〈ρ(E)〉 = 2E<br />

δ (E2 − E 2 T ) −1/2 ,E>Egap = ET . (51)<br />

In this limit the density of states of the Andreev billiard has the same form<br />

as in the BCS theory for a bulk superconduc<strong>to</strong>r [44], with a r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> value of<br />

the gap (“minigap”). The inverse square-root singularity at the gap is cut off<br />

for any finite Γ , cf. Fig. 6.<br />

6.3 Effect of Impurity Scattering<br />

Impurity scattering in a chaotic Andreev billiard r<strong>ed</strong>uces the magnitude of the<br />

excitation gap by increasing the mean time τdwell between Andreev reflections.<br />

This effect was calculat<strong>ed</strong> by Vavilov and Larkin [40] using the method of<br />

impurity-averag<strong>ed</strong> Green functions [21]. The minigap in a disorder<strong>ed</strong> quantum<br />

dot is qualitatively similar <strong>to</strong> that in a disorder<strong>ed</strong> NS junction, cf. Sect. 3.<br />

The main parameter is the ratio of the mean free path l and the width of the<br />

contact W . (We assume that there is no barrier in the point contact, otherwise<br />

the tunnel probability Γ would enter as well.)<br />

For l ≫ W the mean dwell time saturates at the ballistic value<br />

τdwell = 2π�<br />

Nδ<br />

= πA<br />

vF W<br />

, if l ≫ W. (52)<br />

In the opposite limite l ≪ W the mean dwell time is determin<strong>ed</strong> by the twodimensional<br />

diffusion equation. Up <strong>to</strong> a geometry-dependent coefficient c of<br />

order unity, one has<br />

τdwell = c A<br />

vF l ln(A/W 2 ) , if l ≪ W. (53)<br />

The density of states in the two limits is shown in Fig. 7. There is little<br />

difference, once the energy is scal<strong>ed</strong> by τdwell. Forl ≫ W the excitation gap<br />

is given by the RMT result Egap =0.300 �/τdwell, cf.(49). For l ≪ W Vavilov<br />

and Larkin find Egap =0.331 �/τdwell.<br />

6.4 Magnetic Field Dependence<br />

A magnetic field B, perpendicular <strong>to</strong> the billiard, breaks time-reversal symmetry,<br />

thereby suppressing the excitation gap. A perturbative treatment remains<br />

possible as long as Egap(B) remains large compar<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> δ [45].<br />

The appropriate RMT ensemble for the isolat<strong>ed</strong> billiard is describ<strong>ed</strong> by<br />

the Pandey-Mehta distribution [9, 46]<br />

�<br />

P (H) ∝ exp<br />

×<br />

M�<br />

i,j=1<br />

− π2 (1 + b 2 )<br />

4Mδ 2<br />

� (Re Hij) 2 + b −2 (Im Hij) 2� �<br />

. (54)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!