Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
82 J.M. Elzerman et al.<br />
We now choose the optimal value of the threshold as the one for which<br />
the visibility 1 − α − β is maximal (dott<strong>ed</strong> vertical line in Fig. 34b). For this<br />
setting, α ≈ 0.07, β1 ≈ 0.17, β2 ≈ 0.15, so the measurement fidelity for the<br />
spin-↑ and the spin-↓ state is ∼0.93 and ∼0.72 respectively. The measurement<br />
visibility in a single-shot measurement is thus at present 65%.<br />
Significant improvements in the spin measurement visibility can be made<br />
by lowering the electron temperature (smaller α) and especially by making the<br />
charge measurement faster (smaller β). Already, the demonstration of singleshot<br />
spin read-out and the observation of T1 of order 1 ms are encouraging<br />
results for the use of electron spins as quantum bits.<br />
6 Semiconduc<strong>to</strong>r Few-Electron <strong>Quantum</strong> Dots<br />
as Spin Qubits<br />
In the previous sections we have describ<strong>ed</strong> experiments aim<strong>ed</strong> at creating<br />
a quantum dot spin qubit according <strong>to</strong> the proposal by Loss and DiVincenzo<br />
[2] (see also paragraph 1.3). The key ingr<strong>ed</strong>ients for these experiments –<br />
perform<strong>ed</strong> over the last two years – are a fully tunable few-electron double<br />
quantum dot and a quantum point contact (QPC) charge detec<strong>to</strong>r. We have<br />
operat<strong>ed</strong> the QPC in three different ways:<br />
1. By measuring its DC conductance, changes in the average charge on the<br />
double dot are reveal<strong>ed</strong>, which can be us<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> identify the charge configuration<br />
of the system.<br />
2. By measuring the conductance in real-time (with a bandwidth of ∼100 kHz),<br />
we can detect individual electrons tunnelling on or off the dot (in less than<br />
10 µs).<br />
3. By measuring the QPC response <strong>to</strong> a gate voltage pulse train (with the<br />
proper frequency) using a lock-in amplifier, we can determine the tunnel<br />
rate between the dot and a reservoir. In addition, by using a large pulse amplitude<br />
and measuring changes in the effective tunnel rate, we can identify<br />
excit<strong>ed</strong> states of the dot.<br />
Using these techniques, we have demonstrat<strong>ed</strong> that our GaAs/AlGaAs quantum<br />
dot circuit is a promising candidate for a spin qubit. However, we do<br />
not have a fully functional qubit yet, as coherent manipulation of a singleor<br />
a two-spin system has so far remain<strong>ed</strong> elusive. In this section, we evaluate<br />
the experimental status of the spin qubit project in terms of the DiVincenzo<br />
spin-↑) isgivenby1− β1. The probability that this tunnel event is detect<strong>ed</strong> (i.e.<br />
is not <strong>to</strong>o fast) is given by 1−β2. Therefore, the probability that a spin-↓ electron<br />
tunnels out and is detect<strong>ed</strong>, is (1−β1)(1−β2). In addition, there is the possibility<br />
that the ↓-electron relaxes, with probability β1, but a step in the QPC signal is<br />
nevertheless detect<strong>ed</strong>, with probability α, due <strong>to</strong> the “dark count” mechanism.<br />
Therefore, the <strong>to</strong>tal probability that a spin-↓ electron is declar<strong>ed</strong> “spin-down” is<br />
given by (1 − β1)(1 − β2)+(αβ1) approximately.