29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 J.M. Elzerman et al.<br />

We now choose the optimal value of the threshold as the one for which<br />

the visibility 1 − α − β is maximal (dott<strong>ed</strong> vertical line in Fig. 34b). For this<br />

setting, α ≈ 0.07, β1 ≈ 0.17, β2 ≈ 0.15, so the measurement fidelity for the<br />

spin-↑ and the spin-↓ state is ∼0.93 and ∼0.72 respectively. The measurement<br />

visibility in a single-shot measurement is thus at present 65%.<br />

Significant improvements in the spin measurement visibility can be made<br />

by lowering the electron temperature (smaller α) and especially by making the<br />

charge measurement faster (smaller β). Already, the demonstration of singleshot<br />

spin read-out and the observation of T1 of order 1 ms are encouraging<br />

results for the use of electron spins as quantum bits.<br />

6 Semiconduc<strong>to</strong>r Few-Electron <strong>Quantum</strong> Dots<br />

as Spin Qubits<br />

In the previous sections we have describ<strong>ed</strong> experiments aim<strong>ed</strong> at creating<br />

a quantum dot spin qubit according <strong>to</strong> the proposal by Loss and DiVincenzo<br />

[2] (see also paragraph 1.3). The key ingr<strong>ed</strong>ients for these experiments –<br />

perform<strong>ed</strong> over the last two years – are a fully tunable few-electron double<br />

quantum dot and a quantum point contact (QPC) charge detec<strong>to</strong>r. We have<br />

operat<strong>ed</strong> the QPC in three different ways:<br />

1. By measuring its DC conductance, changes in the average charge on the<br />

double dot are reveal<strong>ed</strong>, which can be us<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> identify the charge configuration<br />

of the system.<br />

2. By measuring the conductance in real-time (with a bandwidth of ∼100 kHz),<br />

we can detect individual electrons tunnelling on or off the dot (in less than<br />

10 µs).<br />

3. By measuring the QPC response <strong>to</strong> a gate voltage pulse train (with the<br />

proper frequency) using a lock-in amplifier, we can determine the tunnel<br />

rate between the dot and a reservoir. In addition, by using a large pulse amplitude<br />

and measuring changes in the effective tunnel rate, we can identify<br />

excit<strong>ed</strong> states of the dot.<br />

Using these techniques, we have demonstrat<strong>ed</strong> that our GaAs/AlGaAs quantum<br />

dot circuit is a promising candidate for a spin qubit. However, we do<br />

not have a fully functional qubit yet, as coherent manipulation of a singleor<br />

a two-spin system has so far remain<strong>ed</strong> elusive. In this section, we evaluate<br />

the experimental status of the spin qubit project in terms of the DiVincenzo<br />

spin-↑) isgivenby1− β1. The probability that this tunnel event is detect<strong>ed</strong> (i.e.<br />

is not <strong>to</strong>o fast) is given by 1−β2. Therefore, the probability that a spin-↓ electron<br />

tunnels out and is detect<strong>ed</strong>, is (1−β1)(1−β2). In addition, there is the possibility<br />

that the ↓-electron relaxes, with probability β1, but a step in the QPC signal is<br />

nevertheless detect<strong>ed</strong>, with probability α, due <strong>to</strong> the “dark count” mechanism.<br />

Therefore, the <strong>to</strong>tal probability that a spin-↓ electron is declar<strong>ed</strong> “spin-down” is<br />

given by (1 − β1)(1 − β2)+(αβ1) approximately.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!