Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
52 J.M. Elzerman et al.<br />
2.3 <strong>Quantum</strong> Point Contact as Charge Detec<strong>to</strong>r<br />
As an alternative <strong>to</strong> measuring the current through the quantum dot, we<br />
can also measure the charge on the dot using one of the QPCs [44, 45]. To<br />
demonstrate this functionality, we first define only the left dot (by grounding<br />
gates R and PR), and use the left QPC as a charge detec<strong>to</strong>r. The QPC is<br />
form<strong>ed</strong> by applying negative voltages <strong>to</strong> Q − L and L. This creates a narrow<br />
constriction in the 2DEG, with a conductance, G, that is quantiz<strong>ed</strong> when<br />
sweeping the gate voltage VQ−L. The last plateau (at G =2e 2 /h) and the<br />
transition <strong>to</strong> complete pinch-off (i.e. G =0)areshowninFig.16b. We tune<br />
the QPC <strong>to</strong> the steepest point (G ≈ e 2 /h), where the QPC-conductance has<br />
a maximum sensitivity <strong>to</strong> changes in the electrostatic environment, including<br />
changes in the charge of the nearby quantum dot.<br />
To change the number of electrons in the left dot, we make gate voltage<br />
VM more negative (see Fig. 16c). This r<strong>ed</strong>uces the QPC current, due <strong>to</strong><br />
the capacitive coupling from gate M <strong>to</strong> the QPC constriction. In addition, the<br />
changing gate voltage periodically pushes an electron out of the dot. The associat<strong>ed</strong><br />
sudden change in charge lifts the electrostatic potential at the QPC<br />
constriction, resulting in a step-like feature in IQP C (see the expansion in<br />
Fig. 16c, where the linear background is subtract<strong>ed</strong>). This step indicates a<br />
change in the electron number. So, even without passing current through the<br />
dot, IQP C provides information about the charge on the dot.<br />
To enhance the charge sensitivity we apply a small modulation (0.3 mV<br />
at 17.7 Hz) <strong>to</strong> VM and use lock-in detection <strong>to</strong> measure dIQP C/dVM [45].<br />
The steps in IQP C now appear as dips in dIQP C/dVM . Figure 16d shows<br />
the resulting dips, as well as the corresponding Coulomb peaks measur<strong>ed</strong> in<br />
the current through the dot. The coincidence of the Coulomb peaks and dips<br />
demonstrates that the QPC inde<strong>ed</strong> functions as a charge detec<strong>to</strong>r. From the<br />
height of the step in Fig. 16c (∼50 pA, typically 1–2% of the <strong>to</strong>tal current)<br />
compar<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> the noise (∼5 pA for a measurement time of 100 ms), we estimate<br />
the sensitivity of the charge detec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> be about 0.1e, with e being the single<br />
electron charge. The unique advantage of QPC charge detection is that it<br />
provides a signal even when the tunnel barriers of the dot are so opaque that<br />
IDOT is <strong>to</strong>o small <strong>to</strong> be measur<strong>ed</strong> [44, 45]. This allows us <strong>to</strong> study quantum<br />
<strong>dots</strong> even when they are virtually isolat<strong>ed</strong> from the reservoirs.<br />
2.4 Double Dot Charge Stability Diagram<br />
The QPC can also detect changes in the charge configuration of the double dot.<br />
To demonstrate this, we use the QPC on the right <strong>to</strong> measure dIQP C/dVL<br />
versus VL and VPR (Fig. 17a), where VL controls (mainly) the number of<br />
electrons on the left dot, and VPR (mainly) that on the right. Dark lines in<br />
the figure signify a dip in dIQP C/dVL, corresponding <strong>to</strong> a change in the <strong>to</strong>tal<br />
number of electrons on the double dot. Together these lines form the so-call<strong>ed</strong><br />
“honeycomb diagram” [46, 47]. The almost-horizontal lines correspond <strong>to</strong> a