29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 J.M. Elzerman et al.<br />

2.3 <strong>Quantum</strong> Point Contact as Charge Detec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

As an alternative <strong>to</strong> measuring the current through the quantum dot, we<br />

can also measure the charge on the dot using one of the QPCs [44, 45]. To<br />

demonstrate this functionality, we first define only the left dot (by grounding<br />

gates R and PR), and use the left QPC as a charge detec<strong>to</strong>r. The QPC is<br />

form<strong>ed</strong> by applying negative voltages <strong>to</strong> Q − L and L. This creates a narrow<br />

constriction in the 2DEG, with a conductance, G, that is quantiz<strong>ed</strong> when<br />

sweeping the gate voltage VQ−L. The last plateau (at G =2e 2 /h) and the<br />

transition <strong>to</strong> complete pinch-off (i.e. G =0)areshowninFig.16b. We tune<br />

the QPC <strong>to</strong> the steepest point (G ≈ e 2 /h), where the QPC-conductance has<br />

a maximum sensitivity <strong>to</strong> changes in the electrostatic environment, including<br />

changes in the charge of the nearby quantum dot.<br />

To change the number of electrons in the left dot, we make gate voltage<br />

VM more negative (see Fig. 16c). This r<strong>ed</strong>uces the QPC current, due <strong>to</strong><br />

the capacitive coupling from gate M <strong>to</strong> the QPC constriction. In addition, the<br />

changing gate voltage periodically pushes an electron out of the dot. The associat<strong>ed</strong><br />

sudden change in charge lifts the electrostatic potential at the QPC<br />

constriction, resulting in a step-like feature in IQP C (see the expansion in<br />

Fig. 16c, where the linear background is subtract<strong>ed</strong>). This step indicates a<br />

change in the electron number. So, even without passing current through the<br />

dot, IQP C provides information about the charge on the dot.<br />

To enhance the charge sensitivity we apply a small modulation (0.3 mV<br />

at 17.7 Hz) <strong>to</strong> VM and use lock-in detection <strong>to</strong> measure dIQP C/dVM [45].<br />

The steps in IQP C now appear as dips in dIQP C/dVM . Figure 16d shows<br />

the resulting dips, as well as the corresponding Coulomb peaks measur<strong>ed</strong> in<br />

the current through the dot. The coincidence of the Coulomb peaks and dips<br />

demonstrates that the QPC inde<strong>ed</strong> functions as a charge detec<strong>to</strong>r. From the<br />

height of the step in Fig. 16c (∼50 pA, typically 1–2% of the <strong>to</strong>tal current)<br />

compar<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> the noise (∼5 pA for a measurement time of 100 ms), we estimate<br />

the sensitivity of the charge detec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> be about 0.1e, with e being the single<br />

electron charge. The unique advantage of QPC charge detection is that it<br />

provides a signal even when the tunnel barriers of the dot are so opaque that<br />

IDOT is <strong>to</strong>o small <strong>to</strong> be measur<strong>ed</strong> [44, 45]. This allows us <strong>to</strong> study quantum<br />

<strong>dots</strong> even when they are virtually isolat<strong>ed</strong> from the reservoirs.<br />

2.4 Double Dot Charge Stability Diagram<br />

The QPC can also detect changes in the charge configuration of the double dot.<br />

To demonstrate this, we use the QPC on the right <strong>to</strong> measure dIQP C/dVL<br />

versus VL and VPR (Fig. 17a), where VL controls (mainly) the number of<br />

electrons on the left dot, and VPR (mainly) that on the right. Dark lines in<br />

the figure signify a dip in dIQP C/dVL, corresponding <strong>to</strong> a change in the <strong>to</strong>tal<br />

number of electrons on the double dot. Together these lines form the so-call<strong>ed</strong><br />

“honeycomb diagram” [46, 47]. The almost-horizontal lines correspond <strong>to</strong> a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!