29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112 M. Pustilnik and L.I. Glazman<br />

for the average value of the elastic co-tunneling contribution <strong>to</strong> the conductance.<br />

This result is easily generaliz<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> gate voltages tun<strong>ed</strong> away from the<br />

middle of the Coulomb blockade valley. The corresponding expression reads<br />

Gel ∼ GLGR<br />

e 2 /h<br />

�<br />

δE<br />

EC<br />

1<br />

N0 − N ∗ 0<br />

+<br />

1<br />

N ∗ 0 − N0 +1<br />

�<br />

. (46)<br />

and is valid when N0 is not <strong>to</strong>o close <strong>to</strong> the degeneracy points N0 = N ∗ 0 and<br />

N0 = N ∗ 0 +1(N ∗ 0 is a half-integer number):<br />

min<br />

�<br />

|N0 − N ∗ 0 | , |N0 − N ∗ �<br />

0 − 1|<br />

≫ δE/EC<br />

Comparison of (45) with (40) shows that the elastic co-tunneling mechanism<br />

dominates the electron transport already at temperatures<br />

T � Tel = � ECδE , (47)<br />

which may exce<strong>ed</strong> significantly the level spacing. However, as we will see<br />

shortly below, mesoscopic fluctuations of Gel are strong [41], of the order of<br />

its average value. Thus, although Gel is always positive, see (46), the samplespecific<br />

value of Gel for a given gate voltage may vanish.<br />

The key <strong>to</strong> understanding the statistical properties of the elastic cotunneling<br />

contribution <strong>to</strong> the conductance is provid<strong>ed</strong> by the observation that<br />

there are many (∼EC/δE ≫ 1) terms making significant contribution <strong>to</strong> the<br />

amplitude (42). All these terms are random and statisticaly independent of<br />

each other. The central limit theorem then suggests that the distribution of<br />

Ael is Gaussian [20], and, therefore, is completely characteris<strong>ed</strong> by the first<br />

two statistical moments,<br />

A el = A ∗ el , A el A el = A∗ el A∗ el = δ β,1 A el A ∗ el (48)<br />

with A∗ elAel given by (43). This can be proven by explicit consideration of<br />

higher moments. For example,<br />

|A4 el | =2�AelA∗ el<br />

�<br />

�2 + δ |A4 el | . (49)<br />

�2 + � � A el A el<br />

The non-Gaussian correction here, δ |A 4 el |∼ |A2 el | (δE/EC), is by a fac<strong>to</strong>r of<br />

δE/EC ≪ 1 smaller than the main (Gaussian) contribution.<br />

It follows from (44), (48), and (49) that the fluctuation of the conductance<br />

δGel = Gel − Gel satisfies<br />

δG 2 el<br />

2 � �2<br />

= Gel . (50)<br />

β<br />

Note that breaking of time reversal symmetry r<strong>ed</strong>uces the fluctuations by a<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>r of 2, similar <strong>to</strong> conductance fluctuations in bulk systems, whereas the<br />

average conductance (46) is not affect<strong>ed</strong> by the magnetic field.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!