29.01.2013 Views

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 R. Shankar<br />

the outgoing ones are forc<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> be equal <strong>to</strong> them (not in their sum, but<br />

individually) up <strong>to</strong> a permutation, which is irrelevant for spinless fermions.<br />

Thus we have in the end just one function of two angles, and by rotational<br />

invariance, their difference:<br />

u(θ1,θ2,θ1,θ2) =F (θ1 − θ2) ≡ F (θ) . (16)<br />

About forty years ago Landau came <strong>to</strong> the very same conclusion [3] thata<br />

Fermi system at low energies would be describ<strong>ed</strong> by one function defin<strong>ed</strong> on<br />

the Fermi surface. He did this without the benefit of the RG and for that<br />

reason, some of the leaps were hard <strong>to</strong> understand. Later detail<strong>ed</strong> diagrammatic<br />

calculations justifi<strong>ed</strong> this picture [4]. The RG provides yet another way<br />

<strong>to</strong> understand it. It also tells us other things, as we will now see.<br />

The first thing is that the final angles are not slav<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> the initial ones if<br />

the former are exactly opposite, as in the right half of Fig. 2. In this case, the<br />

final ones can be anything, as long as they are opposite <strong>to</strong> each other. This<br />

leads <strong>to</strong> one more set of marginal couplings in the BCS channel, call<strong>ed</strong><br />

u(θ1, −θ1,θ3, −θ3) =V (θ3 − θ1) ≡ V (θ) . (17)<br />

The next point is that since F and V are marginal at tree level, we have<br />

<strong>to</strong> go <strong>to</strong> one loop <strong>to</strong> see if they are still so. So we draw the usual diagrams<br />

showninFig.3. We eliminate an infinitesimal momentum slice of thickness<br />

dΛ at k = ±Λ.<br />

δF δV<br />

1<br />

K ω 2<br />

+<br />

3 K+Q ω -3<br />

+<br />

1<br />

K ω<br />

(a)<br />

2 1 K ω<br />

(a)<br />

-1<br />

ZS<br />

2 K +Q ω 1<br />

+<br />

1<br />

K ω 2<br />

(b)<br />

ZS’<br />

1 2<br />

K ω<br />

− ω<br />

P-K<br />

1 2<br />

(c)<br />

BCS<br />

Q<br />

ZS<br />

-3 K +Q’ ω 3<br />

+<br />

1<br />

K ω -1<br />

(b)<br />

ZS’<br />

3 -3<br />

K ω<br />

− ω<br />

-K<br />

1 -1<br />

(c)<br />

BCS<br />

Fig. 3. One loop diagrams for the flow of F and V . The last at the bot<strong>to</strong>m shows<br />

that a large momentum Q can be absorb<strong>ed</strong> only at two particular initial angles (only<br />

one of which is shown) if the final state is <strong>to</strong> lie in the shell being eliminat<strong>ed</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!