Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
Heiss W.D. (ed.) Quantum dots.. a doorway to - tiera.ru
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8 R. Shankar<br />
the outgoing ones are forc<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> be equal <strong>to</strong> them (not in their sum, but<br />
individually) up <strong>to</strong> a permutation, which is irrelevant for spinless fermions.<br />
Thus we have in the end just one function of two angles, and by rotational<br />
invariance, their difference:<br />
u(θ1,θ2,θ1,θ2) =F (θ1 − θ2) ≡ F (θ) . (16)<br />
About forty years ago Landau came <strong>to</strong> the very same conclusion [3] thata<br />
Fermi system at low energies would be describ<strong>ed</strong> by one function defin<strong>ed</strong> on<br />
the Fermi surface. He did this without the benefit of the RG and for that<br />
reason, some of the leaps were hard <strong>to</strong> understand. Later detail<strong>ed</strong> diagrammatic<br />
calculations justifi<strong>ed</strong> this picture [4]. The RG provides yet another way<br />
<strong>to</strong> understand it. It also tells us other things, as we will now see.<br />
The first thing is that the final angles are not slav<strong>ed</strong> <strong>to</strong> the initial ones if<br />
the former are exactly opposite, as in the right half of Fig. 2. In this case, the<br />
final ones can be anything, as long as they are opposite <strong>to</strong> each other. This<br />
leads <strong>to</strong> one more set of marginal couplings in the BCS channel, call<strong>ed</strong><br />
u(θ1, −θ1,θ3, −θ3) =V (θ3 − θ1) ≡ V (θ) . (17)<br />
The next point is that since F and V are marginal at tree level, we have<br />
<strong>to</strong> go <strong>to</strong> one loop <strong>to</strong> see if they are still so. So we draw the usual diagrams<br />
showninFig.3. We eliminate an infinitesimal momentum slice of thickness<br />
dΛ at k = ±Λ.<br />
δF δV<br />
1<br />
K ω 2<br />
+<br />
3 K+Q ω -3<br />
+<br />
1<br />
K ω<br />
(a)<br />
2 1 K ω<br />
(a)<br />
-1<br />
ZS<br />
2 K +Q ω 1<br />
+<br />
1<br />
K ω 2<br />
(b)<br />
ZS’<br />
1 2<br />
K ω<br />
− ω<br />
P-K<br />
1 2<br />
(c)<br />
BCS<br />
Q<br />
ZS<br />
-3 K +Q’ ω 3<br />
+<br />
1<br />
K ω -1<br />
(b)<br />
ZS’<br />
3 -3<br />
K ω<br />
− ω<br />
-K<br />
1 -1<br />
(c)<br />
BCS<br />
Fig. 3. One loop diagrams for the flow of F and V . The last at the bot<strong>to</strong>m shows<br />
that a large momentum Q can be absorb<strong>ed</strong> only at two particular initial angles (only<br />
one of which is shown) if the final state is <strong>to</strong> lie in the shell being eliminat<strong>ed</strong>