30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

military conflict, it is getting uglier by the<br />

minute. As Peter Preston writes in today’s<br />

Guardian: “So, who’s winning the loathing campaign?<br />

The lower echelons of the empire Rupert<br />

built produced some wonderful haters. The Post<br />

hates The New York Times. It dissected a Times<br />

front page, story by story, and labeled the result<br />

‘News by Saddam.’ It hates the ‘vermin’ of Iraq,<br />

the ‘euro-weasels’ of Brussels, and the failed,<br />

‘irrelevant’ UN. It even quite despises Murdoch’s<br />

London Times for printing damp little pieces<br />

about British public opinion based on one interview<br />

with a ‘market gardener.’<br />

“Some of the vituperation, though, reaches<br />

pitches of bitterness, which can only betoken sincerity.<br />

See Matthew Parris in the Times diagnosing<br />

‘the Madness of King Tony’ in grim clinical<br />

detail. See Nick Cohen (of this parish) taking a<br />

New Statesman cleaver to Andrew Murray of the<br />

Stop the War Alliance: ‘A living fossil from the<br />

age of European dictators is heading the biggest<br />

protest of the new century.’ See our great<br />

farceur, Tom Sharpe, writing an incensed open<br />

letter to Tony Blair, which ends ‘yours in despair,<br />

and disillusionment.’ ”<br />

The word “Coalition:” how true?<br />

WRITING from Baghdad, The Independent’s<br />

Robert Fisk blasts the BBC for speaking of<br />

“coalition” troops: “Why do we aid and abet the<br />

lies and propaganda of this filthy war? How<br />

come, for example, it’s now BBC ‘style’ to<br />

describe the Anglo-American invaders as the<br />

‘coalition.’ This is a lie. The ‘coalition’ that we’re<br />

obviously supposed to remember is the one<br />

forged to drive Iraqi occupation troops from<br />

Kuwait in 1991, an alliance involving dozens of<br />

WAR KILLS JOURNALISTS<br />

179<br />

countries almost all of whom now condemn President<br />

George Bush Junior’s adventure in Iraq.<br />

There are a few Australian special forces swanning<br />

about in the desert, courtesy of the country’s<br />

eccentric prime minister, John Howard; but<br />

that’s it. So who at the BBC decreed this dishonest<br />

word ‘coalition?’ True, there’s a ‘coalition of<br />

the willing,” to use Bush’s weird phrase but this<br />

is a reference to those nations which have given<br />

over flying rights to the United States or have<br />

given political but not military support. So the<br />

phrase ‘coalition forces” remains a lie.” ●<br />

APRIL 8: COMICS MAKE<br />

FUN OF THE CONFLICT<br />

WHAT was billed as the war of liberation began<br />

with an attempted decapitation and remained<br />

focused on execution in all realms. This time,<br />

thanks to an intelligence intercept and a tip on<br />

the ground, a B-1 bomber was dispatched to finish<br />

the real job – the annihilation of Saddam and<br />

company, one of the most expensive assassinations<br />

in history – that is, if it was as successful as<br />

the gleeful TV anchors and their “high-level”<br />

sources were hoping. Three “bunker buster”<br />

bombs were used this time to leave an enormous<br />

crater in a residential Neighborhood. Reportedly<br />

it happened at 6 a.m. our time yesterday but the<br />

news was withheld for over twelve hours.<br />

Throughout it all, the demonization continues;<br />

“Butcher and evil sons may have died plotting<br />

escape,” reads one headline in today’s New York<br />

Post, a facsimile of a newspaper published in<br />

New York. As I tuned in for the latest this morning,<br />

before the briefers showed up to tell us what

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!