UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
- TAGS
- updated
- coldtype
- coldtype.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The CIA role: Out of sight,<br />
not out of hand<br />
IN my experience as a longtime CIA watcher,<br />
who personally spent years investigating covert<br />
activities of the kind dramatized in “The Quiet<br />
American,” the movie about Vietnam that was<br />
briefly released and pulled from theaters by<br />
Miramax even after Michael Caine was nominated<br />
for an Oscar, this operation smells of socalled<br />
“special ops,” a propaganda operation.<br />
Richard Sale of UPI reminded us yesterday<br />
that the CIA has had a long history in Iraq as<br />
well as an association with the man whose<br />
regime they are now helping to topple. “U.S.<br />
forces in Baghdad might now be searching high<br />
and low for Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, but in<br />
the past Saddam was seen by U.S. intelligence<br />
services as a bulwark of anti-communism and<br />
they used him as their instrument for more than<br />
40 years, according to former U.S. intelligence<br />
diplomats and intelligence officials.”<br />
United Press International has interviewed<br />
almost a dozen former U.S. diplomats, British<br />
scholars and former U.S. intelligence officials to<br />
piece together its investigation. The CIA<br />
declined to comment on the report.<br />
Where is Saddam? Was there a deal?<br />
IF the CIA has been dealing with Saddam over<br />
all these decades, why not now? While the media<br />
keeps focusing our attention on the “where is<br />
Saddam?” question, the Tehran Times is reporting<br />
rumors of a deal between the U.S. military<br />
and Hussein. Here’s the story by Parviz Esmaeili:<br />
“Almost 10 days ago, there was a halt in U.S.-<br />
British operations in Iraq. However, U.S. Defense<br />
SO, THIS IS VICTORY<br />
203<br />
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the chief of the<br />
U.S. Central Command, General Tommy Franks,<br />
in their interviews with the media never elaborated<br />
on the issue but instead tried to mislead<br />
world public opinion in order to hide a greater<br />
secret decision from them.<br />
“Suspicions rose on the same day when U.S.<br />
troops, that had been stopped at the Euphrates,<br />
immediately were able to advance toward the<br />
heart of Baghdad without any significant resistance<br />
by Iraqi forces . . . Or why when the elite<br />
Iraqi forces arrived in eastern Iraq from Tikrit,<br />
the pace of the invaders advancing toward central<br />
Baghdad immediately increased. Also, it has<br />
been reported that over the past 24 hours, a<br />
plane was authorized to leave Iraq bound for<br />
Russia. Who was aboard this plane?<br />
“All these ambiguities, the contradictory<br />
reports about Saddam’s situation, and the fact<br />
that the highest-ranking Iraqi officials were all<br />
represented by a single individual – Iraqi Information<br />
Minister Mohammed al-Sahhaf – and the<br />
easy fall of Baghdad shows that the center of collusion<br />
had been Tikrit, where Saddam, his aides,<br />
and lieutenants from the Baath Party had been<br />
waiting for al-Sahhaf to join them so that they<br />
could receive the required guarantees to leave<br />
the country in a secret compromise with coalition<br />
forces.”<br />
This possibility was confirmed by the Al-<br />
Jazeera network, which quoted a Russian intelligence<br />
official as saying that the Iraqi forces and<br />
the invaders had made a deal. The Russian official<br />
told Al-Jazeera that the Iraqi leaders had<br />
agreed “to show no serious resistance against<br />
the U.S.-British troops in return for a guarantee<br />
that Saddam and his close relatives could leave<br />
Iraq unharmed.”