30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The CIA role: Out of sight,<br />

not out of hand<br />

IN my experience as a longtime CIA watcher,<br />

who personally spent years investigating covert<br />

activities of the kind dramatized in “The Quiet<br />

American,” the movie about Vietnam that was<br />

briefly released and pulled from theaters by<br />

Miramax even after Michael Caine was nominated<br />

for an Oscar, this operation smells of socalled<br />

“special ops,” a propaganda operation.<br />

Richard Sale of UPI reminded us yesterday<br />

that the CIA has had a long history in Iraq as<br />

well as an association with the man whose<br />

regime they are now helping to topple. “U.S.<br />

forces in Baghdad might now be searching high<br />

and low for Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, but in<br />

the past Saddam was seen by U.S. intelligence<br />

services as a bulwark of anti-communism and<br />

they used him as their instrument for more than<br />

40 years, according to former U.S. intelligence<br />

diplomats and intelligence officials.”<br />

United Press International has interviewed<br />

almost a dozen former U.S. diplomats, British<br />

scholars and former U.S. intelligence officials to<br />

piece together its investigation. The CIA<br />

declined to comment on the report.<br />

Where is Saddam? Was there a deal?<br />

IF the CIA has been dealing with Saddam over<br />

all these decades, why not now? While the media<br />

keeps focusing our attention on the “where is<br />

Saddam?” question, the Tehran Times is reporting<br />

rumors of a deal between the U.S. military<br />

and Hussein. Here’s the story by Parviz Esmaeili:<br />

“Almost 10 days ago, there was a halt in U.S.-<br />

British operations in Iraq. However, U.S. Defense<br />

SO, THIS IS VICTORY<br />

203<br />

Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the chief of the<br />

U.S. Central Command, General Tommy Franks,<br />

in their interviews with the media never elaborated<br />

on the issue but instead tried to mislead<br />

world public opinion in order to hide a greater<br />

secret decision from them.<br />

“Suspicions rose on the same day when U.S.<br />

troops, that had been stopped at the Euphrates,<br />

immediately were able to advance toward the<br />

heart of Baghdad without any significant resistance<br />

by Iraqi forces . . . Or why when the elite<br />

Iraqi forces arrived in eastern Iraq from Tikrit,<br />

the pace of the invaders advancing toward central<br />

Baghdad immediately increased. Also, it has<br />

been reported that over the past 24 hours, a<br />

plane was authorized to leave Iraq bound for<br />

Russia. Who was aboard this plane?<br />

“All these ambiguities, the contradictory<br />

reports about Saddam’s situation, and the fact<br />

that the highest-ranking Iraqi officials were all<br />

represented by a single individual – Iraqi Information<br />

Minister Mohammed al-Sahhaf – and the<br />

easy fall of Baghdad shows that the center of collusion<br />

had been Tikrit, where Saddam, his aides,<br />

and lieutenants from the Baath Party had been<br />

waiting for al-Sahhaf to join them so that they<br />

could receive the required guarantees to leave<br />

the country in a secret compromise with coalition<br />

forces.”<br />

This possibility was confirmed by the Al-<br />

Jazeera network, which quoted a Russian intelligence<br />

official as saying that the Iraqi forces and<br />

the invaders had made a deal. The Russian official<br />

told Al-Jazeera that the Iraqi leaders had<br />

agreed “to show no serious resistance against<br />

the U.S.-British troops in return for a guarantee<br />

that Saddam and his close relatives could leave<br />

Iraq unharmed.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!