UPDATED - ColdType

EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION
Iraq’s tight restrictions on the ownership and
export of antiquities.” Translation: give us the
valuable antiquities to sell, all in the name of
preservation.
The sound of statues falling
YESTERDAY, I cast a skeptical eye at the big
story on all the TV News – the toppling of the big
Saddam statue. We all saw it, complete with
scenes of dancing mobs and young men with
hammers beating up on what had been Saddam’s
head. Many networks showed that dramatic
“hammering” over and over. They milked the
scene, which seemed to rationalize and justify
the invasion. American officials gushed about
the pictures. If there is one thing this war has
taught us all, it’s that we can’t believe what we’re
told. As an indy media site explained: “For Donald
Rumsfeld these were ‘breathtaking.’ For the
British Army they were ‘historic.’ For BBC Radio
they were ‘amazing.’
BUT – and there is always a big But. “A wide
angle shot in which you can see the whole of Fardus
Square (conveniently located just opposite
the Palestine Hotel where the international
media are based), and the presence of at most
around 200 people – most of them U.S. troops
(note the tanks and armored vehicles) and
assembled journalists.”
Run that by me again? Another IMC reader
adds: “Oddly enough . . . a photograph is taken of
a man who bears an uncanny resemblance to
one of Chalabi’s militia members . . . he is near
Fardus Square to greet the Marines. How many
members of the pro-American Free Iraqi Forces
were in and around Fardus Square as the statue
of Saddam came tumbling down?
202
Picture this
“THE up-close action video of the statue being
destroyed is broadcast around the world as proof
of a massive uprising. Still photos grabbed off of
Reuters show a long-shot view of Fardus Square
. . . it’s empty save for the U.S. Marines, the International
Press, and a small handful of Iraqis.
There are no more than 200 people in the square
at best. The Marines have the square sealed off
and guarded by tanks. A U.S. mechanized vehicle
is used to pull the statue of Saddam from its
base. The entire event is being hailed as an
equivalent of the Berlin Wall falling . . . but even
a quick glance of the long-shot photo shows
something more akin to a carefully constructed
media event tailored for the television cameras.”
Kim Sengupta reported another fascinating
detail yesterday from Baghdad: “It was, by any
measure, an astonishing coincidence. As the
biggest statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad
was pulled down ‘spontaneously‘ in front of the
world’s media, the Stars and Stripes which flew
on the Pentagon on 11 September was at hand to
be draped over its face.
“The U.S. army denied that the toppling of the
20-ft edifice by a tank tower was stage-managed.
It was a coincidence, they said, that Lt. Tim
McLaughlin, the keeper of that flag, happened to
be present. And, it has to be noted, the commander
of the U.S. marines who completed the
capture of Baghdad did express concern at the
time that the use of the Stars and Stripes
smacked of triumphalism. It was later changed to
an Iraqi flag. But not before acres of TV footage
had been shot.”