30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unofficial leaker in trouble<br />

EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION<br />

MEANWHILE, in England, another Pentagon<br />

Papers case may be brewing. You will recall that<br />

Observer article a week back that exposed U.S.<br />

spying on members of the Security Council. (U.S.<br />

buying of Security Council members is far more<br />

open.)<br />

At the time, few U.S. newspapers picked it up<br />

and White House spokesman Ari Fleischer<br />

declined to comment on it. It was DOA , as far as<br />

most U.S. news outlets were concerned. The<br />

Washington Times challenged its authenticity, as<br />

did Matt Drudge. Well now, Ed Vulliamy, one of<br />

the reporters who broke the story, tells us:<br />

“This is to inform you that there has just been<br />

an arrest at the British Government’s Communications<br />

Headquarters (GCHQ – equivalent of the<br />

NSA) in connection with the leak of the memo. If<br />

charges are made, they will be serious – Britain<br />

is far more severe in these matters than the U.S.<br />

(So far!).<br />

“They could result in a major trial and a long<br />

prison sentence for the alleged mole. It is also a<br />

criminal offence to receive such information in<br />

Britain (some of you may recall the ‘ABC’ trial of<br />

the 1970s), and this may also become an issue of<br />

press freedom. The authors of the piece will defy<br />

any attempt by the government to discuss our<br />

sources.<br />

“It is important that maximum international –<br />

as well as domestic British – pressure be<br />

brought to bear on the Blair government over<br />

this impending case, the prosecution of which<br />

will inevitably have a political agenda, and to<br />

protect this prospective defendant all we can.<br />

Pleading motive will be impossible because<br />

there is no defense of justification in Britain.”<br />

58<br />

That U.N. vote<br />

MEANWHILE, all the media is buzzing with<br />

reports that Washington wants the Security<br />

Council to vote tomorrow on the new resolution<br />

that would sanction war after St. Patrick’s Day.<br />

The Times speaks of “urgent diplomacy” and<br />

says it has so far failed. What is “urgent diplomacy”?<br />

It seems that translates into money<br />

changing hands, with promises of new U.S. Aid<br />

projects to come. The U.S. may succeed in turning<br />

the votes of many nations who want to be on<br />

the side of a winner.<br />

“It is a good time to be a Ghanaian,” said Joe<br />

Klein on ABC yesterday morning, apparently not<br />

knowing the difference between Ghana and<br />

Guinea unless I heard him wrong. CNN reported<br />

that French President Jacques Chirac and German<br />

Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder might fly<br />

over to cast their countries votes personally. Will<br />

Bush? Times agit-propster Maureen Dowd’s<br />

“Xanax Cowboy” might show up, too. CNN also<br />

said that we will we see which cards fall where, a<br />

direct steal of President Bush’s language which<br />

compared the Security Council’s deliberations to<br />

a card game. Interesting how a presidential<br />

metaphor quickly finds its way into ‘objective’<br />

news language.<br />

As for the President’s presence at the U.N., he<br />

may like the showdown aspects of it, and see it as<br />

a new chance to grandstand. We will see. The<br />

Daily Mirror in Britain tells us about another<br />

recent invite that the Commander-in-Chief<br />

turned down:<br />

“George Bush pulled out of a speech to the<br />

European Parliament when MEPs wouldn’t guarantee<br />

a standing ovation.<br />

“Senior White House officials said the Presi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!