UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
- TAGS
- updated
- coldtype
- coldtype.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Unofficial leaker in trouble<br />
EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION<br />
MEANWHILE, in England, another Pentagon<br />
Papers case may be brewing. You will recall that<br />
Observer article a week back that exposed U.S.<br />
spying on members of the Security Council. (U.S.<br />
buying of Security Council members is far more<br />
open.)<br />
At the time, few U.S. newspapers picked it up<br />
and White House spokesman Ari Fleischer<br />
declined to comment on it. It was DOA , as far as<br />
most U.S. news outlets were concerned. The<br />
Washington Times challenged its authenticity, as<br />
did Matt Drudge. Well now, Ed Vulliamy, one of<br />
the reporters who broke the story, tells us:<br />
“This is to inform you that there has just been<br />
an arrest at the British Government’s Communications<br />
Headquarters (GCHQ – equivalent of the<br />
NSA) in connection with the leak of the memo. If<br />
charges are made, they will be serious – Britain<br />
is far more severe in these matters than the U.S.<br />
(So far!).<br />
“They could result in a major trial and a long<br />
prison sentence for the alleged mole. It is also a<br />
criminal offence to receive such information in<br />
Britain (some of you may recall the ‘ABC’ trial of<br />
the 1970s), and this may also become an issue of<br />
press freedom. The authors of the piece will defy<br />
any attempt by the government to discuss our<br />
sources.<br />
“It is important that maximum international –<br />
as well as domestic British – pressure be<br />
brought to bear on the Blair government over<br />
this impending case, the prosecution of which<br />
will inevitably have a political agenda, and to<br />
protect this prospective defendant all we can.<br />
Pleading motive will be impossible because<br />
there is no defense of justification in Britain.”<br />
58<br />
That U.N. vote<br />
MEANWHILE, all the media is buzzing with<br />
reports that Washington wants the Security<br />
Council to vote tomorrow on the new resolution<br />
that would sanction war after St. Patrick’s Day.<br />
The Times speaks of “urgent diplomacy” and<br />
says it has so far failed. What is “urgent diplomacy”?<br />
It seems that translates into money<br />
changing hands, with promises of new U.S. Aid<br />
projects to come. The U.S. may succeed in turning<br />
the votes of many nations who want to be on<br />
the side of a winner.<br />
“It is a good time to be a Ghanaian,” said Joe<br />
Klein on ABC yesterday morning, apparently not<br />
knowing the difference between Ghana and<br />
Guinea unless I heard him wrong. CNN reported<br />
that French President Jacques Chirac and German<br />
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder might fly<br />
over to cast their countries votes personally. Will<br />
Bush? Times agit-propster Maureen Dowd’s<br />
“Xanax Cowboy” might show up, too. CNN also<br />
said that we will we see which cards fall where, a<br />
direct steal of President Bush’s language which<br />
compared the Security Council’s deliberations to<br />
a card game. Interesting how a presidential<br />
metaphor quickly finds its way into ‘objective’<br />
news language.<br />
As for the President’s presence at the U.N., he<br />
may like the showdown aspects of it, and see it as<br />
a new chance to grandstand. We will see. The<br />
Daily Mirror in Britain tells us about another<br />
recent invite that the Commander-in-Chief<br />
turned down:<br />
“George Bush pulled out of a speech to the<br />
European Parliament when MEPs wouldn’t guarantee<br />
a standing ovation.<br />
“Senior White House officials said the Presi-