UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
- TAGS
- updated
- coldtype
- coldtype.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
depicted people hit by weapons.<br />
Media Tenor, the international media monitoring<br />
organization, studied newscasts in six countries.<br />
It asked: “To which degree were journalists<br />
in the U.S. and abroad serving the interests of<br />
their governments, intentionally or not? Was the<br />
media merely part of a larger war strategy?”<br />
Media Tenor continues: “Many facts about this<br />
and other facets of the war will surface only over<br />
the course of the next decades, but our research<br />
does indicate that news media in different countries,<br />
if they did not lend outright support to<br />
their governments, cloaked in voices of patriotism<br />
and criticism, certainly did not oppose them.<br />
“Not surprisingly, we generally found overwhelming<br />
agreement with issues related to the<br />
war on U.S. news broadcasts.”<br />
So what is the bottom line? According to Burton,<br />
the former TV reporter: “The war with Iraq<br />
may indeed signal the decline of independent<br />
journalism in times of war and the loss of the<br />
adversarial role journalism once played with the<br />
U.S. government. With 24-hour coverage, Americans<br />
are seeing more wartime video than ever<br />
before, but less of the big picture than any other<br />
war. So far, the White House strategy to sell the<br />
war through the U.S. media has succeeded.”<br />
All of this gives me second thoughts about my<br />
own imaginary request. I guess I don’t want that<br />
embed slot in Washington after all.<br />
Watching this White House is hard enough.<br />
Living there could be soul-sucking. ●<br />
WINNERS AND LOSERS<br />
35<br />
IRONY AND REALITY IN<br />
REPORTING THE POST-WAR WAR<br />
NEW YORK, MAY 16, 2003 – We are watching a<br />
TV scene in Baghdad: A group of Iraqis is marching,<br />
marching in anger, with signs in English for<br />
a CNN camera that is recording their demands.<br />
They want a government, they want to get paid,<br />
they want the lights on, they want the garbage<br />
collected. Their rage is palpable.<br />
The camera cuts to an American military officer,<br />
smiling at them, motioning to them to calm<br />
down. He offers no response to their specific<br />
complaints.<br />
Cut to the sound bite that was used, for the<br />
benefit of the folks back home: “Isn’t it wonderful<br />
that these people finally have freedom of<br />
speech and can express themselves?”<br />
You can’t make this up, but news networks are<br />
not very good at dealing with irony. Their focus<br />
on routinized news reality cannot cope with the<br />
surrealism that now characterizes post-war<br />
reporting. As optimism pours out of Washington,<br />
pessimism stalks the streets of Baghdad. Arab<br />
News commented on the irony of the irony, even<br />
as most American outlets do not:<br />
“It is an irony that a nation so often accused of<br />
imperialism should prove so incompetent when<br />
it comes to playing the colonial administrator;<br />
the French and British are still so much better at<br />
these things, even decades after their empires<br />
have gone.”<br />
The liberation of Iraq was barely a week old<br />
before most of the U.S. news army staged its own<br />
withdrawal. There was a murder to cover in Cal-