30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

depicted people hit by weapons.<br />

Media Tenor, the international media monitoring<br />

organization, studied newscasts in six countries.<br />

It asked: “To which degree were journalists<br />

in the U.S. and abroad serving the interests of<br />

their governments, intentionally or not? Was the<br />

media merely part of a larger war strategy?”<br />

Media Tenor continues: “Many facts about this<br />

and other facets of the war will surface only over<br />

the course of the next decades, but our research<br />

does indicate that news media in different countries,<br />

if they did not lend outright support to<br />

their governments, cloaked in voices of patriotism<br />

and criticism, certainly did not oppose them.<br />

“Not surprisingly, we generally found overwhelming<br />

agreement with issues related to the<br />

war on U.S. news broadcasts.”<br />

So what is the bottom line? According to Burton,<br />

the former TV reporter: “The war with Iraq<br />

may indeed signal the decline of independent<br />

journalism in times of war and the loss of the<br />

adversarial role journalism once played with the<br />

U.S. government. With 24-hour coverage, Americans<br />

are seeing more wartime video than ever<br />

before, but less of the big picture than any other<br />

war. So far, the White House strategy to sell the<br />

war through the U.S. media has succeeded.”<br />

All of this gives me second thoughts about my<br />

own imaginary request. I guess I don’t want that<br />

embed slot in Washington after all.<br />

Watching this White House is hard enough.<br />

Living there could be soul-sucking. ●<br />

WINNERS AND LOSERS<br />

35<br />

IRONY AND REALITY IN<br />

REPORTING THE POST-WAR WAR<br />

NEW YORK, MAY 16, 2003 – We are watching a<br />

TV scene in Baghdad: A group of Iraqis is marching,<br />

marching in anger, with signs in English for<br />

a CNN camera that is recording their demands.<br />

They want a government, they want to get paid,<br />

they want the lights on, they want the garbage<br />

collected. Their rage is palpable.<br />

The camera cuts to an American military officer,<br />

smiling at them, motioning to them to calm<br />

down. He offers no response to their specific<br />

complaints.<br />

Cut to the sound bite that was used, for the<br />

benefit of the folks back home: “Isn’t it wonderful<br />

that these people finally have freedom of<br />

speech and can express themselves?”<br />

You can’t make this up, but news networks are<br />

not very good at dealing with irony. Their focus<br />

on routinized news reality cannot cope with the<br />

surrealism that now characterizes post-war<br />

reporting. As optimism pours out of Washington,<br />

pessimism stalks the streets of Baghdad. Arab<br />

News commented on the irony of the irony, even<br />

as most American outlets do not:<br />

“It is an irony that a nation so often accused of<br />

imperialism should prove so incompetent when<br />

it comes to playing the colonial administrator;<br />

the French and British are still so much better at<br />

these things, even decades after their empires<br />

have gone.”<br />

The liberation of Iraq was barely a week old<br />

before most of the U.S. news army staged its own<br />

withdrawal. There was a murder to cover in Cal-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!