30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION<br />

them to verify what they claim to find.<br />

One of the inspectors who was charged with<br />

finding such weapons is now speaking out.<br />

Aftenposten in Norway reports a story I have yet<br />

to see on American TV:<br />

“A U.S.-based Norwegian weapons inspector<br />

accuses the USA and Secretary of State Colin<br />

Powell with providing the United Nations Security<br />

Council with incorrect and misleading information<br />

about Iraq’s possession of weapons of<br />

mass destruction (WMD), newspaper Dagbladet<br />

reports.<br />

“Joern Siljeholm, Ph.D. in environmental<br />

chemistry, risk analysis and toxicology, said that<br />

the USA’s basis for going to war is thin indeed,<br />

and called it a slap in the face to the United<br />

Nations weapons inspectors.<br />

“Siljeholm told Dagbladet that Colin Powell’s<br />

report to the Security Council on how Iraq camouflaged<br />

their WMD program was full of holes.<br />

Much of what he said was wrong. It did not<br />

match up at all with our information. The entire<br />

speech was misleading, Siljeholm said.<br />

“We received much incomplete and poor intelligence<br />

information from the Americans, and our<br />

cooperation developed accordingly. Much of<br />

what has been claimed about WMDs has proven<br />

to be sheer nonsense. From what I have seen<br />

they are going to war on very little, Siljeholm<br />

told Dagbladet. I strongly doubt that the American<br />

will find anything at all. In any case I doubt<br />

that they will find WMDs that constitute a military<br />

threat, Siljeholm said.”<br />

Peace programming: the wrong demo<br />

REPORTING on alternatives to war is verboten.<br />

Case in point: Yesterday I was told about Jon<br />

92<br />

Alpert’s new project filming conversations<br />

between Iraqi high school students and their<br />

American counterparts in Iraq. He had total<br />

access, no minders and no censorship. I am told<br />

the final film is moving and timely. Reportedly he<br />

funded it himself. A top indy TV company tried<br />

to place it, sending it from network to network,<br />

channel to channel.<br />

There were, as of yesterday, NO, repeat NO,<br />

BUYERS. Jon has won more Emmy Awards than<br />

anyone I know, except perhaps Bill Moyers. He is<br />

a gutsy reporter who alone got into Baghdad in<br />

the aftermath of Gulf War I. At the time, he was<br />

working for NBC. His own network did not air his<br />

report and canned him for an unauthorized act<br />

of enterprise journalism.<br />

Now it is happening again. I am told from<br />

someone in the know that one three-initialed<br />

news network “passed” because the subjects of<br />

the film were “not in our demo.” They said they<br />

would prefer to save the money for their war<br />

coverage. (The Nets say today they expect to<br />

lose $200 million in revenue to bring us their versions<br />

of the war. Watch for stepped up post-war<br />

lobbying so they can win new concessions from<br />

the FCC that will allow them to recoup.)<br />

Peter Arnett is back<br />

THE networks have decided to share their footage<br />

from Baghdad. Peter Arnett, no stranger to wars –<br />

he seems to live for their oxygen – is staying put.<br />

And NBC has him this time. As we must recall, he<br />

was fired from CNN for reporting on a story<br />

revealing that the U.S. used biological warfare in<br />

Vietnam. The network canned several producers<br />

who sued, charging censorship and insisted the<br />

controversial Operation Tailwind report was true.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!