UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
- TAGS
- updated
- coldtype
- coldtype.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION<br />
them to verify what they claim to find.<br />
One of the inspectors who was charged with<br />
finding such weapons is now speaking out.<br />
Aftenposten in Norway reports a story I have yet<br />
to see on American TV:<br />
“A U.S.-based Norwegian weapons inspector<br />
accuses the USA and Secretary of State Colin<br />
Powell with providing the United Nations Security<br />
Council with incorrect and misleading information<br />
about Iraq’s possession of weapons of<br />
mass destruction (WMD), newspaper Dagbladet<br />
reports.<br />
“Joern Siljeholm, Ph.D. in environmental<br />
chemistry, risk analysis and toxicology, said that<br />
the USA’s basis for going to war is thin indeed,<br />
and called it a slap in the face to the United<br />
Nations weapons inspectors.<br />
“Siljeholm told Dagbladet that Colin Powell’s<br />
report to the Security Council on how Iraq camouflaged<br />
their WMD program was full of holes.<br />
Much of what he said was wrong. It did not<br />
match up at all with our information. The entire<br />
speech was misleading, Siljeholm said.<br />
“We received much incomplete and poor intelligence<br />
information from the Americans, and our<br />
cooperation developed accordingly. Much of<br />
what has been claimed about WMDs has proven<br />
to be sheer nonsense. From what I have seen<br />
they are going to war on very little, Siljeholm<br />
told Dagbladet. I strongly doubt that the American<br />
will find anything at all. In any case I doubt<br />
that they will find WMDs that constitute a military<br />
threat, Siljeholm said.”<br />
Peace programming: the wrong demo<br />
REPORTING on alternatives to war is verboten.<br />
Case in point: Yesterday I was told about Jon<br />
92<br />
Alpert’s new project filming conversations<br />
between Iraqi high school students and their<br />
American counterparts in Iraq. He had total<br />
access, no minders and no censorship. I am told<br />
the final film is moving and timely. Reportedly he<br />
funded it himself. A top indy TV company tried<br />
to place it, sending it from network to network,<br />
channel to channel.<br />
There were, as of yesterday, NO, repeat NO,<br />
BUYERS. Jon has won more Emmy Awards than<br />
anyone I know, except perhaps Bill Moyers. He is<br />
a gutsy reporter who alone got into Baghdad in<br />
the aftermath of Gulf War I. At the time, he was<br />
working for NBC. His own network did not air his<br />
report and canned him for an unauthorized act<br />
of enterprise journalism.<br />
Now it is happening again. I am told from<br />
someone in the know that one three-initialed<br />
news network “passed” because the subjects of<br />
the film were “not in our demo.” They said they<br />
would prefer to save the money for their war<br />
coverage. (The Nets say today they expect to<br />
lose $200 million in revenue to bring us their versions<br />
of the war. Watch for stepped up post-war<br />
lobbying so they can win new concessions from<br />
the FCC that will allow them to recoup.)<br />
Peter Arnett is back<br />
THE networks have decided to share their footage<br />
from Baghdad. Peter Arnett, no stranger to wars –<br />
he seems to live for their oxygen – is staying put.<br />
And NBC has him this time. As we must recall, he<br />
was fired from CNN for reporting on a story<br />
revealing that the U.S. used biological warfare in<br />
Vietnam. The network canned several producers<br />
who sued, charging censorship and insisted the<br />
controversial Operation Tailwind report was true.