30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

what really transpired in the briefing rooms and<br />

embed posts, even if the scale of civilian casualties<br />

is still unknown.<br />

Michael Massing reports in The New York<br />

Review of Books about those CENTCOM sessions<br />

that spun the story of the day complete<br />

with military video and lots of map pointing. He<br />

charges that many of the colleagues he was<br />

imprisoned with in that bunker in the Doha<br />

desert knew nothing about the region, the culture<br />

or the context. They were functioning as stenographers,<br />

not critical journalists, he said.<br />

Russell Smith says he was more peeved by<br />

CNN, “The voice of CENTCOM” as he called it,<br />

than Fox News, which one satirist describes as<br />

“the Official News Channel of the Homeland.<br />

(‘Ein Volk. Ein Reich. Ein Fuhrer. Ein News Channel.’)”<br />

“CNN was more irritating than the gleefully<br />

patriotic Fox News channel because CNN has a<br />

pretense of objectivity,” Smith writes. “It pretends<br />

to be run by journalists. And yet it dutifully<br />

uses all the language chosen by people in charge<br />

of ‘media relations’ at the Pentagon.”<br />

Clearly there is much we still don’t know about<br />

what happened on the ground in Iraq and the<br />

details of why the media covered it the way it<br />

did. Unfortunately, too, the growing chorus of<br />

criticism is still too little, too late.<br />

Mark the words of a media monitoring news<br />

dissector: Observations like these and even<br />

sharper criticisms to come will move soon from<br />

the margins to the mainstream on their way to<br />

becoming the conventional wisdom, “self-evident”<br />

truth, as per the very late Dr. Schopenhauer.<br />

In the end, with hindsight and reflection, all of<br />

journalism will look back in shame. ●<br />

WINNERS AND LOSERS<br />

39<br />

THE LINK BETWEEN WAR, THE<br />

FCC AND OUR RIGHT TO KNOW<br />

NEW YORK, MAY 01, 2003 – By now, all of us<br />

realize that there is a high-powered media campaign<br />

aimed at promoting the war on Iraq and<br />

shaping the views of the American people, relying<br />

on a media-savvy political strategy to sell the<br />

administration’s priorities and policies.<br />

There is an intimate link between the media,<br />

the war and the Bush Administration that even<br />

many activists are unaware of. Few administrations<br />

in history have been as adept at using<br />

polling, focus groups, “perception managers,”<br />

spinners, and I.O. or “information operations”<br />

specialists to sell slogans in order to further a<br />

“patriotically correct” climate. Orchestrating<br />

media coverage is one of their most well-honed<br />

skills, aided and abetted by professional PR<br />

firms, corporate consultants and media outlets.<br />

Our Republican Guard relies on Murdochowned<br />

media assets like the Fox News Channel,<br />

supportive newspapers, aggressive talk radio<br />

hosts, conservative columnists and an arsenal of<br />

on-air pundits adroitly polarizing opinion and<br />

devaluing independent journalism.<br />

They benefit from a media environment<br />

shaped by a wave of media consolidation that has<br />

led to a dramatic drop in the number of companies<br />

controlling our media from 50 to between<br />

five and seven – in just 10 years. Then there is the<br />

merger of news biz and show biz. Entertainmentoriented<br />

reality shows help depoliticize viewers<br />

while sensation-driven cable news limits analytical<br />

journalism and in-depth, issue-oriented cov-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!