UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
- TAGS
- updated
- coldtype
- coldtype.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
what really transpired in the briefing rooms and<br />
embed posts, even if the scale of civilian casualties<br />
is still unknown.<br />
Michael Massing reports in The New York<br />
Review of Books about those CENTCOM sessions<br />
that spun the story of the day complete<br />
with military video and lots of map pointing. He<br />
charges that many of the colleagues he was<br />
imprisoned with in that bunker in the Doha<br />
desert knew nothing about the region, the culture<br />
or the context. They were functioning as stenographers,<br />
not critical journalists, he said.<br />
Russell Smith says he was more peeved by<br />
CNN, “The voice of CENTCOM” as he called it,<br />
than Fox News, which one satirist describes as<br />
“the Official News Channel of the Homeland.<br />
(‘Ein Volk. Ein Reich. Ein Fuhrer. Ein News Channel.’)”<br />
“CNN was more irritating than the gleefully<br />
patriotic Fox News channel because CNN has a<br />
pretense of objectivity,” Smith writes. “It pretends<br />
to be run by journalists. And yet it dutifully<br />
uses all the language chosen by people in charge<br />
of ‘media relations’ at the Pentagon.”<br />
Clearly there is much we still don’t know about<br />
what happened on the ground in Iraq and the<br />
details of why the media covered it the way it<br />
did. Unfortunately, too, the growing chorus of<br />
criticism is still too little, too late.<br />
Mark the words of a media monitoring news<br />
dissector: Observations like these and even<br />
sharper criticisms to come will move soon from<br />
the margins to the mainstream on their way to<br />
becoming the conventional wisdom, “self-evident”<br />
truth, as per the very late Dr. Schopenhauer.<br />
In the end, with hindsight and reflection, all of<br />
journalism will look back in shame. ●<br />
WINNERS AND LOSERS<br />
39<br />
THE LINK BETWEEN WAR, THE<br />
FCC AND OUR RIGHT TO KNOW<br />
NEW YORK, MAY 01, 2003 – By now, all of us<br />
realize that there is a high-powered media campaign<br />
aimed at promoting the war on Iraq and<br />
shaping the views of the American people, relying<br />
on a media-savvy political strategy to sell the<br />
administration’s priorities and policies.<br />
There is an intimate link between the media,<br />
the war and the Bush Administration that even<br />
many activists are unaware of. Few administrations<br />
in history have been as adept at using<br />
polling, focus groups, “perception managers,”<br />
spinners, and I.O. or “information operations”<br />
specialists to sell slogans in order to further a<br />
“patriotically correct” climate. Orchestrating<br />
media coverage is one of their most well-honed<br />
skills, aided and abetted by professional PR<br />
firms, corporate consultants and media outlets.<br />
Our Republican Guard relies on Murdochowned<br />
media assets like the Fox News Channel,<br />
supportive newspapers, aggressive talk radio<br />
hosts, conservative columnists and an arsenal of<br />
on-air pundits adroitly polarizing opinion and<br />
devaluing independent journalism.<br />
They benefit from a media environment<br />
shaped by a wave of media consolidation that has<br />
led to a dramatic drop in the number of companies<br />
controlling our media from 50 to between<br />
five and seven – in just 10 years. Then there is the<br />
merger of news biz and show biz. Entertainmentoriented<br />
reality shows help depoliticize viewers<br />
while sensation-driven cable news limits analytical<br />
journalism and in-depth, issue-oriented cov-