30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“crew of the cantankerous” on the air, as you do<br />

almost nightly, think of the PR pluggers at<br />

Benador “working the phones” to spin media<br />

coverage. Makiya, incidentally, was at the American<br />

Enterprise Institute where President Bush<br />

made his most recent policy speech reinforcing<br />

his commitment to regime change over disarmament.<br />

Baiting Chomsky<br />

EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION<br />

ON Moyers’ NOW program, Makiya typically dismissed<br />

critics like Noam Chomsky and Edward<br />

Said (who, of course, were not interviewed anywhere<br />

on the air last night). Writing in The<br />

Guardian last May, Nik Cohen explained that:<br />

“He dates the schism between supporters of universal<br />

human rights and those on the Left and<br />

Right who regard any Western intervention as<br />

imperialism to the moment when the opponents<br />

of Saddam were denounced. Israel was built on<br />

the destruction of 400 Palestinian villages,<br />

Makiya says; Saddam destroyed at least 3,000<br />

Kurdish villages. Makiya, like every other Iraqi<br />

democrat you meet in London, has lost patience<br />

with those who will oppose the former but not<br />

the latter and is desperate for America to support<br />

a democratic revolution.”<br />

Richard Perle, another Benador bookee,<br />

looked tired and worn on CNBC last night. Earlier<br />

on Frontline, he was well made up with the<br />

kind of Hollywood lighting that many marvel<br />

over. That was on video. Live, his eyes have<br />

blackened, his hair has thinned and his pomposity<br />

seemed more strained. Watching all the<br />

Frontline shows last night certainly offered the<br />

context, history and background missing on the<br />

news shows and networks.<br />

82<br />

It was a march down memory lane to cast light<br />

on the origins of the crisis, but was I wrong to<br />

feel that it was drenched with middle of the road<br />

experts, mostly policy wonks, and in effect<br />

rationalized the administration’s course. It was<br />

strong in showing how Wolfowitz’s doctrine of<br />

pre-emptive bullying went from a minority view<br />

to become policy, but otherwise, I came way feeling<br />

that it was showing the logic for war as the<br />

consequence of U.N. failures and Iraqi belligerence.<br />

It took some shots at the right but treated<br />

its arguments with reverence. Moyers was certainly<br />

better and Charlie Rose, was, well, very<br />

Charlie Rose-ish. Maybe Kissinger was busy last<br />

night.<br />

Missing in the media<br />

FAIR reports: “Despite daily reports about the<br />

showdown with Iraq, Americans hear very little<br />

from mainstream media about the most basic<br />

fact of war: People will be killed and civilian<br />

infrastructure will be destroyed, with devastating<br />

consequences for public health long after the<br />

fighting stops. Since the beginning of the year,<br />

according to a search of the Nexis database<br />

(1/1/03-3/12/03), none of the three major television<br />

networks’ nightly national newscasts – ABC<br />

World News Tonight, CBS Evening News or NBC<br />

Nightly News – has examined in detail what longterm<br />

impact war will have on humanitarian conditions<br />

in Iraq. They’ve also downplayed the<br />

immediate civilian deaths that will be caused by<br />

a U.S. attack.”<br />

Pharmaceutical calmatives<br />

DEBORAH STERLING, a journalist writes: “What

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!