UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
UPDATED - ColdType
- TAGS
- updated
- coldtype
- coldtype.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION<br />
As is the custom at these annual dinners, the<br />
President was on hand, traditionally as the target<br />
for a comic assault. Not this year. There was<br />
no humor, no satire, no criticism, no real barbs<br />
allowed. The New York Times called it the most<br />
subdued such event ever. Just one big happy<br />
family, with Press Secretary Ari Fleisher on one<br />
side of the dais, and his nemesis, the dean of the<br />
White House reporters and war critic Helen<br />
Thomas, on the other. She was not invited to<br />
speak.<br />
This was the year for an aging Ray Charles to<br />
play old standards, and for President Bush to ask<br />
for God’s blessings for the souls of two American<br />
reporters who died covering his war. Once again,<br />
he was playing preacher, not president. He cited<br />
approvingly the late NBC reporter David<br />
Bloom’s last email speaking of his love of wife,<br />
children and Jesus. The President was giving not<br />
a speech as much as a benediction.<br />
The press is there year after year, it is said, as<br />
a sign of respect for the office of the President.<br />
Reporters like to see themselves as having an<br />
adversarial relationship with the officialdom<br />
they cover, but except for a few stalwarts like<br />
Helen Thomas and perhaps Dana Milbank of the<br />
Washington Post, they seem more like adulators<br />
than journalists.<br />
In this year of triumph, Bush spoke of the great<br />
successes of the war, and praised embedded<br />
reporters. He spoke of toppling the tyrant and<br />
used other applause lines that worked so well in<br />
his many speeches at military bases.<br />
To my surprise, this audience of professional<br />
skeptics gave him a big hand, as if victory in Iraq<br />
had been assured.<br />
Yes, the smoke is clearing, the looting is subsiding<br />
and the President is declaring an end to<br />
42<br />
the military phase of the invasion. But was there<br />
“Victory in Iraq”? And if, so for whom?<br />
As American newscasters gloated when each<br />
former regime member was snagged, described<br />
by his place in the Pentagon’s deck of cards –<br />
“We got the ace of spades, heh-heh” – it seemed<br />
as though the rout was complete.<br />
Saddam is out of commission. But, is he alive<br />
or dead? Tariq Aziz says he is still alive. But it<br />
doesn’t seem to matter as much as it once did.<br />
Our Republican Guard has defeated theirs.<br />
Iraq is in ruins. The infrastructure is busted up<br />
pretty good, along with the country’s stability,<br />
economy and former sense of enforced unity<br />
under Saddam. Now the country is fractured into<br />
political factions, many demanding that the U.S.<br />
get out.<br />
Is this Iraqi freedom?<br />
If the Afghanistan experience is any guide,<br />
reconstruction and order will be a long time<br />
coming. On April 26, the day that The New York<br />
Times reported the Pentagon was sending a<br />
“team of exiles to help run Iraq,” The Times’s<br />
Carlotta Gall reported from Kabul, “In a very<br />
real sense, the war here has not ended.” She is<br />
one of the few U.S. journalists still in the Afghan<br />
capital.<br />
According to media monitor Andrew Tyndall,<br />
the Afghanistan story, in network parlance, has<br />
all but “gone away.” He reports, “The war in<br />
Afghanistan received 306 minutes of coverage on<br />
the newscasts in November 2001, but that<br />
dropped to 28 minutes by February 2002, and last<br />
month it was one minute.”<br />
The Bush Administration had also deemed<br />
that Afghan war a victory, and much of the press<br />
concurred, even though Osama bin Laden and<br />
Mullah Omar were never found. Terrorists