UPDATED - ColdType

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION This will take a campaign and real organizing including protests, critiquing on a daily basis, letter writing, petitions, selective pressure on advertisers, law suits, and a counter media propaganda campaign to delegitimize phony news. It will require insider lobbying, educational forums, mobilizations of well-known journalists and activism within the profession. We need to create some positive goals and fight for our values and visions, not simply against theirs. I think we should develop a Media and Democracy Act, an omnibus bill that could be a way of showing how all of these issues are connected. This is not unlike the Contract for America in that it will create one easy to market and explain package of proposals that can forge a coalition with many stakeholders and constituencies. We are far stronger together than pushing separately. We have to simplify and project a united message. At the same time, we need to support alternative independent media and promote it to our organizations and e-lists. It is not enough to get an occasional progressive sound-bite on the air. We need to find a way to work together in a sustained effort, perhaps even create a united media 242 appeal to try to create a serious fund for this type of long term multi-track media work. It will take a big push. It can be done. We at Globalvision launched Mediachannel.org as global network for media change. We started with 20 groups. We now have well over a thousand. We also started the Globalvision News Network (GVnews.net) to offer syndicated coverage from 350 news partners to offer a different kind of news from around the world. We want antiwar activists to know about these offerings. We want to help syndicate and distribute media content. We have worked with and would like to do more with World Link TV, Free Speech TV, and Indy media projects to cross-promote and cross market. As a media person with a 30-year track record (CNN, ABC, WBCN etc), I know that media companies are responsive to pressure when it is sustained, sophisticated and well executed. If we don’t like the news, then we have to do something about it – with a well thought out strategy to press the press and move the media. Let’s discuss it – and do it. Your ideas are welcome . . . share them with me by writing: dissector@mediachannel.org. ●
weapons of mass destruction. The term “deception” that critics use to challenge the coverage is now being liberally applied to characterize the political leaders who started the war. Clare Short, a former member of the British Cabinet admitted to Parliament that there had been willful inconsistencies, mistruths, and embellishments in the pro-war speeches and dossiers offered by Prime Minister Tony Blair. She called it “honorable deception.” And so, at last, the “d-word,” the idea of deliberate deception enters mainstream discourse. This leads to another question, of course. If officials – including heads of state – whether ‘honorably’ or not, were deceptive, why didn’t the media catch them in the act, or even try to verify or debunk their claims. Why were all the halftruths and the self-serving spin that they came WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT? NEW YORK, JULY 1, 2003 AFTER THE WAR: THE SUMMER OF SUMMING UP Soldiers die, questions go unanswered he war is over but the Iraq debate goes on as summer erupts in the West and heat rises to insufferable degrees in the deserts of Arabia. By early July 2003, the Iraq story had become an unending catalogue of deadly incidents claiming the lives of British and U.S. soldiers. There were also daily reports of seething unrest and festering anger by a visibly unpurified and often enraged Iraqi population. It seems clear that if “we” won the war, we may have already lost the peace, if there ever was any. Alongside, the reality of the post-war war has been a non-stop parade of allegations, debates and political recriminations over the status of the still unsuccessful hunt for 243 wrapped in reported with little scrutiny? The truth is that most media organizations refused even to make the effort. After the war, Michael Getler, the Washington Post omsbudsman asked some questions that should have been shouted before the conflict got underway: “The question for news organizations is whether these claims should have been reportorially tested and challenged sufficiently. Were news organizations inhibited for fear of seeming unpatriotic after September llth?” THE PATRIOTISM POLICE THERE is no question that there was pressure on the media to stay in line. Eric Sorenson who ran the coverage at MSNBC told The New York Times, “Any misstep . . . and you can have the
Page 1 and 2:
EMBEDDED . WEAPONS OF MASS HOW THE
Page 3 and 4:
EMBEDDED
Page 5 and 6:
EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRACTI
Page 7:
DEDICATION To all who fought and th
Page 11 and 12:
PROLOGUE TO A POST LOG IT is safe t
Page 13:
or was persuaded by its storyline.
Page 17 and 18:
BLOGGING THE WAR AWAY ew of us esca
Page 19 and 20:
aging the perceptions” of those w
Page 21 and 22:
The embedded journalist THIS book f
Page 23 and 24:
as if it was the property of, and i
Page 25 and 26:
Middle Eastern studies and internat
Page 27 and 28:
world. Clearly some of it brought b
Page 29:
“Can there be a democracy when th
Page 33 and 34:
TRAINING MEDIA FOR WAR By KATHLEEN
Page 35 and 36:
unprecedented access to the war in
Page 37 and 38:
depicted people hit by weapons. Med
Page 39 and 40:
The data confirming that we were il
Page 41 and 42:
what really transpired in the brief
Page 43 and 44:
What is the connection between the
Page 45 and 46:
emain in Afghanistan, and they may
Page 47 and 48:
studs? Were readers and viewers wel
Page 49:
competitors, like CNN and MSNBC, to
Page 53 and 54:
NEW YORK / FEBRUARY 24, 2003 IRAQI
Page 55 and 56:
WAR CALLS AND THE NEWS BIZ RUSHES T
Page 57 and 58:
seem to want to be in the media mor
Page 59 and 60:
more can be made of.” Underscore
Page 61 and 62:
dent would only go to Strasbourg to
Page 63 and 64:
The media is the illusion I LOVE th
Page 65 and 66:
to the problems facing journalists
Page 67 and 68:
major organs, and clostridium perfr
Page 69 and 70:
nalism.” The problem is that abse
Page 71 and 72:
Redstone [chairman, CEO, Viacom] ha
Page 73 and 74:
And what about Arab news outlets wi
Page 75:
“[A] NEW and subtler instrument m
Page 79 and 80:
NEW YORK,MARCH 17,2003 WASHINGTON D
Page 81 and 82:
(who, overseas readers should be aw
Page 83 and 84:
PBS to the Rescue SURELY there were
Page 85 and 86:
can we do here? 1) Rumsfeld has alr
Page 87 and 88:
Phillip Rochot, a respected reporte
Page 89:
attlefield. So having journalists h
Page 93 and 94:
NEW YORK,MARCH 19,2003 RIGHT WING L
Page 95 and 96:
CNN later quietly settled with them
Page 97 and 98:
War dances or not, there clearly is
Page 99 and 100:
sources, military types, other CC n
Page 101 and 102:
which missed the signals for 9/11.
Page 103 and 104:
oadcast industry are now seeking, i
Page 105 and 106:
most of the rest of the world out o
Page 107 and 108:
the time? According to Samantha Pow
Page 109:
By GREG MITCHELL THE war is only a
Page 113 and 114:
NEW YORK, MARCH 25, 2003 IS THE INV
Page 115 and 116:
demoralized by the enemy’s fierce
Page 117 and 118:
eral Wesley Clark, former supreme a
Page 119 and 120:
www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm
Page 121 and 122:
500 embedded reporters, who natural
Page 123 and 124:
Put this warning on your TV set FIN
Page 125 and 126:
interest up close and personal stor
Page 127 and 128:
Reporting or distorting? HOW do we
Page 129 and 130:
lessly by a stable of resident ‘e
Page 131 and 132:
ians, torn to pieces before they co
Page 133 and 134:
emphasized that bombing a televisio
Page 135 and 136:
cated surveillance equipment and is
Page 137 and 138:
Myers yesterday blasted critics of
Page 139 and 140:
interviews that Secretary of Defens
Page 141 and 142:
information is probably more freely
Page 143:
BATTLEFIELD BLUES WAR AS ONE BIG JO
Page 147 and 148:
NEW YORK, MARCH 25, 2003 INVADERS F
Page 149 and 150:
clients. “Air the National Anthem
Page 151 and 152:
“The right-wing media and politic
Page 153 and 154:
eporter as they come. They used a r
Page 155 and 156:
Their Master’s Voice YEARS ago, R
Page 157 and 158:
alongside the reporters in Iraq,”
Page 159 and 160:
What are we seeing? Last night Aaro
Page 161 and 162:
cell door was closed and the click
Page 163:
SURROUNDING BAGHDAD WORDS OF THE WI
Page 167 and 168:
NEW YORK, APRIL 3, 2003 DEATH TOLL
Page 169 and 170:
APRIL 4: WHAT WOULD DR. KING SAY AB
Page 171 and 172:
ance, bad weather and vulnerable su
Page 173 and 174:
It’s an invasion, not a war. It
Page 175 and 176:
Arnett back on the air PETER ARNETT
Page 177 and 178:
eport is compromised.” “When a
Page 179 and 180:
Red Cross horrified IT was in the C
Page 181 and 182:
military conflict, it is getting ug
Page 183 and 184:
offer a useful framework to integra
Page 185 and 186:
eporters and photographers out of t
Page 187 and 188:
Peter Wilson, London correspondent
Page 189:
used on television). J - Jihad, Jih
Page 193 and 194: NEW YORK, APRIL 10, 2003: LOOTING E
Page 195 and 196: EMBEDDED: SO, WEAPONS THIS IS OF VI
Page 197 and 198: could see bullets flying and then w
Page 199 and 200: in an attempt to kill Saddam Hussei
Page 201 and 202: could this all be part of the plan?
Page 203 and 204: Off the charts IN FACT, there was a
Page 205 and 206: The CIA role: Out of sight, not out
Page 207 and 208: assess each market whenever a compa
Page 209 and 210: although we never met. It was his b
Page 211 and 212: chaos, violence, unrest. And it jus
Page 213 and 214: Off with their heads JOURNALISTS wh
Page 215 and 216: esearcher David Miller of Stirling
Page 217 and 218: worked for Iraq now says WMD eviden
Page 219 and 220: tiques. Without passing judgments,
Page 221 and 222: “At least 15 paintings, gold-plat
Page 223 and 224: or downloading video games that are
Page 225 and 226: its case. If it does not, the world
Page 227 and 228: Kurds. At that time, in the Bush ye
Page 229 and 230: grams such as the “Birthright Isr
Page 231: to gullible reporters. ABC further
Page 235 and 236: NEW YORK, MAY 30, 2003 AFTER THE WA
Page 237 and 238: As Linda McQuaig wrote in the Toron
Page 239: REMEMBERING THE FALLEN SOME FACTS F
Page 243: A CALL FOR MEDIA ACTIVISM Now’s t
Page 247 and 248: A MILITARY VIEW EVEN experienced mi
Page 249 and 250: statesman overnight. 9/11 provided
Page 251 and 252: “media.” That is a dangerous wo
Page 253 and 254: diers can eventually be withdrawn.
Page 255 and 256: State of the Union address, it was
Page 257 and 258: lenged the journalists present to t
Page 259 and 260: your TV programs, See It Now, Harve
Page 261 and 262: had when our voices could reach onl
Page 263 and 264: to reason why.” Sometimes, not to
Page 265: “March 10. Pro-Government rallies
Page 269 and 270: MEDIA TENOR (BONN) THE WAR AGAINST
Page 271 and 272: many’s public broadcaster ARD - w
Page 273 and 274: actions to that of international po
Page 275 and 276: But, surprisingly, protests did not
Page 277 and 278: in that direction, however, were si
Page 279: of the war,” citing Nielsen Media
Page 283 and 284: NEW YORK, OCTOBER 10, 2003 COVERING
Page 285 and 286: view of events there that put our B
Page 287 and 288: BBC and the leading lights of the A
Page 289 and 290: had taken off. This time, there wer
Page 291 and 292: of the Media was too soft on Presid
Page 293 and 294: they play to engineering consent, a
Page 295:
LAST WORDS
Page 299:
CREDITS
Page 302 and 303:
EMBEDDED: WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION
show all

UPDATED - ColdType

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?