30.01.2013 Views

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

UPDATED - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emain in Afghanistan, and they may be<br />

regrouping and getting stronger.<br />

As one who covered the victory parades after<br />

the first Gulf War, I remember the yellow ribbons<br />

flying and the crowds chanting, “We Are<br />

Number One!” That conflict, too, was proclaimed<br />

a victory until it was clear that it wasn’t. Yes,<br />

Kuwait was returned to some of the richest people<br />

in the world who own it. But Saddam survived,<br />

hanging on for the next 12 years.<br />

Soon the initial media-supported image of<br />

Desert Storm was revised. The sense of victory<br />

was short-lived. In the aftermath, the media complained<br />

about having been had, as atrocities<br />

were revealed and it turned out that the smart<br />

bombs used were not so smart. The President<br />

who won the war would soon lose his bid for<br />

reelection.<br />

Fast forward to Iraq, 2003.<br />

Who won? And who lost?<br />

A high-tech U.S. military equipped with the<br />

best weaponry in the world overwhelmed a second-rate,<br />

no-tech defense force. It was no contest.<br />

If it was a prize fight, the ref would have<br />

called it in the first round. It was just as those<br />

who planned it knew it would be – a bloody and<br />

one-sided massacre. The coalition of the willing<br />

quickly became a coalition of the killing. All the<br />

fears of the anticipated use of bio-chemical<br />

weapons that aroused the public and made the<br />

war SEEM so risky never came to pass.<br />

“I never thought Saddam would use those<br />

weapons,” ABC’s Ted Koppel confided after the<br />

war was over. He revealed that the general he<br />

was embedded said he didn’t believe the<br />

weapons would be used either.<br />

The war’s biggest and most spectacular operations,<br />

the shock and awe and the decapitation<br />

WINNERS AND LOSERS<br />

43<br />

strikes, all were pricey failures. The “collateral<br />

damage” that we were told would be minimal<br />

was enormous.<br />

Warnings about the dangers of looting cultural<br />

treasures were ignored. U.S. soldiers stood<br />

by and watched, sometimes plunging in to pick<br />

up a souvenir or two. A employee of Fox News<br />

was busted and later fired for stealing two paintings,<br />

one of which he said he wanted to give to<br />

the head of his super-patriotic channel. They<br />

fired him for his gesture.<br />

“We” won, but what have we won?<br />

There is oil of course – nothing to snipe at, at<br />

least not in the way that those who suggested<br />

that oil was the rationale for war were sniped at.<br />

The successful battle plan so great at quickly<br />

liberating territory was half-assed when it came<br />

to liberating people. The precision bombing<br />

somehow knocked out the lights and the water<br />

supply. No one knows how many Iraqis died. “We<br />

don’t do body counts” was the military commanders’<br />

standard response to questions about<br />

estimates of how many died. There were sure<br />

enough casualties to overwhelm Iraq’s understocked<br />

hospitals.<br />

For U.S. viewers, this reality of war-as-hell was<br />

mostly out of sight and out of mind.<br />

It was sanitized from view, admitted Ashleigh<br />

Banfield, the MSNBC correspondent who had<br />

been groomed as her network’s answer to CNN’s<br />

Christiane Amanpour. Banfield told a college<br />

crowd at Kansas State – but not her TV audience:<br />

“We didn’t see what happened when Marines<br />

fired M-16s. We didn’t see what happened after<br />

mortars landed, only the puff of smoke. There<br />

were horrors that were completely left out of<br />

this war. So was this journalism? Or was this coverage?”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!