12.02.2013 Views

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116 <strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Foams</strong>: A <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

10.2 The strength of sandwich beams<br />

In the design of sandwich beams, the strength is important as well as the stiffness.<br />

Consider again the sandwich beams under four-point bending and under<br />

three-point bending, as sketched in Figure 10.2. Simple analytical formulae<br />

can be derived by idealizing the foam core and solid face-sheets by rigid,<br />

ideally plastic solids of uniaxial strength f y and c y , respectively.<br />

Face yield<br />

When the skins of a sandwich panel or beam are made from a material of<br />

low yield strength, face yield determines the limit load Ffy. The simplest<br />

approach is to assume that plastic collapse occurs when the face sheets attain<br />

while the core yields simultaneously at a stress level of<br />

the yield strength f y<br />

c<br />

y<br />

. For both three- and four-point bending, the collapse load is determined<br />

by equating the maximum bending moment within the sandwich panel to the<br />

plastic collapse moment of the section, giving<br />

Ffy D<br />

4bt⊲c C t⊳<br />

ℓ<br />

f<br />

y<br />

C bc2<br />

ℓ<br />

for three-point bending, and<br />

Ffy D<br />

4bt⊲c C t⊳<br />

ℓ s<br />

f<br />

y<br />

c<br />

y<br />

C bc2<br />

ℓ s<br />

c<br />

y<br />

⊲10.9⊳<br />

⊲10.10⊳<br />

for four-point bending.<br />

These relations can be simplified by neglecting the contribution of the core<br />

to the plastic collapse moment, given by the second term on the right-hand<br />

sides of equations (10.9) and (10.10). On labeling this simplified estimate of<br />

the collapse load by Ffy we find that<br />

Ffy<br />

Ffy<br />

D 1 C t c<br />

C<br />

c 4t<br />

c<br />

y<br />

f<br />

y<br />

⊲10.11⊳<br />

for both three- and four-point bending. The error incurred by taking Ffy<br />

instead of Ffy is small for typical sandwich panels with a metallic foam core.<br />

For example, upon taking the representative values t/c D 0.1 and c y / f y D<br />

0.02, we obtain an error of 15% according to equation (10.11). It is safer to<br />

design on Ffy than on Ffy because a low-ductility core will fracture almost<br />

as soon as it yields, causing catastrophic failure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!