Metal Foams: A Design Guide
Metal Foams: A Design Guide
Metal Foams: A Design Guide
- TAGS
- upload.vnuki.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
148 <strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Foams</strong>: A <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />
10.9 Recommendations for sandwich design<br />
For those wishing to explore cellular metal core sandwich construction, the<br />
following recommendations are pertinent:<br />
1. Determine the constraints that govern the structure and, in particular,<br />
whether it is stiffness or strength-limited.<br />
2. If stiffness-limited, the procedure for determining the minimum weights is<br />
straightforward, using the formulae summarized in the tables. It is important<br />
to realize that there will always be lighter configurations (especially optimized<br />
honeycomb or waffle panels). Those configurations should be explicitly<br />
identified, whereupon a manufacturing cost and durability comparison<br />
can be made that determines the viability of sandwich construction. Other<br />
qualities of the cellular metal may bias the choice. It is important to calculate<br />
the domains wherein the weights based on elasticity considerations<br />
cannot be realized, because of the incidence of ‘inelastic’ modes: face<br />
yielding, core yielding, face wrinkling. Some help in assessing these limits<br />
has been provided.<br />
3. When strength-limited (particularly when buckling-limited), the rules<br />
governing sandwich construction are less well formulated. In general,<br />
numerical methods are needed to compare and contrast this type of<br />
construction with stiffened systems. Some general guidelines are given in<br />
this <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>; these give insight into the loadings and configurations<br />
most likely to benefit from sandwich construction. Configurations unlikely<br />
to benefit are also described. It is recommended that where benefits seem<br />
likely, detailed simulations and testing should be used to assess the viability<br />
of sandwich construction.<br />
References<br />
Allen H.G. (1969) Analysis and <strong>Design</strong> of Structural Sandwich Panels, Pergamon Press, Oxford.<br />
Andrews, E.H., Gioux, G., Onck, P. and Gibson, L.J. (1999) The role of specimen size, specimen<br />
shape and surface preparation in mechanical testing of aluminum foams. To appear in Mat.<br />
Sci. and Engineering A.<br />
Bart-Smith, H. (2000) PhD thesis, Harvard University.<br />
Budiansky, B. (1999) On the minimum weights of compression structures. Int. J. Solids and<br />
Structures 36, 3677–3708.<br />
Deshpande, V.S. and Fleck, N.A. (1999) Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. To<br />
appear in J. Mech. Phys. Solids.<br />
Gerard, G. (1956) Minimum Weight Analysis of Compression Structures, New York University<br />
Press, New York.<br />
Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1997) Cellular Solids, Structure and Properties, 2nd edition,<br />
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Ch. 9, pp. 345 et seq.<br />
Harte, A.-M. (1999) Private communication.<br />
Hutchinson, J.W. and He, M.Y. (1999) Buckling of cylindrical sandwich shells with metal foam<br />
cores. Int. J. Solids and Structures (in press).