12.02.2013 Views

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 <strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Foams</strong>: A <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

10.9 Recommendations for sandwich design<br />

For those wishing to explore cellular metal core sandwich construction, the<br />

following recommendations are pertinent:<br />

1. Determine the constraints that govern the structure and, in particular,<br />

whether it is stiffness or strength-limited.<br />

2. If stiffness-limited, the procedure for determining the minimum weights is<br />

straightforward, using the formulae summarized in the tables. It is important<br />

to realize that there will always be lighter configurations (especially optimized<br />

honeycomb or waffle panels). Those configurations should be explicitly<br />

identified, whereupon a manufacturing cost and durability comparison<br />

can be made that determines the viability of sandwich construction. Other<br />

qualities of the cellular metal may bias the choice. It is important to calculate<br />

the domains wherein the weights based on elasticity considerations<br />

cannot be realized, because of the incidence of ‘inelastic’ modes: face<br />

yielding, core yielding, face wrinkling. Some help in assessing these limits<br />

has been provided.<br />

3. When strength-limited (particularly when buckling-limited), the rules<br />

governing sandwich construction are less well formulated. In general,<br />

numerical methods are needed to compare and contrast this type of<br />

construction with stiffened systems. Some general guidelines are given in<br />

this <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>; these give insight into the loadings and configurations<br />

most likely to benefit from sandwich construction. Configurations unlikely<br />

to benefit are also described. It is recommended that where benefits seem<br />

likely, detailed simulations and testing should be used to assess the viability<br />

of sandwich construction.<br />

References<br />

Allen H.G. (1969) Analysis and <strong>Design</strong> of Structural Sandwich Panels, Pergamon Press, Oxford.<br />

Andrews, E.H., Gioux, G., Onck, P. and Gibson, L.J. (1999) The role of specimen size, specimen<br />

shape and surface preparation in mechanical testing of aluminum foams. To appear in Mat.<br />

Sci. and Engineering A.<br />

Bart-Smith, H. (2000) PhD thesis, Harvard University.<br />

Budiansky, B. (1999) On the minimum weights of compression structures. Int. J. Solids and<br />

Structures 36, 3677–3708.<br />

Deshpande, V.S. and Fleck, N.A. (1999) Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. To<br />

appear in J. Mech. Phys. Solids.<br />

Gerard, G. (1956) Minimum Weight Analysis of Compression Structures, New York University<br />

Press, New York.<br />

Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1997) Cellular Solids, Structure and Properties, 2nd edition,<br />

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Ch. 9, pp. 345 et seq.<br />

Harte, A.-M. (1999) Private communication.<br />

Hutchinson, J.W. and He, M.Y. (1999) Buckling of cylindrical sandwich shells with metal foam<br />

cores. Int. J. Solids and Structures (in press).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!