12.02.2013 Views

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 <strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Foams</strong>: A <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

ψ =<br />

W<br />

b 2 ρ s<br />

Optimum<br />

density, (ρ c /ρ s )<br />

0.01<br />

0.008<br />

0.006<br />

0.004<br />

0.002<br />

0<br />

0.04<br />

0.03<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

0<br />

0<br />

a<br />

E c/E s = (ρ c/ρ s) 2<br />

b<br />

Wrinkling,<br />

buckling<br />

E c/E s = (ρ c/ρ s) 2<br />

E c/E s = 3(ρ c /ρ s) 2<br />

E c /E s = 3(ρ c /ρ s ) 2<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Π =<br />

P<br />

λE fb<br />

Wrinkling, yielding,<br />

buckling<br />

(10 5 )<br />

Yielding,<br />

buckling<br />

Figure 10.19 Global weight minima for sandwich and hat-stiffened panels<br />

Other configurations<br />

Corresponding diagrams for panels and columns (Budiansky, 1999) are<br />

presented on Figures 10.18–10.20; associated buckling modes are indicated<br />

on the insets. Results for minimum weight flat sandwich panels at a fixed core<br />

density, c/ s D 0.1 (Figure 10.18) are not especially promising. There is only<br />

a small domain of weight advantage, arising when sandwich construction is used

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!