12.02.2013 Views

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

Metal Foams: A Design Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c/<br />

Face<br />

sheet<br />

yielding<br />

0.14<br />

0.12<br />

0.1<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

A<br />

D<br />

Maximum deflection<br />

X<br />

Optimum<br />

Sandwich structures 131<br />

ρc /ρs = 0.1<br />

Π = 10−4 0.02<br />

0<br />

B<br />

C<br />

0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025<br />

log [(1/Π D )(c/ )]<br />

1<br />

a<br />

Core yielding<br />

Face yield<br />

D<br />

Core shear<br />

δ − /<br />

2<br />

t /<br />

Log (t/ )<br />

3<br />

Stiffness<br />

b<br />

C E<br />

ρ c /ρ s<br />

Figure 10.11 (a) A design map based on panel dimensions for Al alloy<br />

sandwich panels at specified load index (5 D 10 4 ) and core density<br />

( c/ s D 0.1), subject to an allowable displacement (υ/ℓ D 0.02). (b) A<br />

schematic design map using modified coordinates suggested by<br />

equation (10.7), showing trends with core properties and allowable stiffness.<br />

Line (3) refers to core shear, line (1) to the stiffness constraint and line (2) to<br />

face yielding<br />

The example has been used to illustrate the process used to minimize the<br />

weight subject to constraints on failure and deflection. In the present instance,<br />

the process can be carried out analytically. Often, however, a straightforward<br />

numerical approach is the simplest and most effective way to determine the<br />

optimal design. The preceding example may be used to illustrate the numerical<br />

methodology:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!