13.02.2013 Views

sejal architectural glass limited - Securities and Exchange Board of ...

sejal architectural glass limited - Securities and Exchange Board of ...

sejal architectural glass limited - Securities and Exchange Board of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A complaint bearing Complaint No. 635 <strong>of</strong> 1998 was filed in the District Consumer Disputes Redressal<br />

Forum, Mumbai on December 12, 1998 by the Complainants against the opposite party, in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs. 54,000/- as payable on maturity <strong>of</strong> the bonds @ 18% p.a. as interest, a sum<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000 towards interest paid on borrowings <strong>and</strong> mental tension suffered by arranging the funds<br />

<strong>and</strong> an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10,000/- towards the cost <strong>and</strong> expenses incurred in the correspondence <strong>and</strong><br />

towards cost <strong>of</strong> the complaint. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, by its order dated<br />

September 28, 2000 ordered the Opposite Party to pay to the Complainants a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs. 54000/- with<br />

interest @ 12% per annum <strong>and</strong> Rs. 1000/- as costs towards the Complaint. The Complainants have not<br />

got any response or payment <strong>of</strong> the decretal amount <strong>and</strong> have therefore filed an Appeal before the<br />

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra.<br />

The said Appeal is pending before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra.<br />

Cases filed against our Directors<br />

There are no cases filed against our directors.<br />

V. Past Penalties Levied in the Last Five Years<br />

The following penalties have been imposed on our Company by the Assistant Sales Tax Officer,<br />

Dadra <strong>and</strong> Nagar Haveli, under Rule 10(2) <strong>of</strong> the Central Sales Tax (Dadra <strong>and</strong> Nagar Haveli)<br />

Rules, 1983<br />

Assessment Penalty imposed Brief particulars regarding<br />

Year<br />

(In Rs.)<br />

penalty<br />

1999 – 2000 500/- Penalty imposed for not<br />

filling the quarterly returns<br />

in time.<br />

2000-2001 500/- Penalty imposed for not<br />

filling the quarterly returns<br />

in time.<br />

2002-2003 1,54,649/- Penalty imposed for short<br />

payment.<br />

2004-2005 1,62,033/- Penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1,61,033/charged<br />

as penal interest<br />

for duty not paid <strong>and</strong> Rs.<br />

1000/- imposed for not<br />

filing the returns timely<br />

<strong>and</strong> correctly.<br />

VII. Amount owed to Small Scale Undertaking <strong>and</strong> Other Creditors:<br />

209<br />

Remarks<br />

(Paid / Payable)<br />

Paid<br />

There are no small scale undertakings to whom our Company owes a sum exceeding Rs. 1 Lac which is<br />

outst<strong>and</strong>ing more than 30 days, as on September 30, 2007. However, our Company owes an agreegate<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.7,24,69,132 to various other creditors’ exceeding Rs. 1 Lac individually, which is<br />

outst<strong>and</strong>ing more than 30 days, as on September 30, 2007.<br />

Litigation with respect to our Promoters / Promoters Group <strong>and</strong> other Ventures <strong>of</strong> our Promoters<br />

Sejal Glass House<br />

Paid<br />

Paid<br />

Paid

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!